It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The UN's highest court is set to make a landmark ruling in the first case of a state charged with genocide.
If the Bosnian suit is successful, it will be the first time a state, rather than an individual or group, has been held responsible for genocide.
Bosnia could then seek billions of dollars in compensation from Serbia.
Originally posted by Hellmutt
Latest update from source link:
"Court clears Serbia of genocide"
The UN's highest court at The Hague has cleared Serbia of direct responsibility for genocide during the Bosnian war of the 1990s.
But the International Court of Justice also said Serbia violated international law by failing to prevent the 1995 massacre at Srebrenica.
Originally posted by Souljah
Srebrenica massacre
Originally posted by Hellmutt
massacre, that's the keyword. Massacre - Genocide. There's a difference. Two different words, two different meanings. There were many massacres commited by both sides during that war. Srebrenica was a massacre, not genocide. It was a very tragic event. War is Hell.
Originally posted by Souljah
If the Serbs have violated international law by failing to prevent Srebrenica massacre - what exactly have the Dutch violated, for also FAILING to prevent the Srebranica massacre, but they also gave their "peacekeepers" MEDALS? I mean that is not exactly something you should be proud of and keep a medal for...
Originally posted by khunmoon
The Dutch UN peacekeeping force had ony light armored vehicles and handweapons, and thety were only to use in selfdefense.
Srebenica Widows Sue UN, Dutch Government
And then Sabaheta saw something she still can barely believe: A group of Serbian soldiers ran across some Dutch troops - and the soldiers greeted one another happily. They threw their caps in the air and some even hugged one another.
First of all, in contradiction to their UN orders, the Dutch troops did not protect the Muslims, so that the population became an unprotected target for the Serbs. Secondly, the Dutch authorities were slow to report the atrocities to the UN - which is why no additional help was sent.
Dutch troops lined up with the Serbian Chetniks as if nothing had happened. The UN soldiers had helped to separate the Muslim men from their families. Zumra Sehomerovic saw her husband once more, standing in a ditch on the left side of the road. He was never seen again.
"A few soldiers collaborated with the Serbs out of fear." But the Dutch government and the United Nations should never have exposed such "completely unprepared people" to a situation where serious shooting was taking place.
Originally posted by khunmoon
I like to read it all, because, where I've heard about the passitivity of the Dutch and reports on some degree of coorperation, I've not heard of this kinda fraternization ...but your link is blank page.
Think it could be fixed?