It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You have voted nick7261 for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have one more vote left for this month.
Originally posted by Damocles
well nick, its no secret i disagree with your, and most "truth movement" peoples opinions in many of the areas surrounding 9-11. but its also no secret that i dont think we're getting the whole story for one reason or another.
what you have provided is something that, while may or may not be valid, IS layed out in an orderly well presented fashion.
it shows you put more effort into it than a few minutes of random babbling to spout off a baseless accusation about an uninformed opinion.
you stated an opinion and then provided evidence to back it up. evidence doesnt equal proof, but it does provide things to consider.
of all of the theories surrounding 9-11 this in my opinion is an example of a good one.
for this type of great work, ill kick you a WATS, even if im not sure i agree with you.
Originally posted by savage99
Good question... IS there anyone that knows what was on the documents that were stolen and destroyed? Since it was considered classified...I doubt we will know.
I'm no expert on legal matters, but shouldn't stealing and the destroying stuff like this be treated more like treason?
Originally posted by 137
Nice research!
Is there anything officially known about the motives of this crime?
And you don't see anything at the very least unethical about this?
Originally posted by pesky george
[
And you don't see anything at the very least unethical about this?
I didn’t say that. I was just wondering what conspiracy you were referring to.
The preponderance of evidence shows that there is some question regarding the timing of Hamilton's hiring. The fact that Hamilton is now a paid employee of Berger's, shows the appearance of impropriety.
This is enough to indict any other citizen.
I am tiring of those who dismiss government conspiracies as ridiculous, while the USA imprisons more people for conspiracy than any other country in the world.
Why would one think that those who work in the government are any different than citizens?
Originally posted by thx1137
Hi, I'm a new member here. Thanks for your research.
I thought the key statement in the OP was Berger's comments:"I'm glad that the 9/11 commission has made clear that it received all the documents that it sought, all the documents that it needed, and I'm pleased to finally have this matter resolved"
The 9/11 commission was only seeking documents to support the Arab superpilots plot, if I'm not mistaken.
PS I'd be real interested in the Curt Weldon info as well.
Originally posted by pesky george
Ther is little difference between Democrats and REpublicans when it comes to 9/11. There is enough evidence to convince me that there is more than politics envolved with the attack. Both parties are covering up what really happened. Everything boils down to money and corporations.
Reality - 2007 is the year the trade centers would be required to replace the aluminum outer shell. The cost of the scaffolding alone was in the billions.
5 of the hijackers were trained at United States military bases.
Airline stocks were sold short on the exact day of the 'attacks'.
These facts alone should be enough to start an investigaton the size never before seen by this country, but denial is all we get, that and being accused of being a tin hat wearing fool.
Being somewhat familiar with criminal law, those facts alone is enough to investigate.
Not to mention all the other "coincidences".
I have no idea what really happened, but I do know that the whole Berger-Stonebridge-Hamilton issue raises serious concerns about conflicts of interest and quid pro quo deals.
Originally posted by TheStev
The burden of proof lies with the people making claims. The official story is a claim, and therefore the burden of proof lies with the proponents of this story (such as yourself).
Yes, people making claims about pods, missiles, remote control planes and the like are required to provide proof of these claims. People simply questioning the official story and pointing out the holes in said story are not required to provide proof (other than proof of the holes, which has been provided time and time again) - in fact, they should be provided with proof by their opponents, by those claiming the official story to be true.
And no, explosion-proof, building-collapse-proof passports do not constitute proof.
Originally posted by TheStev
I have no idea what really happened, but I do know that the whole Berger-Stonebridge-Hamilton issue raises serious concerns about conflicts of interest and quid pro quo deals.
And Reality, this is exactly the point you need to look at. Other CTers are different, no doubt, but Nick and I both share this position and it's a position worth noting. We do not claim to know what happened. All we claim is that there are holes in the official story, and those holes have been pointed out (and as for the writing of this, have not been filled) time and time again.
Originally posted by GwionX
Al Gore must ba a DAMN good actor then...Seems like He, and about half of America was really pissed when Bush won. I guess that was all a part of this government plot.
Interesting research Nick. My focus now is on the Neo-Nazi opportunists that want to use the "9/11 Truth Movement propaganda campaign" to mobilize people against the USA.
I am satisfied that the Government did not actively participate in the events of 9/11...contrary to what the "truth movement" is preaching to the young and/or feeble minded.
I will concede that the 9/11 Commission's investigation and report are not as competent and comprehensive as a work of this magnitude should be.
Cheers! and palms down.
[edit on 25-2-2007 by GwionX]
Originally posted by Reality Hurts
All you're doing is linking articles, which may or may not be related. Its like playing "Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon". Im sure that if I wanted to, I could implicate Santa Claus by doing the same thing.
I again plead, go get some real evidence. Oh wait, its all locked away...
Are you sure? ALL of the evidence is locked away in some Raiders of the Lost Ark type secret warehouse? Not one shred exists? Are you sure of that?
***What about participants? Hmm? Surely people remotely controlled those planes. Talked to their spouses about it, their buddies in the service…
***Speaking of planes, they don’t just materialize from space. They’re built. And building them costs money. Someplace there must be order forms from Boeing.
***Someone fired that cruise missile…..from a launching platform of some kind. Real flesh and blood people. People that aren’t in some box in a warehouse.
***Somewhere there are requisition forms for Tomahawks, and item and inventory logs. Losing a tomahawk leaves a paper trail, and its all public record.
***I don’t know how to rig a building the size of the WTC for demolition, do you? The list of people who can collapse not one building that size, but 2, into their own footprint cannot be that long. There may be 20 people in the world who can successfully do it. Who are they? Where were they? Did they travel? Will they provide credit card bill summaries to prove that they were elsewhere on the week leading up to 911?
***Who were the pilots who shot down flight 93? Where are they? Do they drink in excess?
***If they didn’t shoot it down, where are the passengers? Locked away? They need care, that takes people to do it. And food and water, which leave a paper trail. Were they killed? By whom? Who are the killers and can they lead you to the bodies?
I could go on and on and on. But I won’t continue to do your job for you. Go. Find evidence. Find proof. It is out there, you’re just not looking.
My opinion? (A general opinion and not necessarily indicative of anyone in particular) Its soooooo easy to say “OMG Bush killed those people for oil!!!” over the internet, and not actually DO anything, or provide anything. Conspiracy theorists are getting lazy, all they want to do is type, not actually prove anything. Its all about the E-ego, not the actual fact.