It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Area 51 Leaked File

page: 1
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 24 2007 @ 10:30 PM
link   
Leaked Area 51 file.

Area 51 May not be hackable, but their garbage system is. Extracted from Hard Drive. Titled as UFO Case # 539652



UFO Case # 539652



















posted on Feb, 24 2007 @ 10:44 PM
link   
Um, ok??

What else can you tell us about this, that we can verify this is not a hoax?

If you supposedly had access to the case file, where and when was this taken?

Any info would be helpful in determining the validity of the photos.



posted on Feb, 24 2007 @ 11:44 PM
link   
it says here "SI-NY-1/1-5/07" Don't understand it, but mabey you do?



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 12:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by Gov_Leaker
it says here "SI-NY-1/1-5/07" Don't understand it, but mabey you do?


I have no clue.

Maybe the next member that stumbles onto this thread will have an idea about it.




posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 12:42 AM
link   

Original Anonymous Post By: anon_98215
This anonymous post is in response to ATS thread: Area 51 Leaked File

quote: Originally posted by Gov_Leaker
it says here "SI-NY-1/1-5/07" Don't understand it, but mabey you do?"

My interpretation of "SI-NY-1/1-5/07" is Staten Island, NY on dates Jan 1 through Jan 5, 2007.



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 02:42 AM
link   
I'd take this seriously if you could type a complete sentence.


Ox

posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 02:46 AM
link   
SI-NY? Staten Island New York perhaps?

As for the numbers? I have no idea.. obviously the 07 is the year..

Just a thought



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 06:12 AM
link   
Gov_leaker, I have some questions regarding your post:

1) How did you get hold of a government hard drive?
2) How do you know these photos have anything to do with area 51?
3) How are we meant to take this seriously when the photos could be of anything!?



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 08:46 AM
link   
I'm with GFad on this.
Why would they have very bad pics like this at Groom, when they could
get much cooler pics of black aircraft in their own hangars ?
( with proper clearance, of course )

My 2 cent,
Lex



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 09:17 AM
link   
Hey, I buy this. Any stray dog can walk out of Area 51 with a hard drive. They don't have them bar coded, there's no accountability. Used government computers show up at the Deseret Industries thrift shop in Vegas all the time. The Easter bunny told me this while I was crackin' down with Bigfoot and Elvis...



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 09:39 AM
link   
The pics are interesting, although without more information about them, are somewhat meaningless. Hopefully you can add something more here, Gov_Leaker.



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 09:50 AM
link   
Of all the pics that get leaked from area 51, we get little blurry yellow dots against the night sky.
Better luck next time : )



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 09:58 AM
link   
The only thing that's leaked out here is your cerebrum.

Nice try pal. And by nice I mean lame.

[edit on 25-2-2007 by John Nada]



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 10:50 AM
link   
teehee



EXIF data from one of the images:

Filename : 9.jpg
JFIF_APP1 : Exif
Main Information
Make : Canon
Model : Canon PowerShot SD550
Orientation : left-hand side
XResolution : 180/1
YResolution : 180/1
ResolutionUnit : Inch
DateTime : 2007:01:11 21:51:19
YCbCrPositioning : centered
Unknown (1001)3,1 : 1600
Unknown (1002)3,1 : 1200
ExifInfoOffset : 278
CustomRendered : Normal process
ExposureMode : Auto
WhiteBalance : Auto
DigitalZoomRatio : 3072/3072
SceneCaptureType : Night scene
Sub Information
ExposureTime : 1/8Sec
FNumber : F4.9
ExifVersion : 0220
DateTimeOriginal : 2007:01:11 21:51:19
DateTimeDigitized : 2007:01:11 21:51:19
ComponentConfiguration : YCbCr
CompressedBitsPerPixel : 3/1 (bit/pixel)
ShutterSpeedValue : 1/8Sec
ApertureValue : F4.9
ExposureBiasValue : EV0.0
MaxApertureValue : F4.9
MeteringMode : Division
Flash : Fired(Auto/red-eye)
FocalLength : 23.10(mm)
MakerNote : Canon Format : 1264Bytes (Offset:688)
UserComment :
FlashPixVersion : 0100
ColorSpace : sRGB
ExifImageWidth : 1600
ExifImageHeight : 1200
FocalPlaneXResolution : 1600000/284
FocalPlaneYResolution : 1200000/213
FocalPlaneResolutionUnit : Meter
SensingMethod : OneChipColorArea sensor
FileSource : DSC
Vendor Original Information
MacroMode : Unknown (1792)
Self-timer : Unknown (256)
Quality : Unknown (0)
FlashMode : Off
Drive Mode : Unknown (92)
Focus Mode : One-Shot
ImageSize : Large
Easy shooting mode : Full auto
Digital Zoom : Unknown (4)
Contrast : -1
Saturation : +1
Sharpness : +8
CCD Sensitivity : Unknown (25)
MeteringMode : CenterWeightedAverage
FocusType : Manual
ExposureProgram : Easy shooting
Focal length of lens : 16385-1 Unit:0(mm)
Flash Activity : Unknown (23100)
Photo Effect : Unknown (49)
Color Tone : +3072
Unknown (0001)3,46 : 0000 0700 0100 0000 0000 005C 0002 0000 0003 0005 0000 0000 0004 FFFF 0001 0008 0019 0000 0000 0000 0000 000F 0003 0001 4001 0000 7FFF FFFF 5A3C 1E14 03E8 0093 00ED FFFF 2008 0000 0000 0000 0000 FFFF 0031 0C00 0C00 0000 0000 0000
Unknown (0002)3,4 : 0,32767,32767,1
Unknown (0003)3,4 : 0,2,23100,291
White Balance : Unknown (128)
Sequence number(Continuous mode) : 147
Flash bias : Unknown (6)
Unknown (0004)3,34 : 00DA 0000 0000 0000 0000 0044 0030 0080 FF69 0093 0060 0000 0000 0000 0000 0006 0000 0000 0110 0000 0000 0000 0000 0001 00F2 0000 0095 0060 0000 0000 0000 00FA 0000 0000
Unknown (0000)3,6 : 0,0,0,0,900,0
Image type : IMG
owerShotS
Firmware version : EGFirmwareVer
Image Number : 1002354
Owner name : on1.00
Unknown (000D)4,94 : 0,0,65536,131072,0,-26542080,-6225921,-6225921,65535,0,0,0,0,655360,-23396352,-26476545,29491199,0,-29294592,-23330817,33292287,65536,65536,29294592,1 7891328,0,12320768,9437184,0,3145728,131072,71499776,30801920,-262275072,262340607,89260032,34865152,89260032,262275072,0,0,89260032,34865152,-3532390 4,22020095,77332480,96665600,-35192832,21889023,1114112,68943872,154468352,93978624,68943872,65536,31457280,29425664,-29687808,36175871,18874368,-2621 44,65535,8388608,25100288,0,0,0,23855104,327680,0,0,0,0,196608,131072,25100288,34275328,45088768,0,8388608,25100288,-1649934336,327679,589824,34734080 ,29884416,40894464,43843584,15859712,34471936,26738688,23920640,39845888,1245184
Unknown (0010)4,1 : 26214400
Unknown (0000)3,9 : 0,10,0,14205,21810,0,0,0,0
Unknown (0012)3,28 : 0,0,0,0,0,9,9,1600,1200,1536,230,276,41,65260,0,276,65260,0,276,65260,0,276,65494,65494,65494,0,0,0
Unknown (0013)3,4 : 42,42,42,128
Unknown (0018)1,256 : 7
Unknown (0019)3,1 : 1
Unknown (001C)3,1 : 0
Unknown (001D)3,16 : 0,0,0,0,0,32,1,0,2,2,2,2,0,0,0,0
Unknown (001E)4,1 : 16779008
Thumbnail Information
Compression : OLDJPEG
XResolution : 180/1
YResolution : 180/1
ResolutionUnit : Inch
JPEGInterchangeFormat : 2326
JPEGInterchangeFormatLength : 1249


Taken between the 1st and 5th eh? Too bad that the pictures were taken on 11th January at 9:51 pm..

What's the betting that Gov_Leaker owns a Canon PowerShot SD550?


[edit on 25-2-2007 by Stoo]



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 11:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by Stoo
Taken between the 1st and 5th eh? Too bad that the pictures were taken on 11th January at 9:51 pm..

What's the betting that Gov_Leaker owns a Canon PowerShot SD550?


[edit on 25-2-2007 by Stoo]


AND is apparently from Staten Island.
to boot.


tic-toc (?)



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 11:22 AM
link   
I am having a vision....

We here will all soon see the Hammer of the Banning Gods.



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 11:22 AM
link   
I don't think *busted* even begins to cover it



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 11:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by 12m8keall2c
AND is apparently from Staten Island.
to boot.

tic-toc (?)









hmmmm.....



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 11:35 AM
link   
Man that gets boring.

cant you hoaxing losers try a little harder to fool us?

what about the idea to seperate this forum for the ones that want to seriously discuss the ufo phenomen and those that want to post silly pics?


or maybe a verificationprocess of new threads or a minimumnumber of points for threadstarters?


[edit on 25-2-2007 by hoeon]



posted on Feb, 25 2007 @ 11:37 AM
link   
Just a little heads up Gov_Leaker.






The staff and members of ATS tend to take the first rule of the terms and conditions very seriously.
You can review all the rules here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...



new topics

top topics



 
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join