It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by lizziex3
Well I think the most compelling piece of evidence is that Dylan Avery first wrote his documentary as a fictional movie
This is the most compelling piece of evidence that 9/11 wasn't an inside job?
Do you know what logic or reason are?
Originally posted by nick7261
Originally posted by Reality Hurts
So this, in a nutshell, is our whole argument Nick:
Nick: 911 was an inside job
Reality: Prove it.
Nick: I can't. The government has all of the evidence.
Reality: So you can't prove it?
Nick: You're a borderline idiot to ask me for proof.
So, in reality, all you can provide is an opinion, not evidence or proof...because the government has it. Any anyone who questions you is "bordering on idiotic"?
Am I correct?
That's pretty close to correct. Not exactly, but close.
First, I didn't say it was an inside job.
Second, I didn't say that anybody that questions me is "bordering on idiotic."
Let me clarify...
The government declared that it was *NOT* in any way an inside job, outside job, or any other job, except one pulled of by bin Laden, without presenting any solid evidence that bin Laden had anything to do with 9/11.
Further, the government refuses to release evidence that could factually prove, or disprove, their claims.
And yes, it is idiotic to ask me to provide the aforementioned evidence because I don't have it.
Oh... what would be really cool to have is the all the data from the Able Danger operation that the DoD ordered destroyed, but I guess nobody will ever see that. Well at least I can read the 9/11 Commission Report where they interviewed the guys from Able Danger. What? They didn't interview them? My bad...
Then I'd love to see what docs Sandy Berger stuffed in his socks or his pants or wherever he stashed them, but since they were cut up with scissors I guess I can't see those either.
I know! Just get me the steel beams from WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 to examine. That would be useful evidence to put to rest once and for all the whole debate about CD. Oops.... too late. They were cut up into little pieces just like the papers Berger stole.
Or maybe we could interview the guy at the FAA who ordered the ATC tower in Pittsburgh evacuated, then called the military and told them that the controllers lost track of Flight 93 over Pittsburgh.
I know! How about if we had the flight data recorders from the 4 planes! That would tell us something. What? They couldn't find them all?
Oh well... I guess we'll just have to take Uncle Sam's word for it about what happened on 9/11, and who did it, even if they don't have "grandiose evidence" to back up their claims.
Originally posted by Reality Hurts
Although, because you keep hammering the same points once they've been demonstrated to be invalid, I'm beginning to believe that you are more interested in being "internet cool" and trying to win this argument.
So again I say, the proof is out there, stop going down this disingenuous and myopic path and go get the real evidence.
Originally posted by GwionX
I am relieved that I am not the only one that sees far right wing extremist groups such as the skinheads and other neo-nazi like cults involved in the promotion and perpetuation of this fallacy that is the "truth movement."
Originally posted by Reality Hurts
The problem w/ many conspiracy theorists is that THEY, as the ones proposing a a theory that is contrary to established belief, are required to come up with empirical, tangible, and demonstrable proof.