It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lizziex3
Well I think the most compelling piece of evidence is that Dylan Avery first wrote his documentary as a fictional movie
Originally posted by nick7261
Lizzie, with all due respect, how would YOU know what was out of proportion and what wasn't? You seem to get all your information from reading CT and debunking sites?
How can you even comment on conspiracy vs. no-conspiracy when you've barely even heard of Able Danger. Maybe you should do some real, independent research before passing judgement on others.
And by independent research, I mean from initial sources, not from web sites that cite other sources.
(snip)
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by lizziex3
Well I think the most compelling piece of evidence is that Dylan Avery first wrote his documentary as a fictional movie
This is the most compelling piece of evidence that 9/11 wasn't an inside job?
Do you know what logic or reason are?
Originally posted by lizziex3
I already responded to this and I am now going to delete that post because that is not what I ment.
Originally posted by lizziex3
I have done just as much if not more so research on this topic as the Truthers have.
If that makes me closed minded then I guess i'm closed minded. I am now going to stop debating and just leave the links in my first post for people that want them.
energy, KWH source or sink
+ 111,000 falling of mass (1.97e11 g falling average of 207 m)
- 135,000 crushing of concrete (9e10 g to 60 micron powder)
ignoring water vaporization
- 400,000 heating of gasses (2e9 g air from 300 to 1020 K)
- 11,300,000 heating of suspended concrete (9e10 g from 300 to 1020 K)
assuming water vaporization sink was not supply-limited
- 1,496,000 vaporization of water (2.38e9 g water)
- 41,000 heating of gasses (2e9 g air from 300 to 373 K)
- 1,145,000 heating of suspended concrete (9e10 g from 300 to 373 K)
Originally posted by lizziex3
I do not believe the government is telling us the whole truth. [...] I believe it was done by Al-queda/OBL. with or without our own governments OK I am not sure. [...] oh, and i do believe that the US hasn't cought Bin Laden because they don't need him right now.
[edit on 25-2-2007 by lizziex3]
Originally posted by lizziex3
Well I see this question was already answered in your thread, and it seems to me that you're not going to believe any other explaination than the one you already believe.
Your story does the same thing. You nitpick until theres one tiny thing that doesn't quite make sense, and then blow it out of porportion.
Originally posted by nick7261
I've heard this argument over and over, and it strikes me as totally disingenuous. How can anybody show *proof* like you suggest if the government confiscated all the evidence??
Originally posted by Reality Hurts
Which argument? The "Show me one iota of tangible evidence". That is not an argument. It is a rational response to a proposal. Sorry, but grandiose claims require grandiose evidence. The onus is upon you to provide it.
Originally posted by Reality Hurts
Originally posted by nick7261
I've heard this argument over and over, and it strikes me as totally disingenuous. How can anybody show *proof* like you suggest if the government confiscated all the evidence??
Which argument? The "Show me one iota of tangible evidence". That is not an argument. It is a rational response to a proposal. Sorry, but grandiose claims require grandiose evidence. The onus is upon you to provide it.
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
Reality does indeed hurt
Originally posted by Reality Hurts
So this, in a nutshell, is our whole argument Nick:
Nick: 911 was an inside job
Reality: Prove it.
Nick: I can't. The government has all of the evidence.
Reality: So you can't prove it?
Nick: You're a borderline idiot to ask me for proof.
So, in reality, all you can provide is an opinion, not evidence or proof...because the government has it. Any anyone who questions you is "bordering on idiotic"?
Am I correct?