It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Real Talk about White Privilege

page: 11
12
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 4 2007 @ 01:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic

Originally posted by dollmonster
But, the only thing that makes sense is that you left something out of the story.

That's the only thing that makes sense to me.


Hey, I recognize that good old "denial card" being played -- If dollmonster is saying that blacks got the advantage because they were black, then she must have left something out (in other words, lied).

:shk:
How narrow minded of you to assume I lied because you don't believe me. It happened just as I said. He was the only person identified and arrested from the brawl that night. Had the police actually cared about making more arrests, they could have done a little more investigating. But I couldn't care less if you or anyone else believes this or not.






posted on Mar, 4 2007 @ 01:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by dollmonster
How narrow minded of you to assume I lied because you don't believe me. It happened just as I said. He was the only person identified and arrested from the brawl that night. Had the police actually cared about making more arrests, they could have done a little more investigating. But I couldn't care less if you or anyone else believes this or not.


I screwed up the quote tags. I was actually talking to truthseeka... on your behalf. I was saying that since HE said:


Originally posted by truthseeka
Dollmonster...

I don't know what all happened with your son. But, the only thing that makes sense is that you left something out of the story.


He was saying that since your son was the only one punished, you weren't telling the whole story. So I MEANT to say HE was playing the denial card.

Forgive me for messing up the quote tags, but don't you know how I feel about this already??? Have you read any of my posts???



posted on Mar, 5 2007 @ 02:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by phoenixhasrisin

Originally posted by BHI didn't think my brother in law was funny. In fact, I was always very uncomfortable with his little "jokes". I said he was trying to be funny, not that I thought he was funny. Just to be clear.

I think that's good. But you need to see what I am trying to get at here.

What you described is not unlike much that I have witnessed as being a half breed. Many white people are very cordial to other races to their faces. But, as soon as they are amongst themselves, the jokes begin, and I have had the unfortunate experience of hearing this first hand because as they later said: "They didn't think I was black".

I have to comment on this part.

People that make jokes, etc., when amongst themselves are most likely trying to save face and avoid embarassment from some previous episode. It's a sign of personal insecurity and does not point to any systemic or widespread racism.



posted on Mar, 5 2007 @ 08:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by jsobecky
You certainly aren't talking about me avoiding the topic, are you, truthceeca? Because I addressed this earlier on in this thread:


Originally posted by jsobecky
Today's version of white privilege is probably nothing more than "circling the wagons" in response to the advantages being given to non-whites.

I see nothing wrong with white privilege, as long as it doesn't break any laws.


No, I'm not.

I have nothing to say to you. You acknowledge that it exists, but, more importantly, you are HAPPY that it does. Why should I respond to something like that? Why should I?

When someone is HAPPY that they are given things because they're white, yet ironically is OPPOSED to someone getting things because they're not white, why should I say something? People who share your sentiments, yet have more power than you, are the ones who keep this crap going. As far as your reasoning,
.

You care to tell me when AA FIRST debuted? I'm sure white privilege didn't have more than a 300 year head start in America...right?



posted on Mar, 5 2007 @ 09:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by jsobecky
The south was only comprised of a handful of states, not a continent. More like a small region of a large country.


Who said it was a continent?
They wanted to secede from the Union. What part of that don't you understand?


And the same can be said about every piece of land on earth throughout history. So what?


Your cavalier attitude about this speaks volumes. Not only do you minimize slavery and genocide in the formation of the US, you ignore the crucial role racism played in the foundation of America. Well, you can't ignore this: who was referenced, no, EXCLUDED in the "all men are created equal" rhetoric?




So, go ahead. Argue "white privilege". I already told you that I see nothing wrong with it. And any time I get the chance to use it to my advantage, I will. Does that make me a racist? About as much as taking advantage of AA makes you a racist.


Don't push your personality traits on me.
For one, comparing AA and WP is apples and oranges; a look at the length of time these practices have been in place is one SMALL
indication of this. Two, I haven't benefitted from AA. I know you like to pretend I'm not capable of getting anywhere without AA, but whatever. Guess that's what people like you tell yourselves to make yourselves feel better.

And three, AA is NOT equal to non-white privilege, as I already said.
Why not? Because WHITE WOMEN benefit from AA too!

Don't worry, becky. You've clarified everything I've suspected of you. You're like the whites who walk the other way when I'm approaching them, or the ones who cram themselves against the elevator wall when riding with me, or the ones who move 10 feet away from me when they pull out their money, or the ones who start shaking in their shoes when I ask them something.

I'm starting to roll with the punches, now. I jump at whites who show fear in their eyes. You should see them fall all over themselves when I do this.
I move towards whites who start going the other way, as well as those who move away in the elevator or move to count their money. Funny, they never say anything when I do this, they just move around.

And, why not? I'm not a criminal, thug, gangsta, or whatever, but I'll be treated like this for the rest of my days. Why not have fun with the inevitable? I should get video of this one day...
(my bad for the sidetrack, mods, but I felt like saying this)

[edit on 5-3-2007 by truthseeka]



posted on Mar, 5 2007 @ 10:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by wagnerian21
White priviledge is a LIE.


This one's for you, guy (mostly). More examples to come...

This is from a study conducted by sociologist Devah Pager in 2003. I'm having trouble putting the graph in question on here, so you'll have to settle for words and numbers.

She used sets of 4 college students, 2 black and 2 white, who represented themselves as high school graduates as they applied for entry level jobs suited to high school graduates. Both members within each group had a "criminal record" assigned to them during the study. She sent them to look for jobs, in order to determine any discrimination based on jail time or race.

From Devah Pager, "The Mark of a Criminal Record:"


Figure 6 [the graph in question] presents the percentage of callbacks received for both categories of black testers relative to those for whites. The effect of race in these findings is strikingly large. Among blacks without criminal records, only 14% received callbacks, relative to 34% of white noncriminals (P.01). In fact, even whites with criminal records received more favorable treatment (17%) than blacks without criminal records (14%).

The rank ordering of groups in this graph is painfully revealing of employer preferences: race continues to play a dominant role in shaping employment
opportunities, equal to or greater than the impact of a criminal record.


In case you were wondering about the numbers:

White male, no jail time - 34% call back rate
Black male, no jail time - 14% call back rate
White male, jail time - 17% call back rate
Black male, jail time - 5% call back rate

As you can see, in this study black males with no criminal record had less call back rates than their white counterparts; more importantly, they were NO BETTER OFF than whites who had done time. Of course, we already knew what the call back rate would be for black males with jail time...


I'll have more for you later...unless you don't want to read LIES about white privilege.



posted on Mar, 5 2007 @ 11:21 PM
link   
Anyone can spin numbers.


Of course, OPM doesn't call it "over hiring" of minorities. They call it "meeting or exceeding affirmative action goals."


www.adversity.net...

TOmato-toMAto....



posted on Mar, 5 2007 @ 11:48 PM
link   
Well, truthseeka, you're the one who said you wanted to shove "White priivilege" in people's faces, now weren't you? But when it comes back at you, you can't take it, can you?



posted on Mar, 6 2007 @ 12:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by truthseeka
When someone is HAPPY that they are given things because they're white, yet ironically is OPPOSED to someone getting things because they're not white, why should I say something? People who share your sentiments, yet have more power than you, are the ones who keep this crap going.

Hey, take what is offered and given to you because you're black. You'd be a fool not to. But don't then turn around and cry about "White Privilege".



Originally posted by truthseeka

Originally posted by jsobecky
The south was only comprised of a handful of states, not a continent. More like a small region of a large country.


Who said it was a continent?
They wanted to secede from the Union. What part of that don't you understand?


And the same can be said about every piece of land on earth throughout history. So what?


Your cavalier attitude about this speaks volumes. Not only do you minimize slavery and genocide in the formation of the US, you ignore the crucial role racism played in the foundation of America. Well, you can't ignore this: who was referenced, no, EXCLUDED in the "all men are created equal" rhetoric?


Once again, you are exaggerating. There was no "genocide".

It's terms like that, and the fact that a very small percentage of people were affected for a very short period of time, in a very small part of the world, that reveals your argument for the overblown drama that you want it to be.



posted on Mar, 6 2007 @ 07:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by wagnerian21

Originally posted by riley
Truthseeka,

If white privilege exists.. why are their millions of whites living below the poverty line? They are obviously not privileged.. care to explain why they are not benefitting from having white skin?


Don`t bother.....anyone who raises a legit point in this thread that he happens to disagree with, he`ll either conviently ignore or he`ll try to engage in character assassination, as I showed in my earlier post. This is logic he can`t conceivably refute. Therefore, he`ll ignore it.

Seems you were right..

It`s a damn good point though, and rest assured that you aren`t the only one who sees it.

White priviledge is a LIE.

Perhaps he didn't see it? I said it on page 1 as well:

Originally posted by riley
As for white privilege.. when the millions of whites living under the poverty line suddenly dissapear you might have a point.

Even though I'm not the only one who's made the point.. perhaps he's still not aware of it. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and ask again:

Truthseeka,

If white privilege exists.. why are their millions of whites living below the poverty line? They are obviously not privileged.. care to explain why they are not benefitting from having white skin?


[edit on 6-3-2007 by riley]



posted on Mar, 6 2007 @ 07:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by truthseeka
I jump at whites who show fear in their eyes. You should see them fall all over themselves when I do this.
I move towards whites who start going the other way, as well as those who move away in the elevator or move to count their money. ... And, why not?


Since YOU asked why not ...

Because it's ignorant and a damned immature thing to do. Instead of acting like a civlilized human being and helping to dispell errors in thinking, you perpetuate and confirm them with this kind of behavior. This behavior makes it hard for other black people. By your behavior you are causing more problems for black people in general. Congratulations.

Your off-topic confession about being an unrepentant racist punk says a alot. :shk:

BTW .. as far as 'counts their money' in public - If someone is at an ATM and is checking their withdrawl from the machine it is common sense and common courtesy to give them the privacy to do so. And if people move away from you, it is most likely because of (*drumroll*) ... you. Seriously ... do you have body odor? Try using Sure deodorant and change your attitude (cuz it stinks). Don't try to blame whitey for your attitude or for the responses you get to it. It's your own choice to act like a punk instead of an adult. Excercising some black privilege??


Originally posted by riley
If white privilege exists.. why are their millions of whites living below the poverty line? They are obviously not privileged.. care to explain why they are not benefitting from having white skin?


Still waiting for an answer, eh Riley? I have found that many times these questions that point out flaws in the premise of the OP never get answered.

edited once for spelling


[edit on 3/6/2007 by FlyersFan]



posted on Mar, 6 2007 @ 08:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by Dock6
.

WHICH 'white privilege' ?

If a 'white' breaks the law, he pays the penalty.

If a 'white' behaves suspiciously within a store, he attracts the attention and scrutiny of security.

Some 'whites' rise to prominence, fame, wealth --- and many do not, despite their efforts.

'Whites' suffer poverty, denial of justice, hardship in the same way as those who regard themselves as non-white.

'Whites' are subjected to competitive. often unfair environments, lifelong.

The only difference between 'whites' and 'non whites' is the fact that 'WHITES' are not provided the opportunity to blame 'non whites' for their predicament ! Unless they're the 'whites' who ARE being and have been butchered by 'non whites' in places such as Africa, perhaps.




WRONG!!! I am a white man who was married into a black family and I witnessed first hand what white privilege is. I was called down to the police station once to pick up my oldest step son. Seems he had been hanging out with his white friends (this was in Maine in the 80's when blacks composed .1% of the population) when the cops stopped and searched them. A little pot was found on one of the other (white) kids but the police did not arrest the kid they found it on, they arrested my step-son, solely because he was black. We got the whole thing thrown out and the officers reprimanded, but if I had been black, that boy would have ended up in jail.



posted on Mar, 6 2007 @ 10:02 AM
link   
Are we not in the 21 st century .... Let it go bro .... let it go ... it has been 20 years ... There were alot of things that were different then ... We just begin having Color TV's ... People were wathcing TV IN BLACK AND WHITE STILL ... Shouldn't that be enough Excuse !!!! Anyways ... I don't know why I didn't just say this in the first place ... Totally DEBUNK this .. White's have prvledges ... I am 23 ... Just got engaged ... Me and my fiance' can't get a loan for a house ... So we are living in an Efficiency apartment right now in which we pay $350 a month for ... I cannot get financed without a cosigner ... Yet, my black friends have no problem getting financed for a Home Loan .... Actually two of them SPECIFICALLY ... have HUD grants ... www.hud.gov... ... It is total BS that I cannot get a loan that is close to that .. I actually went to a bank and spoke with a lady ... that does this type of thing all day long ... She said it should be no problem to get a FHA loan from the Government for a First Time Home Buyer ... Yet ... I still had to check that little box that she said had alot of affect on the loan ... And yes ... It might as well read White ... check here ... EVERYONE ELSE check here ... I am so privledged ... Pretty sad I have been working this job for 4 years and can't get anyone to finance me a house so I am stuck throwing my money in the trash ... (RENTING) ... yes, I am so happy I am white .. Actually I wish I was full blood INDIAN .. I would really have some awesome oportunities such as Casinos ... or GRANTS .... or Free School ... .... I think this thread should be change ... Real Talk about Indians Over Privledged ................


So the 80's huh ???


Originally posted by grover

Originally posted by Dock6
.

WHICH 'white privilege' ?

If a 'white' breaks the law, he pays the penalty.

If a 'white' behaves suspiciously within a store, he attracts the attention and scrutiny of security.

Some 'whites' rise to prominence, fame, wealth --- and many do not, despite their efforts.

'Whites' suffer poverty, denial of justice, hardship in the same way as those who regard themselves as non-white.

'Whites' are subjected to competitive. often unfair environments, lifelong.

The only difference between 'whites' and 'non whites' is the fact that 'WHITES' are not provided the opportunity to blame 'non whites' for their predicament ! Unless they're the 'whites' who ARE being and have been butchered by 'non whites' in places such as Africa, perhaps.




WRONG!!! I am a white man who was married into a black family and I witnessed first hand what white privilege is. I was called down to the police station once to pick up my oldest step son. Seems he had been hanging out with his white friends (this was in Maine in the 80's when blacks composed .1% of the population) when the cops stopped and searched them. A little pot was found on one of the other (white) kids but the police did not arrest the kid they found it on, they arrested my step-son, solely because he was black. We got the whole thing thrown out and the officers reprimanded, but if I had been black, that boy would have ended up in jail.



posted on Mar, 6 2007 @ 10:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by riley
Truthseeka,

If white privilege exists.. why are their millions of whites living below the poverty line? They are obviously not privileged.. care to explain why they are not benefitting from having white skin?


[edit on 6-3-2007 by riley]


Had you paid attention earlier in the thread, you would see why I'm ignoring you. Let's try it again...

White privilege is not all about money. Did you see it THIS time?

There's another figure I'm looking for right now. It compares wealth accumulation in poor blacks, whites, and Hispanics. And, surprise surprise
, the poor whites are NOT poor when compared to the poor Hispanics and blacks.

Try again, riley. Btw, you have any idea why that study I cited showed that black males with no criminal record are NO BETTER OFF than whites with criminal records? Couldn't be white privilege, could it?



posted on Mar, 6 2007 @ 10:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by FlyersFan
Since YOU asked why not ...

Because it's ignorant and a damned immature thing to do. Instead of acting like a civlilized human being and helping to dispell errors in thinking, you perpetuate and confirm them with this kind of behavior. This behavior makes it hard for other black people. By your behavior you are causing more problems for black people in general. Congratulations.


Please.

I should be more civilized like the whites who brand me a criminal because of my skin color...right.
And, my new behavior doesn't make it harder for black people; the people who do this crap to me and other black people make it harder for black people.


I have friends and relatives who can tell you the EXACT same thing. Some white people see them as criminals/thugs/drug dealers/users/dangerous, DESPITE not knowing a DAMN thing about them. They don't do this thing I do now, though.

I'm not going to suck up to some idiot who thinks I'm going to rob them; be all "Gee, lady, I was JUST waiting to pay for my food. I'm not going to steal from you. I'm a GOOD Negro."
Please.



Your off-topic confession about being an unrepentant racist punk says a alot. :shk:


If that's what you call someone tired of being treated like a criminal, DESPITE having no criminal record whatsoEVER, so be it.




BTW .. as far as 'counts their money' in public - If someone is at an ATM and is checking their withdrawl from the machine it is common sense and common courtesy to give them the privacy to do so. And if people move away from you, it is most likely because of (*drumroll*) ... you. Seriously ... do you have body odor? Try using Sure deodorant and change your attitude (cuz it stinks). Don't try to blame whitey for your attitude or for the responses you get to it. It's your own choice to act like a punk instead of an adult. Excercising some black privilege??


You need to practice reading. I said at stores/restaurants, NOT at ATMs. Your attempt to portray me as someone hovering by as you get your cash out of an ATM says a lot about YOU.:shk:

And no, I don't have the "n.igger stink" you OBVIOUSLY are referring to.


This joke will put a lot of this in perspective for you.

What do you call a black man in a three-piece suit?
Defendant.

As long as some white people see me as a N.IGGER, no matter if they have no idea who I am, I will take out my frustration on them and make them look stupid. Shows how all the "color-blind" rhetoric is taurus feces in most cases.


[edit on 6-3-2007 by truthseeka]



posted on Mar, 6 2007 @ 10:38 AM
link   
Show me this STUDY !!!!!!!!!!!! ... O you are just pulling that outta your ...Ear ??? Show me the Study ... O yeah .. I did this study once that showed ... Dolphins with darker skin color got aten more by sharks than the lighter colored ones ... Maybe they have some of that White Privledge out there ... and that has nothing to to with MONEY ... It has to do with Value of Life .. and no matter what you say ... OH WAIT ... You did come back to saying that it ALL HAS TO DO WITH MONEY after saying that it has nothing to do with MONEY .... WHO IS CONTRADICTING THIERSELVES ???


Originally posted by truthseeka

Originally posted by riley
Truthseeka,

If white privilege exists.. why are their millions of whites living below the poverty line? They are obviously not privileged.. care to explain why they are not benefitting from having white skin?


[edit on 6-3-2007 by riley]


Had you paid attention earlier in the thread, you would see why I'm ignoring you. Let's try it again...

White privilege is not all about money.,/I> Did you see it THIS time?

There's another figure I'm looking for right now. It compares wealth accumulation in poor blacks, whites, and Hispanics. And, surprise surprise
, the poor whites are NOT poor when compared to the poor Hispanics and blacks. NOW WHY WOUDL YO GO BACK AND SAY THIS after just saying what you said BEFORE ???

Try again, riley. Btw, you have any idea why that study I cited showed that black males with no criminal record are NO BETTER OFF than whites with criminal records? Couldn't be white privilege, could it?



Are we going in CIRCLES HERE .... You can say what you want .. Truth you make what you wanna make outta your life ... if you sit around saying oh .. I am a poor Black soul who gets mistreated ... Guess what .. Mistreatement is on its way !!!! Guess what if you go out and work hard everyday trying to get all you can ... Guess what ... YOU REAP WHAT YOU SOW ... and I know I probably wasn't paying attention earlier in this thread to something .. or you can come in and say OH this or OH THAT .. But the point is ... that you are one of the poor people that keep blacks into the SLAVERY that they are in .... and it is within themsleves !!!!!!! SO GROW up ... Keep on with the inquisitions ..........

[edit on 6-3-2007 by Deus_Brandon]



posted on Mar, 6 2007 @ 11:25 AM
link   
Face it. Whites have been historically privileged in America. A look at the books can verify this.

Chinese Exclusion Act

An example of a blatantly racist law that lasted for a long time. I mean, the very NAME shows the racism. A comparison with the next law shows white privilege.

Naturalization act of 1790

Excerpt from the act:


..any alien, being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for a term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof.


Another blatantly racist law. Citizenship to the US (ironically in a country inhabited by non-Europeans at the SAME TIME) was restricted to whites. Even free blacks were excluded. So, we can see that white immigrants could become citizens in the US by virtue of their skin color. The white privilege is too obvious here.

The infamous Dred Scott decision of 1856 is one of a number of the Supreme Court's disgustingly racist rulings. From the ruling:


A free Negro of the African race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the Constitution of the United States...Consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them.


The white privilege could not be clearer from this ruling. Black people, free or slaves, were NOT citizens of the US. So, the special rights and immunities (PRIVILEGES) were NOT granted to people of African descent. Interesting.

Another nasty contribution from the Supreme Court was the Plessy v. Ferguson decision of 1896. The infamous "separate but equal" crap comes from this ruling. Jim Crow and segregation CLEARLY shows white privilege; the separate life, basically, for whites was QUITE privileged, compared to life under Jim Crow for blacks.

It's amazing that most of the white responders to this thread say white privilege doesn't exist when the US was FOUNDED, in large part, on the principles of white supremacy and white privilege.:shk:

[edit on 6-3-2007 by truthseeka]

[edit on 6-3-2007 by truthseeka]



posted on Mar, 6 2007 @ 11:30 AM
link   
Noone is here to ARGUE History with you bro ... Yes ... the TV set you sit in front of used to be in Black and White ... Why not Blue and White ... Why not ... Green and Yellow ? Were they trying to say something ... Possibly .. The FACTS are .. Who CARES you cannot change the past ... the future is yours ... Well you must stop living in the past first .... Talk to the Japanese about the Nuclear Warheads hitting them if you want to talk about something that we have done that had affected generations to come ... Their kids were coming out deformed or what not for a while ... And here you are trying to tell me that Slavery has held down the Slaves .... If it weren't for the whole slave trade most of the blacks would not even BE here .. Which in some peoples eyes would make for a better America ... Those people need to WAKE THE F' UP ....... Because there are much more of us that know unified we make one HELL OF A COUNTRY ! Apart we are just a dying CAUSE ...............



Originally posted by truthseeka
Face it. Whites have been historically privileged in America. A look at the books can verify this.



posted on Mar, 6 2007 @ 12:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by truthseeka
You need to practice reading. I said at stores/restaurants, NOT at ATMs.


No truthseeka. YOU need to practice reading. THIS is your exact quote -


Originally posted by truthseeka
or the ones who move 10 feet away from me when they pull out their money,


ATMs, stores, restaurants ... it's all the same. People who are getting money from an ATM or who are paying in a store or restaurant deserve privacy and space while doing so. When people around me take out their money to pay, or take money out of an ATM, or WHATEVER .. I give them plenty of space and privacy. It's common sense and it's good manners.

And as far as elevators go .. no one goes into an elevator and gets cozy with the people inside. When ever ANYONE goes on or gets in .. everyone makes plenty of room. NO ONE likes to get cozy in an elevator. It's a 'my space' thing ...

You are looking for problems where there aren't any. I think you WANT to be treated badly just so you can go and 'scare a white person' and get all giggly about it afterwards.



Originally posted by truthseeka
I don't have the "n.igger stink" you OBVIOUSLY are referring to.



WRONG. I wasn't referring to that at all. That's the SECOND time you have done this. You get all riled up thinking someone says something .. when they don't. Remember the comment you made - that you would smack me because you thought I said you didn't take care of your kids? You were wrong then and you are wrong now. Wonder how many other things you are wrong about that you think are 'OBVIOUS'. Probably plenty.

YOU said people move away from you all the time.
Common sense says it's YOU that is the problem.


and make them look stupid.


Behave however, you want .. but it doesn't make white people look stupid. It just makes you look like a racist punk. Whatever. Enjoy yourself.



posted on Mar, 6 2007 @ 12:33 PM
link   
Hey truth...

you could get a job here....
www.adversity.net...


Kodak's aggressive, forced-diversity policies and procedures actively exclude non-minority employees, suppliers and subcontractors

or here......
www.adversity.net...

or here.....
www.adversity.net...


FitzGerald was repeatedly told he could not be hired for certain jobs within McDonald's because those jobs had been reserved exclusively for non-whites. (McDonald's calls these quota-jobs "diversity positions".)



but hey....all in the name of "diversity" right

[edit on 6/3/2007 by shooterbrody]



new topics

top topics



 
12
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join