niiice

will watch soon

Interesting, and I do appreciate all your hard work and your skills of production.

I'm also looking forward to the sequel.

I'm watching it, I get as far as the bloke who works in the garage, less than 25% and it stops, tells me its buffering and stays at 0%, tried to start over and same. Teething probs? MIB?

Looks good so far.

Still getting the same 10 mins later, real shame, i settled in to watch that. Look foward to seeing it through.

[edit on 22/2/2007 by Now_Then]

Good job Jack!

I'm gonna wait until I get home to watch this so I can pay close attention, but here's a preemptive WATS.

You have voted Jack Tripper for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have one more vote left for this month.

Let us know as soon as we can watch it on Google Video!! Can't wait

Perhaps you can make the video available as a down load, rather than having to stream it?

how about a little detail about the video, so I can choose if I want to spend time enough to watch it...

whats in it, what should I look for etc...

Glad to see you finally made it back!

Not being a suck, I just remember all the work you done before and it was detailed and interesting so I am obviously looking forward to watching this video.

impossible to watch you need to give a downloadable link.
The beginning its too long.
I would have used also something with more effect for individuals that know nothing about 911 truth.
For example rumsfield video talking about the missile and the weird coincidence of the same company having ppl in 3 different planes.
And from there a picture of the lawn of the pentagon and from there on you make your case.
Like this its way to much documentary ppl will get bored IMO.
A little more action at the beginning.

Very interesting film. I look forward to watching the researcher's edition. The interviewer tended to be a bit leading but none of the witnesses bit on the leads. Clearly the plane flew on the north side of the Citgo station. That seems all but certain. The two officers' testamony was iron-clad. The plane flew north. It is completely impossible that it downed the light poles. 0% chance. Good work folks.

I'm going to wait for the film to be posted on google video. I have a feeling it's going to great.

Google video will be up within a couple hours.

Originally posted by jtma508
Very interesting film. I look forward to watching the researcher's edition. The interviewer tended to be a bit leading but none of the witnesses bit on the leads. Clearly the plane flew on the north side of the Citgo station. That seems all but certain. The two officers' testamony was iron-clad. The plane flew north. It is completely impossible that it downed the light poles. 0% chance. Good work folks.

Smart guy!

I have a question. Could it be possible that the force of the air from the aircraft pushed the light poles over in that area if the plane was to the north of the Citgo? People say that if the plane was that low, then the cars on the road should have been pushed over. Couldn't the same have happened to the light poles?

I can't wait for the google version. (can't seem to watch it on the website )

Tried to watch, keeps messing up. Wait for google release (and remove divx from my computer! it don't agree)

I have a couple questions myself.

Refering to the diagram below:

Can anyone explain why the pilot or pilots of AA 77 diverted from his/her flight path near the driving range? If his/her responsibility was to close on the pentagon on a flight path that would match the planted light pole evidence and column destruction pattern in the building, he/she was on course at the driving range, and could have easily maintained the planned "deception trajectory". Why divert to the north of CITGO?

Second, Are there any pilots out there with 757 time who can tell us whether the turn radii required to follow the blue flight path would be theoretically possible in a 757 @ 350 kts?