The Americans would still be in Iraq and generally trying to dominate the world. Please stop using George Bush as a scapegoat.

Originally posted by superpaul55
The Americans would still be in Iraq and generally trying to dominate the world. Please stop using George Bush as a scapegoat.

I am sorry, I did not mean to use bush as a scapegoat.(I know he is kept in the dark.) I was just thinking about the the laws he has signed may not be valid.

it does not really matter, he was sworn in. too bad you are only now asking this question.

What if al gore won in 2000?

This web site would be in Arabic, not English, for one.

Originally posted by superpaul55
The Americans would still be in Iraq

That statement is highly contentious. Especially considering Gore was against the overthrow of Iraq.

i thought it was reasonably common knowledge that he stole both elections. Illegal elections, illegal laws, illegal genocide (cough, sorry i mean wars)...would it really be that surprising that had no right to do any of it?

In a way it's a good thing Bush is president. Because he's such a terrible lair people automatically distrust him. Real politicians are a lot more slick. Can fool more people.



[edit on 22-2-2007 by Awake and All Seeing]

If Al Gore was president, the war machine would've probably found a different reason to go to war. War = profits for big corporations, especially defense contractors and international banks.