Stealth bill makes declaring martial law easier, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times
Topic started on 21-2-2007 @ 02:41 PM by grover

Stealth bill makes declaring martial law easier


Source Link: www.truthout.org
Making Martial Law Easier
The New York Times Editorial

Monday 19 February 2007

A disturbing recent phenomenon in Washington is that laws that strike to the heart of American democracy have been passed in the dead of night. So it was with a provision quietly tucked into the enormous defense budget bill at the Bush administration's behest that makes it easier for a president to override local control of law enforcement and declare martial law.

The provision, signed into law in October, weakens two obscure but important bulwarks of liberty. One is the doctrine that bars military forces, including a federalized National Guard, from engaging in law enforcement. Called posse comitatus, it was enshrined in law after the Civil War to preserve the line between civil government and the military. The other is the Insurrection Act of 1807, which provides the major exemptions to posse comitatus. It essentially limits a president's use of the military in law enforcement to putting down lawlessness, insurrection and rebellion, where a state is violating federal law or depriving people of constitutional rights.

The newly enacted provisions upset this careful balance. They shift the focus from making sure that federal laws are enforced to restoring public order. Beyond cases of actual insurrection, the president may now use military troops as a domestic police force in response to a natural disaster, a disease outbreak, terrorist attack or to any "other condition."

Changes of this magnitude should be made only after a thorough public airing. But these new presidential powers were slipped into the law without hearings or public debate. The president made no mention of the changes when he signed the measure, and neither the White House nor Congress consulted in advance with the nation's governors.

There is a bipartisan bill, introduced by Senators Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, and Christopher Bond, Republican of Missouri, and backed unanimously by the nation's governors, that would repeal the stealthy revisions. Congress should pass it. If changes of this kind are proposed in the future, they must get a full and open debate.
(visit the link for the full news article)

Related News Links:
www.nytimes.com

Is there anything that this pathetic little egotist, aka bush minor, won't do to this country?

All republics and democracies are fragile constructs and historically tend to last a couple hundred years maximum but so far we have beat the odds. There is a time and a place for martial law, such as in periods of great social unrest or some natural catastrophe but for a society such as ours to remain healthy, they need to be short and most importantly, above board, which this law certainly is not. It really makes me wonder if the little twerp even intends to step down in 08.

Of course there are those fools who will salute this move without thinking out the consequences; just like there are those, safely in their armchairs who are gung ho for any and all war we get involved in regardless of how we got there.

[edit on 21-2-2007 by grover]

[edit on 21-2-2007 by grover]


reply posted on 21-2-2007 @ 04:16 PM by Justin Oldham
Here's a relevent thread I started some time ago about The Future of the Posse Comitatus Act that you may find useful in this discussion.

There's a been a sneaky trend in government under way for quite some time now that I and others have been warning against. The Shape Of Things To Come is my CM thread that explains my thinking.

This trend towards greater centralization of power means just one thing. We are fast approaching the day when a U.S. President will feel suitably compelled to overstep their Constitutional authority. As I have maintained in my published work, this time is not far off. It's quite likely that whoever the next President is, they will be the one who initiates the crisis.

The fact of the matter is that our leaders have been exploiting terrorism for the purposes of increasing Federal power, which they hope to keep even after the crisis has passed. There are more laws in the planning stages that will be implemented as the opportunity presents itself.

The looting of America will continue for as long as it remains profitable. Some laws, like this one will be changed with the stroke of a pen to suite the purposes of the people who now seek total power.

Having said all this, I've got to confess that I'm still an optimist. Forthe time being, we still have a few options which the dark powers that be haven't seen fit to take away from us. Does it get worse? Yes. It gets much worse. Until we start having these conversations behind razor wire, we will still have time and opportunity to act. Do we accept this and go quietly, or, do we do...something else?


reply posted on 21-2-2007 @ 08:10 PM by shooterbrody
Our government has done many things in the time since sept 11th in the name of "security" and "fighting terrorism".

Here are a few of interest:
1) H.R. 1268 - Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami Relief, 2005 (Enrolled as Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate)
- This bill includes a section that was once the Real ID Act.
2) H.R. 3162 - Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001 (Enrolled as Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate)
3) S. 3622 - North American Investment Fund Act (Introduced in Senate)
- To authorize the President to negotiate the creation of a North American Investment Fund between the Governments of Canada, of Mexico, and of the United States to increase the economic competitiveness of North America in a global economy.
4) H.R. 3930 - Military Commissions Act of 2006 (Enrolled as Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate)
- This bill authorizes trial by military commission for violations of the law of war, and for other purposes.
5) H.R. 5122 - John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Enrolled as Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate)
- This bill authorizes the President of the United States to declare Martial Law on the United States of American, and allows the President to bypass the Pose Comitatus Act.

A link to a site where we monitor our rights
www.mkcaf.us...

I have written letters, I have met personally with my congressional rep. He knows how I feel about these issues. If our leaders do not hear outrage from normal American citizens all these infringements on our rights,that did not exist before sept. 11th, will pass unopposed.


reply posted on 21-2-2007 @ 08:52 PM by Infoholic
I asked my Congressional representative on his big "listening tour", about H.R. 5122 - John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007, and his response was:

Me: "Mr. Congressman, could you elaborate on H.R. 5122 - John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007, please?"

Congressman: "I'm not familiar with that bill."

Me: "Mr. Congressman, you voted to pass this bill."

Congressman: *shaking head* "I'm... I'm... I'm..."

Me: "Mr. Congressman, do you understand that this bill authorizes the President to use the military within US borders?"

Congressman: "Uhhh... I'm not sure of what...."

Me: "Doesn't this bill actually nullify the posse comitatus act?"

Congressman: "Oh, yea, that bill....."


They know what they are doing, folks. Don't let them kid you. Those in Congress today are not going to explain to the general public of what's in the bills they put together... either they know what they are signing for and they don't want the public opposition, or they have no clue... of which they should be thrown out on their a$$'s by us... the people.

If you'd like to keep track of what bills are being introduced and what's going on... go here:


House Floor Summary - What's happened on the floor most recently (motions)
Yesterday in Congress - Bills introduced (most recent)
Daily Digest - Summary of the Congressional Floor.

Find your House Representative - Visit your representative's website and contact, contact, and contact them some more.
Find your Senate Representative - Visit your representative's website and contact, contact, and contact them some more.


reply posted on 21-2-2007 @ 09:38 PM by jsobecky
Originally posted by Justin Oldham
Here's a relevent thread I started some time ago about The Future of the Posse Comitatus Act that you may find useful in this discussion.

In your post,you state that an "unwritten tradition" was not followed irt Gen. Hayden's nomination and appointment. From that, you speculate that there is a conspiracy to nullify Posse Comitatus.

That is so illogical, so silly, that it makes the rest of your post in this thread irrelevant.

"Unwritten traditions" are unwritten traditions. They are not law. To try to suggest that this is somehow subverting the law is sensationalistic and dishonest.


reply posted on 22-2-2007 @ 12:32 AM by shooterbrody

That was the catalyst for this bill: incompetent state management. Why wait for an incompetent governor to call in the NG when people are suffering? Why wait for a racist mayor when the city is being looted and buses are sitting idle?

It is not the FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS responsibility to account for incompetent state management. If it were there would be no local elections, only federal elections with federal appointees to take care of the local positions. You can not protect the local voting public from making bad electorial choices. The constitution sets clear laws as to states rights and federal rights. States "militias" are clearly under the direction of the highest office in the state:the governor.
en.wikipedia.org...
The law supports the checks and balances system the founding fathers put in place. IMHO it is intended to prevent the "commander in chief" from using military forces inside the U.S. except in very limited circumstances.

Posse comitatus is now null in cases of natural disaster, disease outbreak, terrorist attack, or "any other condition." This arguably destroys the original act outright, particularly in the context of a war on terror that is indefinite in nature.
wikipedia
With the questionable judgement used by the FEDERAL government in the past 8 years; I am not inclined to give anymore power to the executive branch, as it would be that branch to determine what constitutes the aforementioned conditions.

This bill attempts to prevent future dog and pony shows. When or if the state can't do the job, let's try to avoid another Kathleen Blanco/Ray Nagin fiasco. People are suffering in a disaster, and they need help now, not later.

No this bill takes power from the state and gives it to the fed. The same problem arose in the 1860's and that did not turn out well.

If you support an entitlement society than this is a bill you want to see. Me, I prefer a seperation of powers and a system of checks and balances as it was drawn up to be in the beginning.


reply posted on 22-2-2007 @ 01:37 AM by DCP
1)I would blame this bill on Political Correctness over someone wanting to take over the world. After Katrina the government took it up the... so they are making a knee jerk reaction. Most of the people in New Orleans made Darwinistic mistakes. Since it is not politically correct to blame individuals for there own stupid behavior it's always someone elses fault(big business, government, or whomever) If you see that a Category 5 hurricane is close by...ummm leave. (Some people cannot, that is when the local authorities need to help, but they didn't i.e the school buses that got flooded)
Another Darwinistic mistake...if you live in a hurricanes area you should have some supplies...some bottle water maybe. I think i bought 50 bottles of 16 oz water for $10 on sale. (cheep water is still clean water)
So how many people reading this things that if you don't leave the path of a major hurricane and you don't have supplies that you will be A-OK. Somehow all of this is the FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS fault... The feds do what they always do...dumb things down instead of telling the people to raise their standards(public schools anyone) Next time a group of Dee Dee Dee decides to do something stupid the federal government can act the best they can as fast as they can(how good and how fast is another debate)

2) Just because there is a bill out there saying that martial law is easier doesn't mean that the president will do it. I believe France in their constitution talks about some form of martial law, but i always think they surrender before this happens

3) Infoholic...your asking the impossible. To read, understand and REMEMBER every bill that comes through the House. Cannot be done, that's why they have a staff.


reply posted on 22-2-2007 @ 05:28 AM by jsobecky
Originally posted by shooterbrody


That was the catalyst for this bill: incompetent state management. Why wait for an incompetent governor to call in the NG when people are suffering? Why wait for a racist mayor when the city is being looted and buses are sitting idle?

It is not the FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS responsibility to account for incompetent state management. If it were there would be no local elections, only federal elections with federal appointees to take care of the local positions. You can not protect the local voting public from making bad electorial choices. The constitution sets clear laws as to states rights and federal rights. States "militias" are clearly under the direction of the highest office in the state:the governor.

< snip>
No this bill takes power from the state and gives it to the fed. The same problem arose in the 1860's and that did not turn out well.

If you support an entitlement society than this is a bill you want to see. Me, I prefer a seperation of powers and a system of checks and balances as it was drawn up to be in the beginning.

Perhaps you don't remember what happened with Katrina. People DIED because the governor and the mayor were incompetent.

And then, of course, the blame shifted to Bush, as an attempt to take the attention away from the blunders of the local mismanagement.

If the governor cannot handle the job, should people die because of it? No. Therefore, there is nothing wrong with taking control of the situation and bringing in the NG at the behest of the President.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 7 days ago with 83 member flags
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
  Posted 2 days ago with 74 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 8 days ago with 72 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 7 days ago with 49 member flags
Is it morally wrong to take a life? Not really, say bioethicists
  Posted 14 days ago with 37 member flags