It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The World Trade Center - A Riddle:

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 20 2007 @ 01:25 PM
link   
this is a riddle... but to answer the riddle, you have to answer this question first


the question:

what was the world trade center used for, and who took benefit from its use?

---

the riddle:

"who" would benefit from removing this innstallment?





posted on Feb, 20 2007 @ 01:31 PM
link   
asfasfasfsdfadsfasdfasfasdfasdasfdsafsdafasdfa
asfsdfasdf

Banks



posted on Feb, 20 2007 @ 01:52 PM
link   
For once somebody on this site has come up with a reasonable and rational theory. Thank you!



posted on Feb, 20 2007 @ 02:04 PM
link   
Larry Silverstein



posted on Feb, 21 2007 @ 08:36 AM
link   
World Trade Organization



posted on Feb, 21 2007 @ 08:44 AM
link   
[edit on 21-2-2007 by CautiousCrab]



posted on Feb, 21 2007 @ 09:17 AM
link   
it depends which world trade centre you are talking about really. a lot of documents and records were housed throughout all 3 buildings relating to investigations of corruption and wrong-doing etc.

perhaps you should compile a list of those who benefited from the loss of those documents as that would be an interesting read.



posted on Feb, 21 2007 @ 09:21 AM
link   
Ok... lets ask another question...

What is the best way to destroy documents?

a. a paper shredder

b. Hijack 4 planes and fly them into the buildings that has the documents in them.



posted on Feb, 21 2007 @ 09:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by CameronFox
Ok... lets ask another question...

What is the best way to destroy documents?

a. a paper shredder

b. Hijack 4 planes and fly them into the buildings that has the documents in them.


ok - lets ask this question...

when you are asked in a court case why you cannot produce documented proof against the defendants, is it better to answer

a) i shredded them

b) they were destroyed when the building collapsed


perhaps you should do a little research into how many documents relevant to BIG court cases were moved to the buildings not long before they were destroyed....



posted on Feb, 21 2007 @ 09:51 AM
link   
Hmm.... lets see....

IS is easier to


a. Lie about shredding papers

or

b. Lie about Orchestrating the largest terrorist attack in US History and covering it up!



posted on Feb, 21 2007 @ 10:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by CameronFox
Hmm.... lets see....

IS is easier to


a. Lie about shredding papers

or

b. Lie about Orchestrating the largest terrorist attack in US History and covering it up!


well, in both cases, very few people would have to have been involved in a coverup for it to be successful. i very much doubt that a whole department would be shredding papers and one or two individuals who MAY have known what was about to happen would most certainly have been spotted by colleagues shredding vast amounts of case files.

either way, if you have the backing of the big boys then it doesn't matter because any 'evidence' (or witness) can be made to disappear....


kix

posted on Feb, 21 2007 @ 11:39 AM
link   
CAMERON if the papers and criminal data is in the police station, how you enter and shred them?
That is the case of WTC, they needed a good solid way of saying OUCH too bad the building colapsed due to " insert innane reason here____" and we lost them all...so the answer is not just I shredded them....
I have often thought that 9/11 real motto was destroying wtc7 and the twin towers are just distraction...remember the way magicians work...htey focus on something while the "other' hand is doing the deeds!

Those who benefited most from 9/11 where the military and the big wall street crooks and bankers...



posted on Feb, 21 2007 @ 02:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by kix
CAMERON if the papers and criminal data is in the police station, how you enter and shred them?
That is the case of WTC, they needed a good solid way of saying OUCH too bad the building colapsed due to " insert innane reason here____" and we lost them all...so the answer is not just I shredded them....
I have often thought that 9/11 real motto was destroying wtc7 and the twin towers are just distraction...remember the way magicians work...htey focus on something while the "other' hand is doing the deeds!

Those who benefited most from 9/11 where the military and the big wall street crooks and bankers...


Ok, lets look at this again... simple questions once more...

Is it easier to

A. Pay off a few people in an office to destroy documents?

B. Blow up a building that contains documents?(You'd have to pay a few people off to gain access to critical areas) Or maybe a truck bomb would work?

or

C. Hijack 4 planes, two of them hit two buildings AFTER you wire the buildings so they can by demolished via remore control, THEN hope that as the building collapses, the debris hits ANOTHER building that has been pre -wired for demolition. Oh..and HOPE that the collapse of the FIRST two towers does enough damage to the water system so that the sprinkler system in the THIRD building does not work...OH and blame it all on the Muslims and cover it all up.

Yes... a tough choice


kix

posted on Feb, 21 2007 @ 10:56 PM
link   
there you have it...... nice explanation...now you get it Cameron...


BTW you forgot to mention 3000 dead and a country in fear 24/7



posted on Feb, 21 2007 @ 11:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by kix
there you have it...... nice explanation...now you get it Cameron...


BTW you forgot to mention 3000 dead and a country in fear 24/7


Was that a part of the question? Musta missed it.



posted on Feb, 22 2007 @ 12:29 AM
link   
But obviously we know it was more than just the loss of a few documents don't we? If that was the only reason for the whole 9-11 thing then yes I'd agree it wouldn't make sense.

But then we add... war with iraq, big money for the arms industry, Halliburton, control of oil, the free destruction of unwanted buildings for the owner, big payoffs for some through insurance and insider trading, increased federal power (pat act etc...), more population control through fear, etc...etc...etc...Please feel free to add to my short list...



posted on Feb, 22 2007 @ 12:53 AM
link   
The Airlines and their executives taking a huge hit, The hotel industry and their owners taking a huge hit, The travel & tourism industry as a whole taking a huge hit, The insurance companies and their owners taking a huge hit, Powerful stock investors taking a huge hit. I could go ON and ON.

Do you not think some of these people are every bit as powerful as some bank execs? Do you not think they wouldn't have found out about this if it were a cover-up.

A LOT more people lost on 9/11 than gained. Powerful people.



posted on Feb, 22 2007 @ 02:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by spywire


the question:

what was the world trade center used for, and who took benefit from its use?

---

the riddle:

"who" would benefit from removing this innstallment?




here's lists of the businesses/occupants at the WTC Twin Towers

citizene.com...
(for a list of WTC #2, click the link at bottom of page...)

?Who took benefit from it's use?
A: in the larger context, 'World Trade',
A: in a constricted view, the building owner(s)


*************

? Who would benefit by its removal....??

A: the myriad of regulatory and permit issuing govt depts & agencies?
A: the Port Authority, city of NY, clean up corps, the saboteur zealots

! Who would benefit with rebuilding @ WTC ?

A: Empire America, the corporate/federal elites for the next several generations



posted on Feb, 22 2007 @ 11:50 AM
link   
Can we look at the billions upon billions of dollars that were lost to many big business companies? Airlines? Hotels? etc. .etc..

And please look into the TRUTH about occupancies at WTC 7 after it was rebuilt. Lucky Larry wasnt that lucky when it came to renters at his building.



posted on Feb, 22 2007 @ 05:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by ANOK
But obviously we know it was more than just the loss of a few documents don't we?


The government has 9 trillion dollars in outstanding treasury bonds doesn't it?

Where do financial institutions ussually keep those?

No one would have been stupid enough to keep, some of thiers, in a file cabinet in an office building would they?




top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join