It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Im a Marty
If the Knights Templar were the beginning of the original masons - then there is a possibility of its genuine start - however there are other 'players' in this whole system who try infiltrate something good to make it corrupt.
This is the conspiratorial aspect of this topic - so this is why I needed to find out whether masons stemmed from the Templars or stemmed elsewhere.
Thx
Originally posted by xenu brings order
"the French founded the Templars, while the Masons are of British origin"
The French founded the Templars in 1118. The Freemasons came out of the closet in 1717. Things happened in the intervening 599 years.
Originally posted by Zhenyghi
I never heard this theory about DeMolay and the Shroud; sounds interesting. From what I recall from a university class many years ago is that scientists can also date via pollen grains, supposedly more accurate than carbon dating.
While carbon dating puts the Shroud of Turin circa the time of DeMolay, the pollen-grains found date to circa 2000 years ago, and the pollen grains are from plants found (only?) in Palestine.
Hmm...
Originally posted by Zhenyghi
Wait a minute, wasn't Jacques DeMolay burned at the stake? How could his image appear so vividly (with the beard and pierced extremities) if he was burned?...