This topic is in the Ancient & Lost Civilizations discussion forum.  (rss)


'Perperikon older than Giza Pyramids', Bulgarian team says




Topic started on 18-2-2007 @ 12:32 PM by alexg





reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-2-2007 @ 02:15 PM by Dragonlike


Thanks for sharing, alexg.
About you question, we have seen monolithic architecture pretty everywhere:
-Perperikon,
-Mycenae
-Peru
-Japan
-Stonehenge
-Egupt
-Mesoamerica
-China
-Uzbekistan
-Mesopatamia
-Australia
-Bosnia
...
Concerning the origins?
I don't know

PS: Wait, i will use my time technology and let you know soon... (Jesting the kid i am inside)



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-2-2007 @ 04:19 AM by TheWalkingFox


Did you read the Wikipedia article? It's Roman / Byzantine architecture built on top of an old Thracian settlement. It's "megalithic" in the sense that large blocks of stone were used to build it, but who built it, how, and why (it's a temple that got converted to Christianity) are not mysterious. We know less about Knossos than we do about Perperikon - and the Cretans used bigger rocks to build their palace, if that's what gets you going

No, Europeans did not "invent" megalithic structure. It developed independantly in many parts of the world. if it all had a common origin, megalithic structures would have more in common than just being structures made from big blocks o' rock.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 



























ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.072 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread