It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WolfofWar
And entire floors of people were moved around, and plaster dust was everywhere in the building, caking on furniture and windows, and the constant sounds of jack hammers and heavy equipment. From eyewitness reports, it wasn't a very stealthy operation at all. There were TONS of crew in there.
Originally posted by WolfofWar
And entire floors of people were moved around, and plaster dust was everywhere in the building, caking on furniture and windows, and the constant sounds of jack hammers and heavy equipment. From eyewitness reports, it wasn't a very stealthy operation at all. There were TONS of crew in there.
Originally posted by Vilkata
I am fairly confident that it was an inside job. however, here i must play devils advocate; if there were so many workers involved in placing explosives, then why did none of them speak out? surely this would not sit well on their concience (sp?)
Originally posted by InSpiteOf
and you can site this of course?
You dont need jack hammers to drill concrete colums, you need core drilling equipment.
I asked similar questions and only one person was able to provide me with any outside thinking. You dont need to "wire" anything, it can all be done remotely.
CD's dont need hundreds of meters of wires anymore. Besides that, you dont need conventional shaped charges either.
Originally posted by CameronFox
Does ANYONE have the Original Footage from that chopper cam? We have all found in the past: videos, quotes, and pictures doctored to fit the agenda of some. (i will assume both sides)
I will look for it myself to see if it exists. Remember, that plane was traveling at 400 MPH. All it would take would be a quick splice of a couple frames to make it dissapear.
They have voice recordings from two planes I believe that has the Highjackers speaking to the passengers. Not sure when they were "removed". Also by the cell phone calls...they all say the plane was taken over. And can I add that not one mentioned anyone jumpping out of the plane and the plane set on "auto pilot". I dont know much about planes...but i do think this would cause cabin depressurization...which was never mentioned by any passengers.
Originally posted by Rotator
You want to see it but you don't, thats a very honest statement.
I cant see it either, and the makers of the film cant see it, thats why they made the film.
Originally posted by NegativeBeef
..how did they convince the hijackers to commit suicide?
Originally posted by Vilkata
Originally posted by WolfofWar
And entire floors of people were moved around, and plaster dust was everywhere in the building, caking on furniture and windows, and the constant sounds of jack hammers and heavy equipment. From eyewitness reports, it wasn't a very stealthy operation at all. There were TONS of crew in there.
I am fairly confident that it was an inside job. however, here i must play devils advocate; if there were so many workers involved in placing explosives, then why did none of them speak out? surely this would not sit well on their concience (sp?)
September 25, 2001: As details of the passengers on the four hijacked flights emerge, some are shown to have curious connections to the defense company Raytheon, and possibly its Global Hawk pilotless aircraft program (see 1998 and August 2001).
Stanley Hall (Flight 77) was director of program management for Raytheon Electronics Warfare. One Raytheon colleague calls him "our dean of electronic warfare." [AP, 9/25/01]
Peter Gay (Flight 11) was Raytheon's Vice President of Operations for Electronic Systems and had been on special assignment to a company office in El Segundo, Calif. [AP, 9/25/01] Raytheon's El Segundo's Electronic Systems division is one of two divisions making the Global Hawk. [ISR Journal, 3/02]
Kenneth Waldie (Flight 11) was a senior quality control engineer for Raytheon's electronic systems.
David Kovalcin (Flight 11) was a senior mechanical engineer for Raytheon's electronic systems. [CNN, 9/01]
Herbert Homer (Flight 175) was a corporate executive working with the Department of Defense. [CNN, 9/01, Northeastern University Voice, 12/11/01]
Raytheon employees with possible links to Global Hawk can be connected to three of the four flights? There may be more, since many of the passengers' jobs and personal information have remained anonymous. A surprising number of passengers, especially on Flight 77, have military connections. [Chicago Tribune, 9/16/01] Could these Raytheon employees have known too much? Or is it possible they, along with others, were not even on the planes?"
Originally posted by CameronFox
Does ANYONE have the Original Footage from that chopper cam? We have all found in the past: videos, quotes, and pictures doctored to fit the agenda of some. (i will assume both sides)
I will look for it myself to see if it exists. Remember, that plane was traveling at 400 MPH. All it would take would be a quick splice of a couple frames to make it dissapear.
They have voice recordings from two planes I believe that has the Highjackers speaking to the passengers. Not sure when they were "removed". Also by the cell phone calls...they all say the plane was taken over. And can I add that not one mentioned anyone jumpping out of the plane and the plane set on "auto pilot". I dont know much about planes...but i do think this would cause cabin depressurization...which was never mentioned by any passengers.
Originally posted by Rotator
They never commited suicide by flying their plane into a tower as this live footage clearly shows. www.livevideo.com... _cid=49330
So no plane hit Tower 2 only a massive explosion from within.
Originally posted by Midwest Agenda
Ok lets see if I have this straight.
No highjackers...these airplanes were wired with remote control units. Who wired them - where were they wired - why has no one come forward and said "yup, I wireds me some planes the other day and they flies real good like - all by themselves and everything."
[edit on 7-3-2007 by Midwest Agenda]
Advocates of the theory that remote control might have been used to guide the 9/11 aircraft to their targets, have been troubled by a debate over whether the necessary remote controls were actually built-in to the aircraft, or whether they were bolted-on as a retrofit for the specific tasks of 9/11. Both theories have been viewed as having difficulties: building the system as standard equipment would require too many people to know about the system (causing security difficulties), while a retrofit of the system would also be too complex and expensive with excessive risks of discovery.
A review of Boeing documentation shows that in fact, the 757/767 flight computer has nearly all of the required capabilities as standard equipment, including guidance, communications, GPS navigation, and traffic control functions.