It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mondogiwa
3. Is there any chance that the Raptor could get 360 degree thrudt vectoring in the future?
Originally posted by WestPoint23
the F-22 was designed from day one with TVC in mind. As such it has a dedicated airframe (and FLCS) designed to be maneuverable and to take advantage of 2D TVC to the fullest. That is why it is as agile as any fighter out there with 3D TVC (probably more so with a combat load). And as I said before the exhausts were also deisgned to reduce tailpipe RCS and Infared, good luck doing that with a conventional blowpipe.
[edit on 17-2-2007 by WestPoint23]
Originally posted by WestPoint23
The reason why the F-22 does not have 3D TVC is because, to put it simply, it does not need it! Not to mention it would be in conflict with the overall LO theme of the plane. It's not because the US can't produce a 3D TVC engine (we did it a long time ago)
and no it's not going to be a must have in future 6th gen UCAV's.
The Flanker and Mig had 3D TVC added on later (Mig's initially did not even have FBW), the F-22 was designed from day one with TVC in mind.
As such it has a dedicated airframe (and FLCS) designed to be maneuverable and to take advantage of 2D TVC to the fullest. That is why it is as agile as any fighter out there with 3D TVC (probably more so with a combat load).
And as I said before the exhausts were also deisgned to reduce tailpipe RCS and Infared, good luck doing that with a conventional blowpipe.
Originally posted by Darkpr0
I didn't say they couldn't. I'm aware that it has been done, but not in the mass quantities you would need for a production aircraft.
Originally posted by Darkpr0
If we were to compare the states of both aircraft at the time that the MiG still lacked FBW the Raptors we know would not even exist, so lets not compare 21st Century Fighters to a Cold War Fighter, hmm?
Originally posted by Darkpr0
The only fair fighter to compare the Raptor to right now would be the Su-47 Berkut. While it's not in production its still on the level with the Raptor.
Originally posted by Darkpr0
Also as a better comparison, you might have to wait until the PAK-FA comes out before we can meet any true competitors for the Raptor.
Originally posted by Darkpr0
However, I'm fairly sure that if the US could easily put 360 TVC onto the Raptor, they would.
Originally posted by Darkpr0
Just like the gun pod and the 2D TVC, it just might come in handy.
Originally posted by Darkpr0
The only way to not see it is if it isn't there as much, i.e. throttling the engines back.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
...because it was deemed unnecessary for the F-22 and not beneficial enough to go through all the problems of retrofitting it onto our existing aircraft. In any case I think you will find that there are less production Flankers/Migs with 3D TVC then there are F-22's with TVC.
Well, the Mig-29 was introduced in 1983, the ATF program had already been initiated by then and the YF-22 flew in 1990. Both aircraft were designed for the Cold War, it just so happens that the F-22 will dominate well into the 21st Century.
Also, I'm glad that the Mig-29 and Su-27 cannot be compared to the F-22. Just a few years ago ignorance led (most of) us to believe the Raptor was completely outclassed by these two fighters when it came to maneuverability. Imagine that.
According to who? The Berkut was a technology demonstrator, no more comparable to any current operational A/C then the F-15 ACTIVE of F-16 XL were to the Flankers and Mig's at the time. The Berkut was a test bed, lacking weapons, vital avionics, combat testing etc... Word of mouth and a "cool" wing do not translate to "on level with the Raptor". When, if, maybe the Berkut became a production aircraft and had some published results, then we can talk; until then lets leave all unfounded statement to ourselves, k?
You just don't get it do you? We can put 3D TVC in any of our fighters, we just don't because overall we have deemed it unnecessary and impractical not to mention that we don't live by selling birds at air shows. As I said before the F-22 was designed to be maneuverable, the 2D TVC combined with it's design and FLCS achieve a level of maneuverability (even with a combat load) that we are content with. That is why 2D TVC was chosen from the beginning, the entire airframe was built around it, there is no need for 3D TVC. That is also why retrofitting a design and engine built around 2D TVC would not make sense and why it would do more harm than good.
Originally posted by Willard856
Public pictures of the F-22 cockpit at the following link
Originally posted by The_unraveller
Isn't the F-35 with the V/STOL capability? Or did they remove that? If they didn't then its better to say, that the F-35 blows the AV-8 Harrier out of the water.
I don't know if there is a Navy variant for the F-22, can anyone point me in the right direction?
Originally posted by BlueRaja
The A variant is going to be produced in higher numbers than the B and C, so how can they be the more widely used models?