It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gfad
I stand corrected John, but don't you have any comments on the other pieces of evidence in that post? How about all the photos I produced when you predicted there would be none!?
Originally posted by johnlear
GFAD could you please post that prediction? Thanks.
Originally posted by johnlear
No, its not secret from the Russians, they don't have to rely on lo-res snow covered satellite photos. No. its not secret from the Chinese, they have much better resources than I do. Its secret only from the American Public who paid for it.
Originally posted by gfad
I dont really get what you are trying to say here. Whats the point in building a base in such a remote location when the Russians and other nations can spy on it so easily?
Originally posted by IronDogg
Hi John, I mean no disrespect, and I am not refuting any of your claims whatsoever, I totally enjoy all this speculation and discussion, but I just wanted to comment a little on the 5 mile long concrete truck convoy...
Originally posted by OBE1
It's possible that the truck convoy's that John's sources have alluded to, were simply groups of leased vehicles moving en mass to the site where they would remain through critical phases of the project...recycle back for use elsewhere, then return again as needed.
Originally posted by johnlear
Originally posted by gfad
I dont really get what you are trying to say here. Whats the point in building a base in such a remote location when the Russians and other nations can spy on it so easily?
The point is that the facility may not be related to any perceived threat from the Russians or the Chinese. The perceived threat may be from the American public themselves.
Possibly Sandia is where all the preparation for 911 took place including modifications of the airplanes used therein (if any)
I had a look at Penta-Con this morning and it strengthens my belief that the aircraft seen by the 4 interviewees may have been a holograph. A previously rigged bomb inside the Pentagon was rigged to explode with the holograph appearing to hit the Pentagon. This was at 9:31. A few minutes later, at 9:38, the airplane or missile that ATC was tracking impacted the same area of the Pentagon.
Originally posted by johnlear
Possibly Sandia is where all the preparation for 911 took place including modifications of the airplanes used therein (if any)
Originally posted by gfad
And the story get even more fantastic ........
Originally posted by gfad
Classic John Lear response. When presented with valid rebuttals of evidence he produced, ignore the post and make a sarcastic comment.
Come on John, I think we can have a discussion in a more mature manner than this. Do you have anything to say about my post on the airspace and the fact that Sandia isnt even in the NTS?
Originally posted by johnlear
No. 1 Please move my circle 2 miles south.
Originally posted by gfad
These were all blasts of magnitude ~150kT. Compare that to the Hiroshima bomb which was only 13kT. This list only comprises tests in the exact location of the supposed base as well, there were even more tests in Area 20 less than a mile away!
John, how do you propose that this massive construction took place during this time of nuclear testing?
Originally posted by johnlear
I don't know I wasn't there. Also I don't know exactly where the blasts were set, only where the government says they were set.
...
In addition to the facility which probably employs a thousand people, maybe more, and is located on the ridge east of Silent Canyon or Silent Spring
...
I would guess tht maybe the nuclear blasts if they were held at all were really at a place far from Sandia so as not to disrupt the construction but were listed as being close to the construction for anybody who might be trying to figure out what that huge scar on the Pahute Mesa was.
Originally posted by johnlear
Possibly Sandia is where all the preparation for 911 took place including modifications of the airplanes used therein (if any)
I had a look at Penta-Con this morning and it strengthens my belief that the aircraft seen by the 4 interviewees may have been a holograph. A previously rigged bomb inside the Pentagon was rigged to explode with the holograph appearing to hit the Pentagon. This was at 9:31. A few minutes later, at 9:38, the airplane or missile that ATC was tracking impacted the same area of the Pentagon.
Originally posted by Ghost01
Modifications? What are you talking about?
The Plane that crash into the Pentagon was American Airlines Flight 77. For the record there were people on that aircraft, many of whom were pulled from the crash. John, Holograms don't have passangers on them.
If you are suggeting that the crash occured After the initial hit, why?
Where are you getting this stuff from?
Originally posted by johnlear
If a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon (in my opinion it did not) there would be no piece of any passenger large enough to 'pull from their seat'.
The first explosion at the Pentagon occurred at 9:31. This was probably the fake crash either a 'pull up' or holograph. The airplane that ATC was tracking crashed at 9:38 (or originally 9:43 but subsequently backed down to 9:38) to more closely coincide with the first enplosion.
Where are you getting this stuff from? Information available to anybody with a computer and the ability to research the web using their favorite search engine. Key words I would suggest using are, Pentagon Clock, 911 ATC, etc. Thanks for your input it is always apreciated.