It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gfad
And another thing .... wouldnt this massive scar show up on satellite imagery? We have a large catelogue of Groom Lake images but I bet if someone took the time to dig out all the images of that non descript mountain ridge they wouldnt see any scar or construction work.
Originally posted by Tom Bedlam
John:
Is the installation called Sandia, or does Sandia run the installation for another governmental entity?
For example, Sandia National Labs is owned by DOE, but is also called Sandia. Everyone just calls it "Sandia" too, although properly it's not the Sandia corporation nor is it owned by them.
Also Sandia IS LM, and there's a lot of Sandia/LockMar/Skunkworks back and forth.
Originally posted by hiii_98
is the land and airspace in this location secure? Could someone adventure or backpack to the area to check things out without camo dudes pointing guns? I have alot of free time and looking for some more adventures to post on ATS and willing for a challenge.
Originally posted by Ghost01
Intresting observation! Is there a way we could find out for sure?
Originally posted by johnlear
GFAD, what are you betting on here? That I am not telling the truth as to what I saw or that the image has been photoshopped? Or what? Just wanted to be clear here. Thanks.
Originally posted by johnlear
GFAD. I am wondering if you think during a Red Flag excercise all the fighters and bombers load up with bombs, rockets and other ordinance and just go looking for targets of opportunity like 3-4. If so, you are poorly informed. Every mission and every target is carfully coordinated and if there is a dry lake with a target on it and it is not supposed to be bombed then it won't be bombed. My personal opinion is that you are looking at a photo that is at least 20 years ld.
Originally posted by johnlear
This is the area of Sandia taken by a satellite camera in 1984.
This is the same area taken by a satellite camera in 2006.
As a matter of fact it seems that the satellite photo taken in 2006 has less resolution that that taken in 1984. And there seems to be some terrain changes in the 2006 photo as compared with the one taken in 1984. But there are so many little pixels in the 2006 pictures its hard to tell.
Originally posted by Ghost01
John,
Are you sure these images are correctly labled?
You are saying the 1984 image is easier to see then the 2006 image. However, for me the one lable 2006 is much clearer. Mislabeling images is easy to do, I've done it before.
Tim
Originally posted by gfad
I do agree with Tim though, the 2006 image has a higher resolution than the 1986 one. When you say its not as clear though, thats possibly because you are enlarging an area of a highly compressed photo. The original photo is a sample of a high-res satellite image.
Originally posted by johnlear
I am not sure what you are calling a high-res satellite image GFAD but my concept of high-res are the current GoogleEarth photos of Groom Lake and TTR. The snow covered 2006 photo of NTS is not high-res as Groom Lake and TTR are high-res.
Originally posted by gfad
When you follow the link you see a number to call to purchase the image, if you did that you would get a nice pretty image with as much detail as Groom or TTR on GE now.
Originally posted by johnlear
Yes, thank you GFAD. What I meant was I can zoom in on Groom Lake and TTR without purchasing anything. I was just trying to make the point that there is obviously something that is being hidden in the area I allege Sandia to exist.
Originally posted by johnlear
Sandia is now almost 20 years old. There are thousands of people that work there and there are at least 3 major runways. The fact that we can't see even a dirt road into the area would lead me to believe that any photos without snow are from many years ago.
Originally posted by johnlear
Here is a photo of a Los Angeles Sectional Chart used in aviation. At the center of the chart is R-4807B which is the area directly above Sandia and which was placed on the sectional chart about the time Sandia became operational. A check with Special Use Airspace says that the area above Sandia is restricted in altitude to "Unlimited" which means ground level to outer space, and the 'Time of Use" is 'Continuous'. Seems a little drastic for some rocks and boulders don't you think? Please disregard the runway marks and road marks, they are mine and not meant to represent anything but possible locations of runways and roads.
Originally posted by gfad
Finally you say that its a bit drastic, but I believe the entire NTS is designated the same and most of that is simply rocks and boulders.
Originally posted by johnlear
Wrong again GFAD. Most of the test site is R-4807A and the time of use is 0600 Monday to 1900 Friday. After Friday and 5pm and before Monday at 0600 you can fly over wherever you want (with the exception of TTR, Groom Lake and Sandia) (R-4807B)
Originally posted by johnlear
Most of the test site is R-4807A and the time of use is 0600 Monday to 1900 Friday.
Originally posted by ben94gt
I seriously don't know where you get this info, bob lazar?
theres nothing there
Originally posted by Ghost01
John,
What would the A be for? I was taught the the "N" in 4808 N stood for North! There is no direction that begins with A. Tim