I dont know how you did because you still did not address the claims made by some that paleo-hebrew was not discovered until around 100 years ago
It isn't Palaeo Hebrew
its phoenecian
didn't you understand the image you posted yourself ?
Phoenecian was known about a long time before the 1880s
let me list the points again
1. Mormons knew Phoenecian and used it as a holy script
2. It is the mormon ten commandments that is written on the stone and no other
3. Mormons were known to be in the area since the 1840s
most importantly you would think that the Mormons would hold this up as proof that their faith is the correct one if they had nothing to do with it
their silence is very telling. Bit like the catholics reaction to the shroud of Turin eh
los lunas first and then genuine Phoenecian underneath
they are exactly the same script with minor variances that only a native speaker would notice at all. Palaeo Hebrew is just another way of saying Old Hebrew or archaic hebrew. the difference of glyph shapes between Phoenician and palaeo-Hebrew is vastly less than that between Phoenician and Latin.
The Los Lunas Decalogue not only as Byrd already pointed out is not dark enough to be more than 200 years old but the hand it is drawn in is that of a student and not a native speaker
fyi an open mind is a good thing as long as its not so open that your brain slips out and ends up a soggy mess on the floor
Win 52
i think its safe to say that the link you provided is a load of rubbish
not only because the Hopi have no such belief
but because on another page at the very same website they are claiming thats a cherokee prophecy
Hopi - www.crystalinks.com...
Cherokee - www.crystalinks.com... (halfway down the page)
[edit on 15-2-2007 by Marduk]
[edit on 15-2-2007 by Marduk]




If not, then Mormons have some involvment 