It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GwionX
Yes that IS a steep bank..But the guys accused of piloting these planes weren't exactly experienced airline pilots either.
Ok, I kinda suck at screen captures, and it seems that the stills lose a bit of (already bad) resolution, but check these stills out ..then rewatch the video on FULL SCREEN ( Btw: I am using a 19" LCD Monitor and can that it is a plane pretty clearly)
Still #1: The Tip of the Wing
Still #2: Wing and Tail (Banking plane)
Still #3 The Decent
Still #4 The tail is disappearing from view (worst still, more defined in the video)
I Hope this helps the researchers.
[edit on 17-2-2007 by GwionX]
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by GwionX
Yes that IS a steep bank..But the guys accused of piloting these planes weren't exactly experienced airline pilots either.
Ok, I kinda suck at screen captures, and it seems that the stills lose a bit of (already bad) resolution, but check these stills out ..then rewatch the video on FULL SCREEN ( Btw: I am using a 19" LCD Monitor and can that it is a plane pretty clearly)
Still #1: The Tip of the Wing
Still #2: Wing and Tail (Banking plane)
Still #3 The Decent
Still #4 The tail is disappearing from view (worst still, more defined in the video)
I Hope this helps the researchers.
[edit on 17-2-2007 by GwionX]
The only problem is that if the plane was in that step of a bank the other wing would have been really digging into the ground and probly sheared off. But thier are no signs of a wing digging into the ground in front of the Pentagon or no sign of wing debris.
Originally posted by GwionX
Just so you can believe me , as if the video isn't enough....
I went and found an image of a 757 in a hard bank..NOW let me preface this by saying..the angle of the photo does not match up exactly with the angle of the Doubletree camera view..However, you can see by this illiustration that the image in the video fits the characteristics of a Boeing 757 -- that means, the distance from the wing to the tail-fin, the size of the wing-tip in coorelation to the tail-fin..and the size it would look if viewed from 800 yards away, roughly.. heck even the color shades on the plane match up. (in grayscale because the camera is black and white)
This picture is of a Brittish Airways Jet.. I used this picture because of the banking angle...I know what hit the pentagon was a US Airways flight.
Ok here ya go:
The original picture of the British air "Banking" plane --
The video still-shot without the plane--
The video still shot with the British Air 757 on scaled to the proper size. the nose is down a bit..but like i said the camera angles are not exact from both the video and the british air photo, but the characteristics are dead on.
US Air Color scheme -- silver wings -- darker tail-fin--
Link to the Video ..Watch it ..you will see.
www.youtube.com...
I hope this helps the researchers.
[edit on 18-2-2007 by GwionX]
Originally posted by GwionX
Yeah, I have a comment...You desparately desire for this to be untrue..for whatever reason..*Shrugs*
Originally posted by nyarlathotep
Originally posted by GwionX
Yeah, I have a comment...You desparately desire for this to be untrue..for whatever reason..*Shrugs*
I don't think that people desperately want it to be untrue, it's just that the facts don't add up.
Can you comment specifically why the 911 commission report has flight 77 flying on the south side of the Navy Annex and the NTSB report, which supposedly got it's info from the black boxes, shows flight 77 flying on the north side of the Annex?
Originally posted by GwionX
Yeah, I have a comment...You desparately desire for this to be untrue..for whatever reason..*Shrugs*
SO.. what you want to do is measure the very tippy-tip smallest measurement possible..so you don't have to be OBJECTIVE.
When in actuallity you should be thinking about the whole --Surface Area-- that comes into view and how much is even harder to see due to the grainy quality of the video.
Hell just look at the video...you can see it is a plane crashing into the Penatagon...100% of the people I have shown this to ..on my computer both at home and at work...A couple of them didn't believe the government story either...until they saw that Video.
Now you have to ask the question..if the Accounts regarding the Pentagon in "Conspiracy Classics" such as Loose Change, and In Plane Site are proven to be completely inaccurate...then just how many OTHER things were misrepresented in those flicks?
Originally posted by nick7261
Originally posted by GwionX
Yeah, I have a comment...You desparately desire for this to be untrue..for whatever reason..*Shrugs*
This has nothing to do with wanting anything. It's a matter of mathematics. The wing tip in the video is far too big for that distance.
I think you're self-projecting re the comments about desparately wanting something to be true.
SO.. what you want to do is measure the very tippy-tip smallest measurement possible..so you don't have to be OBJECTIVE.
Measuring the size of the "wing" in the video and calculating it's width based on the dimensions of the site IS objective.
Looking at a grainy white shape and deciding that you KNOW it's a wing is subjective, and wishful thinking.
When in actuallity you should be thinking about the whole --Surface Area-- that comes into view and how much is even harder to see due to the grainy quality of the video.
What does the surface area have to do with anything?
The frames that you posted show what you claim to be the wing tip of a 757. You're the one claiming it's a wing of a 757, and I pointed out that based on the distance the "plane" is from the camera, and the size of an actual wing, the image in the photo is disproportionately too large -by far.
And rather than verify this using basic math and a diagram of the site, you instead choose to attack my psychological motives or whatever the heck the comment about me desparately wanting to believe something to true was supposed to be about.
Originally posted by GwionX
Look, Wierd #e happens! I know I *used* to be a cop, my now ex-wife was an EMT...Ask anyone that deals with disaster and they will tell you straight up..Some stuff just doesn't add up. I could go into detail ..but I will save that for some other time. Just gory cop stories.
Originally posted by GwionX
Look, Wierd #e happens! I know I *used* to be a cop, my now ex-wife was an EMT...Ask anyone that deals with disaster and they will tell you straight up..Some stuff just doesn't add up. I could go into detail ..but I will save that for some other time. Just gory cop stories.
Originally posted by sp00n1
After re-analyzing the video under CRYSTALI CRYSTAL BS VIEW, the same used by debunkers trying desperately to back up the OFFICIAL CONSPIRACY THEORY, i have come to some startling conclusions that MUST be seen!!!
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by GwionX
Look, Wierd #e happens! I know I *used* to be a cop, my now ex-wife was an EMT...Ask anyone that deals with disaster and they will tell you straight up..Some stuff just doesn't add up. I could go into detail ..but I will save that for some other time. Just gory cop stories.
I was a Crew Chief in the Air Force so i have abackground in aviaiton, i am also a former federal police officer and have had training in emergency incident management. If you were a cop you should be able to do alot better research, also you should know that the crime scenes were not handled properly at any of the crash sites.
The FBI did not take over the crash site at the Pentagon and make it a crime scene for 10 days, and then after stating it would take a month the do the crime scene they handed it back over to the military in 5 days.
Maybe you can explain why after over 5 years we still do not have a FBI or NTSB incident report on any of the 911 crash scenes.
Originally posted by GwionX
No, it follows what almost everyone in this country has been saying.
It fits into Caustic's research ..it fits into the Official Story.
If you watch the video closely and focus on the diagrams I have posted, you will see it. This is supported
...Unless there was another 757 that crashed into the pentagon that day..hmmm.. or this is all just yet ANOTHER government plot developing before your eyes.. Get Real.
If I get the time..I will make you a cool little video, or sumpin, complete with a thumpin beat that you can groove to... And talk like I am Kevin Costner in JFK, I will post deep thought provoking questions in bright white letters on a black background....and in THIS "Quick Doc' I will tell only the truth.... it will be the first video of its kind.
Anyhoo... I don't really care if you believe me or not... I am just trying to contribute to the forums.