It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Excellent documentary about military saucers

page: 1

log in


posted on Feb, 14 2007 @ 02:22 PM

Watch this movie at 41:50. It shows that a coil of no. 3 wire can "levitate" when plugged into the wall socket. That is crazy! I've never seen anything like that before. Not even the scientist working with it can explain why it does that.

posted on Feb, 15 2007 @ 01:03 AM

here's a link to info about the avro: very interesting government craft in the 1950's.

nice link man!

[edit on 2/15/2007 by lagos]

posted on Feb, 15 2007 @ 11:02 AM
250 turns of #30 wire eh?.... sounds alot easier than the lifter I built 2 years ago!!! Looks ALOT like what is done in lifter experiments, but quite a different configuration as there is no corona wire and it doesn't seem to rely on large static charge at high V like the Biefield-Brown effect lifters. The fact that he ran it off of 120V AC 60Hz is pretty sweet too... except it was getting pretty hot. Another thing is this config looks to have a much greater lifting efficiency than a typical lifter construct. Lifters need to be exceedingly lite... The coil in the vid looks to be much more massive and I was surprised how forcefully it lifted. I'd love to try this at different voltages and frequencies as is suggested in the vid.

I WILL be trying this at some point!!!

posted on Feb, 15 2007 @ 12:32 PM
Watched the whole thing, very interesting. Maybe it is all just government. If they are really 50 years advanced then it is honestly incomprehensible, to a regular person, what kind of technology they may have.

posted on Feb, 15 2007 @ 05:05 PM
I liked this documentary; it was an excellent show on the history of military saucers, although if you are at all familiar with UFO history and data, you will find that it draws an obviously incorrect conclusion. The writer/producer Justine Kershaw seems to have arrived at her conclusion first: UFOs are actually government produced war-machines kept under wraps by “psych-ops” specialists in the military. She interviews engineers and developers to illustrate her point. If the facts she turned up did not support her argument, she would not include them. What the viewers do not know she will not tell them.

Here are some of the facts that the author seems to have overlooked (not presented) that do not support the ‘Government Made All UFOs” case:
• The characteristics of the craft and their occupants do not support control by on-board humans (e.g., large changes in inertia, craft too small for humans, they contain light-based ‘weapons’ or beams, various instances of ‘high strangeness’, noiseless flight, sightings of aliens, etc.)
• The witnessed craft do not seem to be increasing in technological complexity.
• Analysis of the most well-publicized and well-documented sightings shows behaviors inconsistent with any sort of logical military testing. For example, it would be absurd that the military would be conducting aerial test flights near O’Hare airport or a Nuclear Missile silo (without letting the CO know). It would also be absurd for the military to mutilate cows in farmer’s fields when they could raise their own.
• When project “Sign” was completed (by the US Air Force), the conclusion of the report was that UFOs were real. They renamed it project “Grudge” then project “Bluebook” to try to prove the opposite.

In the same respect, here are some of the not-so-clever devices included in the documentary that are used to indirectly discredit the UFOs as Alien Spacecraft group:
• The use of terms like “Amateur UFO Spotters”, while showing low-budget footage of panic-stricken people and cheap UFO videos.
• Play silly, campy UFO songs from the 50’s to make it seem even more ridiculous.
• Imply that “pulp writer” Marine Corps officer was the first to announce that UFOs were from outer space.

Given ALL the data, it seems much more logical that SOME UFOs are in fact extraterrestrial space craft, and governments have been scrambling to reverse-engineer them with various degrees of success. I will admit that I might be wrong, but so far nothing has dissuaded me from this conclusion.

top topics

log in