It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

How NATO will win the mid-east

page: 2
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 14 2007 @ 04:26 PM
link   
Dude, here is what is really going to happen....... The U.S. and or Israel will attack Iran. Russia gets pissed (their nuke facilities are not going to be paid for because they are a smoldering hole). China gets pissed(ther LNG that they already paid for is not going to be shipped). China and Russia are both pissed at Israel, and they both nuke Israel and or Iraq. More likely and than or.

I actually voted for W........... I was very confused in those days.....

You have to understand that W doesn't want to convert the middle east to democracy, he wants to smash it to pieces(divide countries into more smaller countries) so that it is easier for Israel to dominate. Unfortunately the rest of the world is getting to the point that they won't accept the zionist domination of the middle east. So welcome to WWIII. We are standing on the edge of a cliff about to jump, bombing Iran is jumping.




posted on Feb, 14 2007 @ 04:39 PM
link   
I still dont think it will come down too nukes.

If ever there was a time when US leaders were going to nuke someone (outside of japan) it was the cold war era. IMO the US could smash iran with conventional weapons.

THe only thing stopping US leaders from nuking another country is the POLITICAL fallout of such an action. And as far as i know, the US public is not looking to watch another country be vapourized by their own.



posted on Feb, 14 2007 @ 09:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by InSpiteOf


If ever there was a time when US leaders were going to nuke someone (outside of japan) it was the cold war era. IMO the US could smash iran with conventional weapons.



You smash it, you own it. We dont need to have another occupation we cant handle.



posted on Feb, 15 2007 @ 12:14 AM
link   


If ever there was a time when US leaders were going to nuke someone (outside of japan) it was the cold war era. IMO the US could smash iran with conventional weapons.

Yeah conventionnals weapons. Nuclear bunker-buster/mini-nukes ARE conventionnals weapons by the new military standarts. That's why they can use them and say that they only used conventionnal weapons, we'll only know after that they used nukes.



posted on Feb, 15 2007 @ 11:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by Vitchilo


If ever there was a time when US leaders were going to nuke someone (outside of japan) it was the cold war era. IMO the US could smash iran with conventional weapons.

Yeah conventionnals weapons. Nuclear bunker-buster/mini-nukes ARE conventionnals weapons by the new military standarts. That's why they can use them and say that they only used conventionnal weapons, we'll only know after that they used nukes.


granted but there still nukes. When people see the exent of the damage to the civilian sector, IMO, it would galvanize there opinion to come out against the war and bombing.

Nukes are a curse that need to be obliterated from the planet earth.



new topics

top topics
 
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join