It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by timeless test
Oh whoops, apparently we would need 10.2 planets if everyone was like me.
Would the rest of you mind sqeezing up a bit please. Ta.
Originally posted by a1ex
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE ME, WE WOULD NEED 4.2 PLANETS.
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.0 PLANETS.
Yeah, seven people in a 500 square foot home without electricity, eating only grass and never even dreaming about riding in a car. I'm sure everyone in the world is going to live like that...
Originally posted by thematrix
2.something score for me with 5.6 as the national score, 3 planets needed.
The scoring is stupid in some ways, most of my score is because I eat meat 1ce a day.
According to that test you'd have to be a vegetarian to be any good, which is utter and complete bullocks.
[edit on 13/2/07 by thematrix]
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 23
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 5.2 PLANETS.
CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 3.6
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 5.3 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2 PLANETS.