It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"A typical PEAR experiment had a person sitting in front of an electric box which flashed numbers just above or below 100.
The participant would be told to "think high" or "think low" as they watched the display.
Researchers concluded that people could alter the results in such machines about two or three times out of 10,000.
PEAR says such effects could be "functionally devastating" for people working in aircraft cockpits, surgical facilities and even ICBM missile silos."
"It's been an embarrassment to science, and I think an embarrassment for Princeton," Robert Park, a University of Maryland physicist, told the NYT.
"Science has a substantial amount of credibility, but this is the kind of thing that squanders it."
Originally posted by TheBandit795
I wonder if that Robert Park ever took the time to look at the data and the methods they used for the experiment.
Originally posted by GNOarmy
Shouldn't someone been able to predict its closure. I mean it was an ESP lab and all. Just a little fun. Couldn't resist the joke.
Originally posted by GNOarmy
Shouldn't someone been able to predict its closure. I mean it was an ESP lab and all. Just a little fun. Couldn't resist the joke.