posted on Feb, 13 2007 @ 09:47 AM
To be honest, I don't believe NK either. (And I suppose the negotiators know the problems, too!)
But, what does NK need?
What is the point of losing there atomic strength, for 'a bit of oil'?
Don't they have the strength they declared to have?
Will they only give up a part of their nuclear project?
What (even) we know, is that most of NK Military strength is underground, meaning most of the west-countries don't exactly know how strong the NK
army really is.
Maybe they only worked on the atomic Weapons to be able to blackmail the West.
And this is probably the worse case:
They have only given up working on the technologie because someone (a country) has promised to supply them with nuclear weapons when they 'need'
E.g. NK gives up their plans and have the embargos lifted, can then work on building up the rest of their army and when the time comes they can have
(their?) nukes back...
Whatever, I'm glad they have started negotiating, but I don't trust them...