It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There were 39 combat related killings in Iraq in January.
In the fair city of Detroit there were 35 murders in the month of January. That's just one American city, about as deadly as the entire war-torn country of Iraq
It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno to take the Branch Davidian compound.
That was a 51-day operation..
I mean, economy is up, unemployment is at an all time low and there are lots of jobs bieng created. It is just that the media spouts negative information and shows nothing good, because good deeds do not sell, death does.
www.epinet.org...
Long-term unemployment—when unemployed workers have been seeking work for six months or more—is the most severe form of joblessness. The consequences of extended periods of joblessness are significant: the long-term unemployed often face financial, personal, and health care hardships as well as the loss of their unemployment insurance benefits. An analysis of long-term unemployment from 2000 to 2003 (a period spanning the recession that occurred between March and November 2001) shows that the number of people without work for six months or more has risen at the extraordinarily high rate of 198.2% over this period.1 Job seekers with college degrees and those age 45 and older have had an especially difficult time finding work, with long-term unemployment for those groups rising by 299.4% and 217.6%, respectively.
Are we losing? Are we winning?
Originally posted by esdad71
Are we losing? Are we winning? Can anyone provide me with some good insight as to how the WOT is progressing,
Originally posted by esdad71
Things that make you think a little:
There were 39 combat related killings in Iraq in January.
In the fair city of Detroit there were 35 murders in the month of January. That's just one American city, about as deadly as the entire war-torn country of Iraq
When some claim that President Bush shouldn't have started this war, state the following:
A. FDR led us into World War II.
B. Germany never attacked us ; Japan did.
From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost ...an average of 112,500 per yea
C. Truman finished that war and started one in Korea . North Korea never attacked us ..
From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost ...an average of 18,334 per year.
D John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us.
E. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost ..
an average of 5,800 per year.
F. Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent.
Bosnia never attacked us . He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing.
Are we losing? Are we winning? Can anyone provide me with some good insight as to how the WOT is progressing, and I am not looking for the same rhetoric please, be creative. What is to be done before the war comes home.
[edit on 12-2-2007 by esdad71]
You have voted esdad71 for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have two more votes this month.
Originally posted by esdad71
H. In the years since terrorists attacked us , President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Libya, Iran, and, North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people.
Originally posted by esdad71
Are we losing? Are we winning? Can anyone provide me with some good insight as to how the WOT is progressing, and I am not looking for the same rhetoric please, be creative. What is to be done before the war comes home.
Originally posted by esdad71
Are we losing? Are we winning? Can anyone provide me with some good insight as to how the WOT is progressing, and I am not looking for the same rhetoric please, be creative. What is to be done before the war comes home.
[edit on 12-2-2007 by esdad71]
Originally posted by esdad71
C'mon, I wanted a discussion on this. I guess since there are no UFO's or Nazis and it doesn;t paint Bush in bad light everyone is scared off
Originally posted by esdad71
Thanks guys, that is what I expected. Sarcastic tone detected
Originally posted by esdad71
There is no need to attack the messenger
Originally posted by esdad71
Did you not get far enough to see that there was a question, or did you see it was supporting Bush and tuned it out?
Unemployment is down, and it is Wal-Mart and corporations that pay nothing as wage that are bankrupting the workforce, not the administration. This has been growing since the INternet boom in the 80's. THere is no middle class. None. You are either rich or use payday loans to get by. This is life.
www.cbpp.org...
An estimated 390,000 unemployed workers will exhaust their regular benefits in January.
Originally posted by esdad71
I wanted some points, and there are good ones. Now, if you took the time to make some points rather than trying to discredit my repsonses, you are right, this could be a good thread.
My question was how long before the war is on our homefront? Do we beleive that we will have areas like Gaza or DMZ's in Detroit? If we invade Iran, there will be hell to pay stateside.
Originally posted by esdad71
Are we losing? Are we winning? Can anyone provide me with some good insight as to how the WOT is progressing, and I am not looking for the same rhetoric please, be creative. What is to be done before the war comes home.
Originally posted by esdad71
My question was how long before the war is on our homefront? Do we beleive that we will have areas like Gaza or DMZ's in Detroit?
Jimmy 1880
This is where the OP starts to loose credibility,