It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I agree with Howard's analysis of the situation; however, I question the wisdom of a foreign leader so publicly attacking a specific candidate in a U.S. election -- and a primary one at that.
I agree with Howard's analysis of the situation; however, I question the wisdom of a foreign leader so publicly attacking a specific candidate in a U.S. election -- and a primary one at that.
Originally posted by xpert11
Barack made the right response. Howard should keep his nose out of domestic American politics he wouldn't like it if Barack openly supported Rudd for PM.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
I don't think Americans like being told how to vote by foreigners -- even from closely allied nations such as Australia.
Originally posted by KhieuSamphan
Is this story getting much coverage in the US?
Originally posted by djohnsto77
I agree with Howard's analysis of the situation; however, I question the wisdom of a foreign leader so publicly attacking a specific candidate in a U.S. election -- and a primary one at that.
Originally posted by MooneyBravo
djohnsto77
People need to speak out against liberal lunatics like obama and the rest of communist party. Howard is doing exactly what needs to be done.
The “Zawahiri letter,” which was dated July 9, 2005, said a rapid American military withdrawal could have caused the foreign jihadists, who had flocked to Iraq to battle the Americans, to simply give up the fight and go home.
“The mujahaddin must not have their mission end with the expulsion of the Americans from Iraq, and then lay down their weapons, and silence the fighting zeal,” said the “Zawahiri letter,” according to a text released by the office of the U.S. Director of National Intelligence.
For instance, more credence would be given to an intercepted Dec. 11, 2005, communiqué from a senior bin Laden lieutenant known as “Atiyah” to the then-chief of al-Qaeda in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a document discovered by the U.S. military at the time of Zarqawi’s death in June 2006.
In the letter about al-Qaeda’s strategy in Iraq, Atiyah told Zarqawi that “prolonging the war is in our interest.” A chief reason, Atiyah explained, was that Zarqawi’s brutal tactics had alienated many Iraqi Sunni insurgents and thus a continued U.S. military presence was needed to buy time for al-Qaeda to mend fences and put down roots.
The “Atiyah letter” – like a previously intercepted message attributed to al-Qaeda’s second-in-command Ayman Zawahiri – indicated that a U.S. military pullout could be disastrous for al-Qaeda’s terrorist bands, which are estimated at only about 5 to 10 percent of the anti-U.S. fighters in Iraq.
Without the U.S. military presence to serve as a rallying cry and a unifying force, the al-Qaeda contingent faced disintegration from desertions and attacks from Iraqi insurgents who resented the wanton bloodshed committed by Zarqawi’s non-Iraqi terrorists.
Originally posted by Low Orbit
Prime Minister John Howard is a Patriot and a leader in the war on terror, for a junior senator/presidential candidate to come back and make demands of the prime minister shows the inexperience and carelessness of Obama.
If the US was only so lucky to have a man like John Howard be an actual American. However all Americans should take note when he talks to them, after all we listen up if Yosama Bin Ladin or Iran's pocket sized Ahmadinininininedjihad has a message for us , why shouldn't we listen the the PM of one of the US' closest allies, Australia.
I much rather vote for John Howard for President than Obama, so Obama better watch that million dollar mouth of his or he might be out of the running early.
[edit on 12-2-2007 by Low Orbit]
Melbourne, like Ive asked hundreds of people before you, if you don't like the strategy how would you pull out a win over there, and the answer is you don't, YOU lose the war. Terrorism and nuclear exploitation are risks the US and Australia are unwilling to take from Iran.
Originally posted by Low Orbit
...state sponsors of terrorism that need to be confronted, next up Iran or Syria, ...
Howard and Bush are Political Leaders who are responsible for making life and death decisions on a daily basis, I am certain neither takes their job lightly.