It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Togetic
If the United States presents evidence, triple-checked, that Iran is supporting those undermining Iraq--perhaps directly, then isn't it to be given an objective look? If not, then what evidence needs to come out in order to say "The US is right on this one"?
Originally posted by jsobecky
There are several problems here.
One is the fact that no matter how much the info is verified, there are some who will refuse to believe it. They would have no problem taking the word of Ahmadinejad, however, as gospel truth.
Next is the fact that there are groups such as the New York Times, that actively work to undermine the US efforts in Iraq. They consistently reveal any intelligence efforts that are underway.
Seymour Hersh and William Arkin are two such people.
And then there is the reality that sources cannot always be revealed because it would compromise their efforts and identity.
Iran supplying Explosively Formed Penetrators to Iraq
The question then begs: what source would you trust? The point here is that if there is a real threat looming, then how will things be if we just sit here and say "We can't trust you" and then something awful happens? There are so many people here who are saying that they wouldn't trust anything the US government has to say. Then who is to be trusted? And if something bad come out about Iran or something good about the US, does that automatically mean its false? And if something good about Iran comes out or something bad about the US comes out from a foreign news service, does that make it true?
Originally posted by ImplementOfWar
I doubt we have much proof of anything. At least not implicating Iran's top tier government (even though we say we have proof). I dont trust my country's intelligence agencies. I have seen alot of PSYOPS directed at my own country's citizens concerning Iraq. Why would I trust their 'word' on Iran?
Originally posted by Sunsetspawn
What do east coast liberals and muslims have in common?
hmmmmmmmmmmmm...
I'm waiting...
time's up
They both hate American values.
Now where's my Vicodin?
Originally posted by Togetic
The question then begs: what source would you trust? The point here is that if there is a real threat looming, then how will things be if we just sit here and say "We can't trust you" and then something awful happens?
Originally posted by ImplementOfWar
I doubt we have much proof of anything. At least not implicating Iran's top tier government (even though we say we have proof). I dont trust my country's intelligence agencies. I have seen alot of PSYOPS directed at my own country's citizens concerning Iraq. Why would I trust their 'word' on Iran?
The officials focused on EFPs, or explosively formed penetrators, as evidence that Iran is involved in arming Iraqi insurgents. EFPs can punch through heavily armored vehicles.
The U.S. military officials said EFPs are manufactured in such a specific way that they can be traced to Iran.
Also, the U.S. military says 81 mm mortar shells used in deadly attacks in Iraq can also be directly traced to Iran.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Why deliberate 'how' much proof to release
the Idea is to relase SOO much proof, that there's NO DOUBT in anyones mind as the legitimacy of the claims.
Regardless, Iran has already been targeted, mapped and planned.
Once again, they are simply going through the motions
'' release evidence '' - ignore public
'' state goals '' - ignore obvious disaster approaching
'' state threat '' - ignore requests for proof
'' issue ultimatium '' - regardless of ability
'' strike '' - committ another warcrime.
The officials focused on EFPs, or explosively formed penetrators, as evidence that Iran is involved in arming Iraqi insurgents. EFPs can punch through heavily armored vehicles.
The U.S. military officials said EFPs are manufactured in such a specific way that they can be traced to Iran.
Also, the U.S. military says 81 mm mortar shells used in deadly attacks in Iraq can also be directly traced to Iran.
Pretty thin if you ask me.
So, the WAY these things were manufcatued points out Iran?
81mm mortar shells
why cant these be left overs from Iran/iraq war?
They arrested, and raided IRANIAN offices for christ sake.
They are monitoriing the BORDER
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Why deliberate 'how' much proof to release
the Idea is to relase SOO much proof, that there's NO DOUBT in anyones mind as the legitimacy of the claims.
[edit on 11-2-2007 by Agit8dChop]
Try going to Iran, and demanding "proof" from Khameini. See what you get.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Iran, prove us you don't work on nuclear weapons... well, we don't work on nuclear weapons... ATTACK!!!
What about the US government PROVE that Iran is making nukes? And don't complain that Iran is helping Iraqis to kill americans soldiers in Iraq, you're the invader, you deserve it, if you don't want to be killed, get out of Iraq like it was planned before the election. And Iraqis welcome this help, they want to be allied to Iran.