posted on Feb, 10 2007 @ 04:38 PM
Hey NYdgan, nice to see you tailing everyone again, just trying to disprove everyone's legitimate concerns with something that you obviously haven't
looked at enough.
I do believe shooterbrody pointed out the "Military Police" of the alleged North American Union with this:
Referencing your link: www.northcom.mil...
- You can see there is not a single mention of the USARNORTH on their
H.R. 5122 authorizes the President to employ the United States Armed Forces (in a nutshell) for whatever incident he may determine fit. At the same
time, the USARNORTH was being formed by the US Military. Those two issues, unconstitutional as they may be, are in fact just a couple steps in the
formation of the North American Union... of which obviously are going to be made by force, since the general populous won't agree to it
Compare the two sites. They are completely different "entities" under command by totally different Generals.
Simply because the USARNORTH uses the "North America" continent, and your correlation of "it could be placed anywhere so it means nothing"...
that's ridiculous. Along with all other Bills and Resolutions, the formation and allowance of this "Army" has nothing to do with anything other
than the North American "Community" (as the Council on Foreign Relations depicts is to be), and don't take my word for it, look at their "mission
USARNORTH conducts Homeland Defense (HLD) and Civil Support (CS) operations, and Theater Security Cooperation (TSC) activities, as the Army Service
Component Command (ASCC) to U.S. Northern Command in order to protect the American people and their way of life. On order, USARNORTH commands and
controls deployed forces as a Joint Task Force (JTF) or Joint Force Land Component Command (JFLCC).
I await your response with great anticipation.
[edit on 2/10/2007 by Infoholic]