It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Bush administration is expected to make public this weekend some of what intelligence agencies regard as an increasing body of evidence pointing to an Iranian link, including information gleaned from Iranians and Iraqis captured in recent American raids on an Iranian office in Erbil and another site in Baghdad.
In interviews, civilian and military officials,
The assessment was described in interviews over the past several weeks with American officials,
According to American intelligence
Some American intelligence experts believe
So no evidence, just some "officials said".
So deliberated and very well planned, Bush links and evidence of Iranian attacks of US forces in Iraq is shaping up really good. . .
Just like the WMDs in Iraq and the take out of Saddam. . .
Yes, Iran has to be served in the silver platter as the culmination of the dream for the private interest and profiteers of war that has invested so much of our tax payer money in this middle east take over. . .
Yes . . . by June Iran will be gone in smokes . . . and . . .Iraq and Iran will share no borders anymore against US invasion of the area.
Bush has gone mad But we all know that by now.
It was not so long ago that British and US commanders on the ground were denying that there was any evidence pointing to arms smuggling from Iran or Iranian involvement.
All of a sudden there is clear evidence, yet to be presented, of Iranian involvment.
Another case of making the intel fit policy, as was done in the run up to the invasion of Iraq?
Again, speculation being used in place of facts.
"Building a Case for War" with Iran: Jafarzadeh and the Downing Street Dossier Redux
LOL the Iranians are smart enough to make these bombs but dumb enough to stamp serial numbers on them.
"Building a Case for War" with Iran: Jafarzadeh and the Downing Street Dossier Redux
Originally posted by Togetic
Is there objective evidence for any of these claims? It looks like speculation and political opinion; is that what we should dictate policy on?
In 1982 with Iranian success on the battlefield, the U.S. made its backing of Iraq more pronounced, supplying it with intelligence, economic aid, normalizing relations with the government (broken during the 1967 Six-Day War), and also supplying weapons. President Ronald Reagan decided that the United States "could not afford to allow Iraq to lose the war to Iran", and that the United States "would do whatever was necessary and legal to prevent Iraq from losing the war with Iran." President Reagan formalized this policy by issuing a National Security Decision Directive ("NSDD") to this effect in June, 1982.
Source.
Originally posted by Togetic
What about the construction similarities and the serial numbers?