posted on Feb, 8 2007 @ 08:54 PM
Hey all, well I have been doing a lot of reading lately and I have come to the conclusion that environmentalism is, in a sense, the new socialism that
is on the rise.
As most educated people know, socialism does not work. It is responsible for the tremendous size and the ineptness of the U.S. government, it was
government control of the money supply that led to the Great Depression, and every major mass-murderer of the 20th century came from socialism: Lenin,
Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Mao Zedong, Kim Il Jong, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Mihn, Fidel Castro, Saddam Hussein, etc...the only places where Marxism is still
considered are in third world countries, Western universities, and certain people in American government.
Unfortunately for them, despite that they refuse to accept that socialism just doesn't work, the vast number of people the world over acknowledge
that is doesn't, so, in order for them to gain power and to enact socialist policies, and hopefully to lead to their "One World Government," as
they want, they must figure out a way to bring socialism back.
How? Well, the only way to do something like this would be to make the public think it is necessary to hand the government the power to enact
socialist policies. How does one do this? Through fear.
Enter environmentalism. Environmentalism is a religion for many; it is simply the religion for the "non-religious" people; most people who are
environmentalists are not religious in the traditional sense. Thus, without realizing it, environmentalism rises up to take conventional religion's
Environmentalism in a sense really is a traditional religion; it is almost an exact copy of Christianity. You have the time of peace and harmony, akin
to Adam and Eve, when humans lived in harmony with nature, running aorund naked and eating fruits (this is a fantasy), there is the eating of the
fruit, which in environmentalism is when humans started manipulating nature for their own benefit and developing technology, and of course there is
the coming "judgement day," in which all humans will die from an ice age, floods, hurricanes, etc...yada yada from our sins against the Earth, akin
to conventional religion's doomsday scenarios, like Christianity's Revelations.
Now note, not all people who care about the environment are hard environmentalists and not all people who believe global warming is a problem hate
industry, but many do, and those that do are in positions of power.
Environmentalism in general abhors industry and technology and civilization. To an environmentalist, industry is the enemy.
Unfortunately, many environmental organizations exist that are essentially useless but are very powerful and they will do anything in their power to
remain in power.
What is the rampant fearmongering from environmentalism nowadays? Global Warming. Now, the problem with global warming is two-fold: for one,
environmental science is not double-blind, meaning the experiments are not conducted in a manner that prevents bias. In double-blind experiments, one
group biased one way conducts an experiment and is supposed to remain unbiased, but then another group, biased the other way, is also given the
experiment to conduct, and try to remain unbiased. Neither group is told of the other one's performing the research. Then the results from both
groups are given to a group of people consisting of experts from both viewpoints who review the data and come to a conclusion.
This is not standard practice in environmental science, thus resulting in heavily biased research from both oil companies and environmental
Thus, one cannot trust the information of global warming proponents and skeptics, especially since there are big groups interested in both ways
(environmental organizations who want to remain in power and oil companies).
The other thing with global warming, which I think is a big one, is that the tactics many are calling for to stop global warming, WILL NOT WORK.
Enter the socialistc connection. To an environmentalist, the only way to stop global warming is to hamstring industry; to introduce government
regulation to reduce carbon emissions.
The thing that is neat is, many socialists and environmentalists are very connected, especially in government. Most Democrats believe global warming
is a big threat, and Democrats tend to be environmentalists and socialists oftentimes. However, as of late, many Republicans believe it is a threat,
The thing is, REGARDLESS of whether global warming is a problem or whether it is bogus, or whther it is happening but will help humanity, ONE CANNOT
SOLVE IT THROUGH GOVERNMENT REGULATION. This was witnessed with the Soviet Union.
No other great industrial nation such as the Soviet Union, so claimed to care about its environment and the care of its people, and to have failed so
miserably at it, then the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was a socilialist nation. All their industry was highly regulated by the government.
Which should mean that all politicians claiming that Washington should introduce government regulation to cap greenhouse gas emissions in industry
are, essentially, dead wrong.
The way to solve this problem would be to free up the energy industry---in other words, to give capitalism and industry the freedom that
environmentalists so hate with a passion.
Thus, this will not happen. The other reason is because many socialists see environmentalism as the way to instill fear into the public to get them to
introduce government regulation to control industry, and in the long run introduce new laws that can create more control in society and give more
power to the government.
We can see this with Al Gore and the rampant fearmongering in the media regarding global warming.
None of these people can acknowledge the fact that if global warming is a problem, the solution is not at all to hamstring industry, that such a thing
will fail. The solution is to benefit the very thing they hate, capitalism and industry, so that it can adapt.
So why, if global warming is real (which I doubt it is, but let's say it is real and is a problem), do they suggest a method that will not work to
Because they want to bring about a socialist government and then lead to the NWO, in their fantasies.