Originally posted by BlackGuardXIII
I have seen new research that contradicts you, Marduk. It is from study into the Clovis people, and found genetic traits in Americans that are not in
Asians, but are in Europeans. Also, the Clovis spearhead style is completely different, even fundamentally so, and is nearly identical to ones from a
culture from Europe.
So, the migratory patterns you say are well known, are not. There would be no need for more research if all the questions were answered, but they are
not.
As you said, DNA doesn't forget, but new findings in that area are changing the theories of migration right now. It is most likely that some of the
migration in ancient times came from the east, according to the new genetic research. Either that or all the Asians who had that trait are gone, and
so far haven't been found. Oh yeah, and the speartip thing too... the Asian migration doesn't explain that either.
are you talking about mtdna x
i posted on this in another thread
that is not new research you are talking about
it is complete garbage made up by the A.R.E. to bolster their claim that Atlantis sank in between America and Europe and survivors went in both
directions
like a previous poster said
its dosnt pan out when you look at the evidence
the examples of X found in Native Americans is not the same X found in Europeans
they are not closely related
there is also an X in siberia which is not related closely to the other two either
the closest link that has been proven so far is around 30,000bce in N africa where parent group X1 originates
the groups are as follows
X1 N Africa E Africa and the Near East
X2a Amerindians
X2b and X2c European
X2e Siberia
these latter three groups are all siblings of group X1
but are not related to each other in any way
by the "speartip thing" I take it you are talking about the Solutrean hypothesis
if this was the case then both Amerindian x and European X would be the same group
they aren't