A boeing 757 did hit the two towers

I would like to second this motion Maverickhunter because, from the beginning, you have been 'out of the loop'. You make posts trying to make it look like you know whats going on but each post digs your hole you deeper and deeper.

Instead of just apologizing you try to turn your innappropriate comments into a joke.

Let me respectfully suggest that your take Cygnifics suggestion (which I agree with) and go back to the beginning. Let me respectfully assure you that at this point you have very little credibility left here. Thanks for your understanding.

I don't really care. I haven't been joking, and in case you noticed being sarcastic isn't joking. You are just someone typing on my computer telling me I am dumb to me. Why are you saying they are innapropriate?

Are you annoyed by the fact that I am right and you contradict yourself and that you are wrong? Or are you trying to force your opinion on me for the fact that you claim outlandish hoaxes to be true?

If you want me to stop joking, then prepare to be offended.

Hmm?

I didn't say it was a 767, I said when I said that it was a typo.

Stop saying things that I did not say.

So and what does a c-163 whatever have to do with the topic? I was only talking about the planes that hit the WTC, not which were present, I was inferring that no other planes hit the WTC. Do some reading.

You are the one mixing up different types of airplanes and quotes. That's where things went complicated for you, if you had just read back as John Lear said earlier you might have seen the point where it went wrong.

Let me past you a reply you made that was not even a reply to you:



So next time, dont blame others for your poor reading skills.

So you're attacking me because things went confusing because someone try to attack me because of some error that I typed? how lame is that?

Didn't know myself or anybody else was attacking you. Anyway, i think you still dont understand, so i just give up and move on..

I wasn't talking about YOU, but a bunch of people were ganging up on me on John Lear's side specifically because of his specific speech about how I need to "think about my thinking skills" when I made a typo, which I corrected, as I forgot about the circumstances.

I am certain that what I said was understandable to most people and that they know that I was talking about that 757's did crash into the twin towers and that the wreckage was cleared later on, and those people that don't know what happened most likely have seen edited versions of it live, but I was just saying that and Anok assumed that I meant that I thought that he said no planes were present at the time that they hit the twin towers, but I meant that no other planes hit the twin towers, and that wasn't what I was discussing. I wasn't discussing a conspiracy I was just stating how planes did crash into the twin towers.

Of course a plane could crash into the twin towers, it's called skillfully designed psy-ops to send our nation in a panick. If the government did it they trained hijackers themselves. If they used remote controlled planes too many people in the airport would notice a plane without people so and therefore, the people working there would have to be oblivious to the fact that no one entered the came, in order for there to be no one on it.

Alright Johnlear... I am willing to have an honest discussion with you about whether explosives... holograms... or planes were used to hit the twin towers. I was kind of near sighted before and my vision was really blurry when I wore soft contacts so I would like to be given another chance with this discussion... and that you'd listen to me and not "put me on your ignore list"... you can put me on your ignore list but saying that is against the T&C because it violates the rule of where you cannot bash other members.

So Johnlear. Do not tell me that you have ever thought of one thing before that you were so sure of that it was correct... that you thought it was correct... that it ended up turning out to be incorrect. I am just telling you that it all boils down to how fast the building falls down. 9-11 conspiracy theorists say that it fell down because it was in free fall... and that it was building up potential energy for its collapse... we all know it was going a certain speed for it to collapse so that all of the building could collapse.

Plus, do you have links to describe this hologram technology that you claim the military or the CIA has? I know that 9-11 was obviously planned but that do you feel as though the military really planned for it? Or did they prepare for it and they let out their plans and someone else carried out their method of operation?

Anything is possible... I am not faulting you for that Johnlear.

I am near sighted and with or without contacts, I can easily see the computer moniter right if front me me. I also too wear soft contacts, and they don't blur as easily as hard ones.

MH, you just ruined your credibility with that statement you just made. I am now going to inform you that I will not fight back with whatever negative response you qoute back to me.

Also John has been from the very start trying end fights with you.


[edit on 24-6-2007 by wildcat]

Uh? What? I am near sighted and I have 2-20 vision. Don't judge other people for who they are based off a post from a long time ago. The argument was a "people that supported Johnlear" against "people that respected maverickhunter" from what I see.

reply to post by Maverickhunter

---

Two conspiracys? its all one organized event so if one is a part of a conspiracy it all is!!

reply to post by Maverickhunter

---

Grow up and wake up, your numb nut goverment would do anything to protect there wealth. Not your people the largest terror oganise gang on the planet is the US goverment, most so called terroise are still just freedom fighters.

Let me geusss , the CF 100 , alien planes that look like boeings , my missel boats I used to rent for training of canadian and Amerikans , they did it not lesbian Al Qaeda .

NO mandy did it with cocaine monies .