It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by Maverickhunter
Maybe they made a slow approach and hit the juice in the final few moments....
Originally posted by st111
That was a typo. That was an honeset mistake.
I clicked one button to the right of the five when typing that.
Huh? What was a typo? You didn't even write that, you're not 'st111', or am I missing something here?
Are you posting under two names
[edit on 19/4/2007 by ANOK]
Originally posted by Maverickhunter
...Whaaa? No I am not, I tried to quote some user that said a 767 is a fighter jet and say that I didn't say that, but that a 757 did hit the pentagon...
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by Maverickhunter
...Whaaa? No I am not, I tried to quote some user that said a 767 is a fighter jet and say that I didn't say that, but that a 757 did hit the pentagon...
What are you talking about? I think you are doing more than confusing two conspiracies. You're also confused about what I believe, so do us both a favour, don't try to put words in my mouth OK.
Maybe you should spend some time going over 9-11 threads and learn something, before coming hear making confused conclusions about what other people think about what happened.
I have no idea what caused the pentacon damage, a holographicly cloaked missile, a small military plane, a UFO from the planet zod, or Alah himself.
All I know for sure is there was no 757 at the pentagoon, the rest is just guessing.
So quit quoting me as saying things I haven't said, thanx.
Originally posted by ANOK
^Bud you need to learn to read. I have never said there was no planes at the WTC towers. We were discussing the pentagoon.
As for families, most of them don't believe the official story either. So how is questioning the government disrespectful to anybody?
Your attempt at emotional intimidation is not going to work here btw.
Victims' Families Outraged, Want New 9/11 Panel
[edit on 30/4/2007 by ANOK]
What? You did say that there were no planes at the WTC towers.
Planes were hijacked by Islamic fundimentalists that have hated Eurpoe and the west since midevil times, and most recently starting from around 1776 on. They flew them into buildings, just like they had planned to do for year and we under-estmated their ability to do. Done and done.
Originally posted by johnlear
Originally posted by Maverickhunter
What? You did say that there were no planes at the WTC towers.
I am trying to follow what you are posting MH but it is a little tough when you don't use the proper quotes or who posted it.
Now. Who said that there were no planes at the WTC towers? Please use their name and exact quote. I think we will be able to get this sorted out. Thanks.
Originally posted by fuzzkill
Was there any Plane Wreckage in any of the rubble after the towers collapsed? because if there was that would kinda debunk the whole hologram thoery. Im not going to argue with john lear but because i know nothing about flying but i think the WTC would be a pretty big target to hit and one of the easiest targets to aquire because of their height. if there was any conspiracy in the whole thing, i dont think its wether or not a plane actually hit the wtc but how did the steel melt for it to collapse? explosives would do it but i think you would have seen an explosion at the beams. if the explosion could rip through steel beams it would have easily riped its way through some concrete and be visible from the outside in some way. the only thing that could have done it in my opinion is thermite.
reguarding to what john lear said about the WTC being hard to hit, it would have been even harder for each plane to hit a specific floor. the only way it could have been done then is if there were explosives/thermite placed on dozens of floors at each of the beams on both towers. where would they be able to hide all of that from the people who worked at the WTC?
Originally posted by Maverickhunter
What? You did say that there were no planes at the WTC towers.
I think you are spreading disinfo johnlear, obviously planes hit the twin towers and my quote function is messed up.
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by Maverickhunter
What? You did say that there were no planes at the WTC towers.
Pls quote me where I said that, thanx.
If your quote function is messed up, not sure how it could be, why don't you just look at what you've wrote and fix it before you hit post? Cause at the moment you are miss-quoting, and then claiming people have said what they haven't said. Using something you can fix as an excuse for not making sense doesn't... well, make sense.
Nowhere on ATS have I EVER said there were no planes at the towers, let alone in this thread.
This thread is stupid and getting stupider...
Hmm? You said that no boeing 757 hit the WTC, so and no other planes were present, so therefore no planes hit the pentagon, as no planes were present.
Oh and Johnlear I joke about people spreading disinfo.
it's just my thing to joke about it and I know you're not a disinfo agent.
Everyone has the right to their own opinion.
and I am questioning the 9-11 truth movement because they make contradictions with themselves.
Originally posted by Maverickhunter
Hmm? You said that no Boeing 757 hit the WTC, so and no other planes were present, so therefore no planes hit the pentagon, as no planes were present.
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by Maverickhunter
Hmm? You said that no Boeing 757 hit the WTC, so and no other planes were present, so therefore no planes hit the pentagon, as no planes were present.
I asked you to quote where I said 'no plane hit the WTC'. Until you can pls quit saying I said that, I didn't, never have, ever...
My mind is not made up enough to make that claim.
Yes I believe no 'Boeing 757' hit the pentagoon, but I didn't say 'no plane' hit the pentagoon. Not enough wreckage to convince me a Boeing 757 hit the pentagoon, let alone the crazy flight path that an experienced 757 pilot would have trouble with.
I also didn't say no other planes were present. In fact there were 'other' planes present, like a C-130 for example.
Quit making assumptions about what people think.
[edit on 2/5/2007 by ANOK]
Hmm? You said that no boeing 757 hit the WTC, so and no other planes were present, so therefore no planes hit the pentagon, as no planes were present.
MH, let me respectfully suggest that you need to improve your thinking skills.
First of all it was me that said no 757's hit the WTC because none did. 767's were the type of airplane that allegedly hit the WTC.
I said that hoping you would see your error and start thinking about it. But no. You decide that if no 757's were there then no other planes were present and therefore no planes hit the Pentagon as no planes were present.
Thats probably the most illogical thinking I have ever seen displayed on ATS.
Let me respectfully suggest that you carefully read the posts and then think about it for a little while before shooting from the hip.
Oh and Johnlear I joke about people spreading disinfo.
Everyone has the right to their own opinion.
Opinons yes. Calling someone a disinformation agent is not an opinion unless so stated.
and I am questioning the 9-11 truth movement because they make contradictions with themselves.
This is your privilege but you did not make that clear in any way.
Originally posted by Maverickhunter
Well where was this C-130? Is this another conspiracy that hasn't been proven true? Well the only plane that was present that seemed to hit the twin towers was a 757, and I was asking if there were any other planes that hit it, if you say that no 757 hit the twin towers.