It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Global warming conspiracy?

page: 5
2
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 11 2011 @ 10:09 PM
link   
All climate change science today has based its assumptions made from data provided by the IPCC reports. Here are some interesting facts about them.

4,000 scientists did not claim human production of CO2 caused global warming. Only 5 IPCC reviewers endorsed its core claim - and there's doubt they were even scientists;

For its 1995 report, UN IPCC scientists advised five times there was no evidence of humans causing warming. Yet IPCC politicians' reported to national governments and media: "The balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate";

UN IPCC data on the air's carbon dioxide (CO2) levels show carbon dioxide is a consequence of temperature, not a cause. This is true for every period in Earth's history and over every duration;

The 2007 report's sole chapter claiming warming and attributing it to humans contains no specific scientifically measured real-world evidence (AR4, chapter 9) for its claim. It relies on computer models programmed to predict warming. Yet cooling has occurred;

The UN IPCC chairman repeatedly publicly claims the IPCC uses 100% scientifically peer-reviewed literature. Yet its 2007 report cites and relies on 5,587 references not peer-reviewed - including hikers' stories, newspaper articles and political activists' campaign material;

UN IPCC figures reveal scientific peer-review is corrupted, often bypassed and even prevented. In the real world these reports would be rejected. In business, the writers would be prosecuted;

UN IPCC guidelines force scientists to change their report to be consistent with the political Summary for Policy Makers released months earlier;

The UN IPCC does no scientific research and is not accountable to any national governments.

The UN IPCC has spend in excess of $2 million dollars in legal battles refusing to release their original raw data;

In Australia where I live, the government announced details of their carbon tax on Sunday. It is essentially a redistrubution of wealth and a percentage of this goes to the UN. This is the model that all countrys pay tax to the UN which in essence will become a 'governance authority with teeth'



 
2
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join