Originally posted by semperfortis
The old card has been played so many times and strangely enough, NEVER come to the ultimate destructive conclusion all of you doomsday placard wearers have been heralding...

Come on.. At least scare us with something new...

The Republican party and their faith based minions are the only ones marketing an apocalyptic vision of doom. Fear is in fact considered the Republican core belief stretching from their religion of preferences to their foreign policy. We are suppose to be afraid of Osama, Saddam, Ahmadinejad, Kim or the latest devil the Republicans conjure up.

But do you feel any better about voting for Hillary?

Actually I would never and will never vote for anyone that threatens to steal someone else's property...

Nor will I wilt under scare tactics of the lies about the Loss of Social Security, the impending doom of the National Debt, Increased taxation and the increase of Government....

But that is all for another thread and not for here....

It is difficult at times for me to get my mind around the way she waffles all over the spectrum. Even allowing for the inevitable lack of morals inherent in any politician, she amazed me with her total disregard for another persons personal property; all the while she is worth arguably millions....

But in the long run, they are all alike in so many ways this time around, will it really matter who we vote for??

The Republican list is sure not confidence inspiring..

Semper

In concept:

Democrats: Want to have the government give everything to you. They want bigger government.

Republican: Want less government, but the government that is should have absolute control, and think militarily

This is why the last couple of years were so bad. To much of an extreme. If you give in to one side too much you get the extreme.

The only thing that works is if you "Bring balance to the force"

Originally posted by Royal76
In concept:

Democrats: Want to have the government give everything to you. They want bigger government.

Republican: Want less government, but the government that is should have absolute control, and think militarily

This is why the last couple of years were so bad. To much of an extreme. If you give in to one side too much you get the extreme.

The only thing that works is if you "Bring balance to the force"

And that's why you vote Ron Paul! A libertarian! (well, he's noted as republican, only so people take him seriously though)...seriously though, How come America is stuck in this whole Two Party Schtick? It's retarded. If neither Republican, nor Democrat fit your needs, there's MANY more parties waiting to fit you! And most of them have candidates with better credentials.

Originally posted by Roper
The other one will be based on Race.

The dems say they are for the little guy, but how can that be when they are for big government And of course, the dems play the race card fabulously. The thing ppl dont know is that it is the dems who want the black guy to stay poor. The poorer they are the more power the dems have over these ppl. It helps them with their slogan of "standing up for the little guy", which in turns, gets them their votes.

I was listening to mancows morning madhouse on the radio to work one morning and they were discussing the very thing. And before ppl start lableing me as a conservative, Ill tell you right now, im not. Im neither a dem or a rep. If I had to choose I would say I LEAN more towards the conservative side manly because I dont believe that the dems want whats best for our countyr. The Dems are all for bigger government, which like I said, takes more and more power away from the ppl of this country.

The Democratic party as it has been run over the past several decades believes in the "divide and Conquer" strategy of winning elections. It works! There are a lot of sheep ready to be fleeced.
Roper

Couldnt agree more.

Originally posted by semperfoo

The Dems are all for bigger government, which like I said, takes more and more power away from the ppl of this country.

Unfortunately, so are the Republicans. The Republicans are not Conservative anymore, and the Democrats are not Liberal anymore. They're working hand in hand to accomplish their elitist domination.

I would consider myself a Conservative (Well, Conservative Libertarian). But no where in the last few administrations have I seen anything 'Conservative'.

To Conserve, you must Preserve. And the two big parties do not. I've had it w/ them.

Oh, I get why you guys try so hard.

From: www.socialistparty.org.uk

"Socialism has to be international.

It's impossible to create socialism in one country, surrounded by a world capitalist market.

Nonetheless there is an enormous amount that could be achieved by a socialist government after it came to power as part of a transition from capitalism to socialism."

(Hannah Sell, Socialism in the Twenty-First Century - the Way Forward for Anti-Capitalism)

So for it to work it has to be world domination. I get it now.
Even if it doesnt work itll be too late because the whole world is under a

......lets say it all together now....

New World Order!



Is world domination necessary to keep people from fleeing out of socialist countries? Solve the "freedom" problem by not allowing an alternative?

I wonder how Barishnakov wouldve felt about that.
Or all those Cubans who drowned trying to get away.
Or the guy from Belarusse who put up some of those ATHF adds in Boston.

Kill the choice and theres no uproar. Dont give them a fence to look over and it wont matter what color the grass is.

[edit on 8-2-2007 by thisguyrighthere]

She has a debt of 10 million. I saw it on the news which i flip on to see whose lying through there teeth every once in a while.

She owes alot of money and the only thing hilary would do is ruin our contry some more, just like every candidate running for president would.

Democracy was never democracy, democracy is communism. The people whom think voting makes a difference can keep on thinking that, but to tell you the truth I think it does not. Bush had a 2nd term, thats plenty of proof for me.

Socialism can be in one country it does not have to be spread world wide.

Rethink what social security is and when you use your social security number.

I can tell you for sure someones personal ssn is used in every bank account opened. Now why is it that you have to tell them your ssn# to open an account? Why is it that you are asked if you are a U.S. citizen and not American?

Ssn's can lead to identity theft and much worse if not taken care of properly, so why is it that its such a common thing to ask for?

A strange world we live in today, likely a communist, socialist, and facist country of the good ol U.S. corporation set up by the Rockefellers.


[edit on 6-8-2008 by Quickfix]