It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why Anunnaki? Why now?

page: 2
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 6 2007 @ 12:04 AM
link   
King OG recorded in the bible had a bed 13feet long.
The giants are real,
also heard stories of giant bodies found in caves of the grand canyon, and somebody dynamiting them in the thirties...??
It seems that archaeology is fraught with fraud and with hidden info.
There also was aparantly a race of elfen size beings too.Skeletons fron asia or thereabouts found llately.
Why wouldnt the nephelim, and the annunaki be the same?
There is no reason that extra terrestrials wouldnt want to spread their genes to other parts of the world.
what about the south american gods which showed up, taught a bunch of stuff to the people, and mysteriously left one day...
The austrailian aborigines have extra terrestrial beginnings as do many plains indian tribes ledgebnds tell.
There are tales of space ships in ancient indian liturature,as well as tales of the gods that owned them....
wake up and smell the coffee, where thertes smoke theres maybe fire?




posted on Feb, 6 2007 @ 12:58 AM
link   
These guys are assuming that every single writing/inscription that they are talking about was intended to be non-fiction. I think that the Sumerians just had myths similar to those of ancient Greece and Rome... with different gods floating around on clouds and all that crap. There is no real evidence of this planet-x alien race, especially not in primitive cave-painting folk tales. Guys like Sitchen are just looking way too hard for something that isn't really there...



posted on Feb, 6 2007 @ 01:31 AM
link   
How do you know those Myths aren't real?

We may look at ancient stories as myths - - because they seem to fantastic to be real. It is very possible they are more real then myth.

Yes - there has been evidence of "giants" - - but the argument is in the translation of Nephilim.

Apparently the correct translation is still being debated and there is no clear answer.

The Hebrew word Nephilim means “the fallen ones,” and it comes from a verb, “to fall away,” “to cast down,” or “desert.” And finally, there is the Hebrew term “HaGibborim,” translated “mighty men” (in some versions, “giants”). In the Septuagint the Greek word gigantes is used for these, which does not mean “giant” but “earth-born,” from the Greek gigas.

These “earth-bound fallen ones” were the hybrids that resulted from the sexual activity between fallen angels and human women.



posted on Feb, 6 2007 @ 01:39 AM
link   
I confused the word with Seraphim.

But, wouldn't a nephalim, which translates to a fallen one, be sort of related to a seraphim?



[edit on 6-2-2007 by necroflesh]



posted on Jul, 24 2008 @ 02:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by necroflesh
I confused the word with Seraphim.

But, wouldn't a nephalim, which translates to a fallen one, be sort of related to a seraphim?



[edit on 6-2-2007 by necroflesh]


A seraphim represent the highest known rank of angels.
If we are to believe this that they were the higher ranking beings to come to earth at that time and histories perception of them.
One day we might be privileged to see the true history of earth, until then, beliefs will vary, religions will confuse the masses, and the modern day may destroy itself until then.




[edit on 24-7-2008 by MREALE]



posted on Jul, 24 2008 @ 02:36 PM
link   
reply to post by DocGonzo
 


The theories were started by Zecharia Sitchin. He has written many books in the Von Daniken mold and claims to be the only one who can properly translate Sumerian tablets. All other matters on Anunnaki and Nibiru were taken from Sitchin. He doesn't care as he sells more books that way.



posted on Jul, 24 2008 @ 02:48 PM
link   
True about what Sitchins has researched over the years.
Until more proof can come forward to back his theories it’s easy for him to sale more and more books.
But let’s not forget more ancient texts from Enoch that may collaborate on those theories.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join