THAT needs to be clarified.

I'd like to see some statements by other senators before I pay too much attention to it.

I think it is quite possible that weapons couldve hit the US if delivered to terrorists. The questions till remains, where are these weapons? Who knows maybe over time they will find them, maybe not. Either way this doesnt sound like that big of a deal to myself. It couldve been the director of the CIA who gave this briefing, they dont say who it was. I would also think the Intelligence Committee wouldve had knowledge on all of these issues, so that doesnt directly relate to the President.

This needs to be corroborated, because I'd imagine, or even hope, that this is an impeachable offense.

Now that the weapons have been moved to Syria, I wonder if they can hit Moscow and Helsinki?

Originally posted by THENEO
Now that the weapons have been moved to Syria, I wonder if they can hit Moscow and Helsinki?

Saddam was captured in Iraq.

Uday and Qusay were supposedly at least killed in Iraq.

Top men of Iraq were in Iraq.

If there would have been weapons that would have actually moved to Syria..

So would have been these persons in Syria.

Use your brain please, that is if you got one?

I'm getting very tired of your insults Fulcrum.

I will NOT allow one more of them.

Now regarding my comments,

if WMD as in mobile launchers with various heads were in fact moved out of Iraq to the North to Syria via open borders due to lack of US forces during war then they could conceivably strike into europe.

dont fight guys, iam not really afraid of any weapons striking on europe, plz leave us out haha..

THENEO,

If they would have had those weapons,

And managed to smuggle them out of Iraq,

So would have Saddam, Qusay and Uday 'smuggled' their asses out.



Your 'day dreams' are quite funny, but im tired of you, and your stories that have no realitty base.

Bush loving Canadian..

What a joke..



[Edited on 17-12-2003 by FULCRUM]

jozuph,

People do not strike you because they hate you or know you or need to,

they can strike you because they want to and it benefits them.

consider the theif or the purse snatcher or the mugger.

they attack who they believe they can attack successfully.

there is a lesson in that for all nations, states, regions, cities and communities.

not everyone in the world sees things the same and not everyone envisions the same future.

For example if Russia turns hard core socialist again will it not look hungrily upon first its lost east block states and then Western Europe?

Luckily most of your leaders see this as a possibility.

is life fair, NO, should there be wars and violence, NO. but there are so we should deal with it.

Originally posted by THENEO
jozuph,

People do not strike you because they hate you or know you or need to,

-It looks like thats theyre only reason to strike the usa.

they can strike you because they want to and it benefits them.

-so, thats why they probably wont strike europe..

consider the theif or the purse snatcher or the mugger.

-I think these people are no thiefs or purse snatchers or the mugger

they attack who they believe they can attack successfully.

-then they would be mad busy..

there is a lesson in that for all nations, states, regions, cities and communities.

-word !!

not everyone in the world sees things the same and not everyone envisions the same future.

-More then true !!

All of the Bush administrations lies will come out soon enough. They fooled the senate into war just they fooled the American public. (well a part of the America public obviously not everyone is that stupid!) It's just lies lies lies ..