Substitute for Oil, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 28-2-2007 @ 11:11 AM by pai mei
news.bbc.co.uk...

Hugo Chavez talks to Fidel Castro in the tv show "Hello Presidente"

Castro: [Interrupting] Yes. You have been reading for a long while. You have great talent to keep it all in, to remember everything. The only thing you sometimes forget is figures.

Chavez: I forget numbers but not that much.

Castro: However, you have them all bookmarked and never miss one. It is not easy to keep up with you.

Chavez: Do you know how many hectares of corn are needed to produce one million barrels of ethanol?

Castro: To do what?

Chavez: To produce one million barrels of ethanol?

Castro: Ethanol. I believe you told me about that the other day. Somewhere around 20 million hectares.




[edit on 28-2-2007 by pai mei]


reply posted on 28-3-2007 @ 12:55 PM by Long Lance
let me suggest taking into account two aspects, namely


soil depletion:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

and

synthetic fertilizer: www.fromthewilderness.com...



burning by- and waste products is a good idea and it should be done, as long as its energy balance is actually positive (therefore cost efficient) and is environmentally friendly (no cutting down forsts, in the amazon or elsewhere).

turns out most variants propagated today are falling short, especially biofuels from crops. these are failed technologies and (imho) our best bet for now is to reduce usage of oil products for stationary use, such as heating, then switch over to natural gas and derivatives while exploring ways to safely harvest methane hydrate fields.

the stored methane is released soner or later anyway, f we burn it to water and CO2, the effect is actually less than that of methane, in terms of GHG emissions by a factor of ~20. not that i believe in the global warming scare, but i have a weak spot for win-win situations.

yay or nay?


PS:

Originally posted by etotheitheta
Fuel is easy, so consider the substitute for chemical feedstocks. There's a tough a one.


looks like we'll have to do without plastic then. who's going to miss it? /jk

i'm inclined to say that tons of (badly sorted) resources are potentially available in landfills, albeit at significant cost.

[edit on 28.3.2007 by Long Lance]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^