It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Iran strike rejected by ex-generals

page: 1
7

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 4 2007 @ 05:05 AM
link   
There will be "disastrous consequences" for security in the Middle East and also for coalition forces in Iraq, if any action is taken on Tehran's nuclear crisis. The three former military officers are urging Washington to resolve this in a diplomatic fashion, by starting direct talks.
 



news.bbc.co.uk
They said the crisis over Tehran's nuclear programme must be resolved through diplomacy, urging Washington to start direct talks with Iran.

The letter was published in Britain's Sunday Times newspaper.

It was signed by:

* Lt Gen Robert Gard, a former military assistant to the US defence secretary

* Gen Joseph Hoar, a former commander-in-chief, US Central Command

* Vice Adm Jack Shanahan, a former director of the Center for Defense Information

They said such action would further exacerbate regional and global tensions.


Please visit the link provided for the complete story.


I couldn't agree more with these officers.

There is no evidence, that Iran is producing nuclear weapons. Washington must really engage Iran in serious talks, with no threats of war or sabre-rattling. And let them produce the required uranium they need. If it goes into nuclear arms instead of power...

Then start a war, by all means. But all we've got is threats of war, with no evidence of, "why?".

Any thoughts?

mod edit: removed pending from title

[edit on 4-2-2007 by UK Wizard]




posted on Feb, 4 2007 @ 05:30 AM
link   
probably just propaganda, to put the opposition of. they always need some element of surprise, and do not want to be seen as starting the war.



new topics
 
7

log in

join