Texas Requires Anti-Cancer Vaccine for Girls/Conflict of Interests?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 4-2-2007 @ 04:36 PM by Mystery_Lady
Originally posted by Royal76
Forget about the money. If it works it will keep women from having cervical cancer, and certain STV's, this far outways any money these company's make. If it works, who freaken cares, they will deserve it. As a son, a brother, and future husband, i love this drug, IF IT WORKS.


That is the problem. It is not a cure for cervical cancer. The girls who take this vaccine can still get cervical cancer. The only thing it does is supposedly prevent 2 different types of HPV. The problem is that there are more than just 2 different types of HPV virus.

The other problem is they know it works for the short term, but have no idea about the long term. From the research I did on Google they still don't know if it will be effective for the long term.

They subject the girls now to this new vaccine, then 10 or 20 years later they are wondering why the vaccine didn't work? More than likely will say that person never got the vaccine, or come up with some bogus information to protect the vaccine.

The only response I was able to see as far as long term effects was that the Sweeds were doing long term tests on this drug. Basically keep an eye on what the Sweeds are doing. In other words it is still in the testing phase in Sweedan.

Not to mention there is a three shot regimine, and each shot by itself costs well over $300. Big money for the pharma companies. You would be paying well over $900 more closely to $1000 for a vaccine that really hasen't been tested as thoroughly as it should have been.

The FDA also recently passed it. I'm thinking of all the other drugs the FDA recently passed, and then had to retract such as Vioxx. Do we really want to risk our daughters lives with this?


reply posted on 7-2-2007 @ 02:46 AM by Sauron
No one has to take this crap, there is no law, it's all about money and the hell with your children.
Perry is doing what he is told to do, and it's not by you, the public.

No Law To Mandate Dangerous, Untested HPV Vaccine
Media hoax fools parents into thinking Merck shots are mandatory, big pharma laughs as obscene profits roll in.

[~]
A media hoax has fooled parents in Texas and other areas of the country that the HPV vaccine, which experts have slammed as untested and has already been linked to dangerous side-effects, is now the law and young girls must take it. Merck Pharmaceuticals are set to capitalize on this fraud by making obscene profits from a crony deal with Governor Rick Perry, while children are put at risk.
[~~]
According to the
Associated Press Perry has close ties to Merck, having received money from them for his re-election campaign .
[~~~]
Perry's former chief of staff Mike Toomey is on the Merck payroll as a lobbyist.
[~~~]
There is no law in America, aside from those applying to medical workers, that says you or your child has to take any vaccine whatsoever, no matter what any executive order, requirement, mandate or policy dictates, there is no situation where you can go to prison for refusing a government vaccine under the U.S. constitution and the law of the land.

As in the case of all other vaccines, Perry's executive order merely states that the vaccine is "recommended," yet the mass media drumbeat constantly conditions people to believe that if they don't take their shots they will be kicked out of school, arrested and thrown in jail. This trick will continue to hoodwink Americans into taking all manner of dangerous and untested vaccines, the number of which rises every year, until they realize that there is no law that forces them to take any vaccine.

www.prisonplanet.com...


[edit on 7/2/2007 by Sauron]


reply posted on 7-2-2007 @ 11:10 AM by missed_gear
Originally posted by Sauron
No one has to take this crap, there is no law, it's all about money and the hell with your children.


There has been a fairly large amount of recent debate on this issue here in Texas.

Indeed, there is no blanket law making such a requirement of the parent for a child....

However, as in the case of all state ‘recommended’ immunizations in the State of Texas, in order for a child to attend a public school, charter school, or private school which receives funds from the state (such as G&T programs) and private schools that adhere to state guidelines to keep their insurance etc.…the child must be vaccinated according to a required immunization chart to attend the afore mentioned schools; but there are some exclusions available. These same exclusions are mentioned in the Governor’s recent order.

The obvious exceptions/exclusions are medical which must be documented and presented by a licensed medical doctor to the Department of Health and causes the parent to inherit a ridiculous amount of paperwork each and every year (this one I know personally and it was for only one semester).

The other pertains to those of conscience, including religious beliefs; which is somewhat difficult to obtain. A written request must be made by the parent to the TDH to obtain a ‘request form’ and the parent will/may receive this after TDH review. Furthermore, once/if the exemption form is received these exemptions (if granted) are only good for two years and will be in need of renewal. The process from beginning to end may take months and if not begun early enough, the child will not (in almost all cases) be able to attend school while pending.

All of this places the burden directly upon the parents to prevent, thus in a majority of cases it is a de facto state law. Albeit, there are certain ‘outs’ a determined parent may pursue.

Full text example of immunization exemption procedure and state law.
TDH faq. page on these procedural issues.
Example (pdf.) of a large Texas school district immunization schedule.
Texas Govenor's Executive Order



mg


reply posted on 12-2-2007 @ 07:04 AM by dbates

Mike Toomey, the Merck lobbyist who is Perry's former chief of staff, is not without influence.

Some suspect Perry may have a lot of Merck stock. But the public can't know for sure — and Perry isn't supposed to know because the governor's holdings are in a blind trust.
source

The small detail that Mike Toomey is in Merck's pocket shouldn't be overlooked. This drug goes for $360 a pop. If you multiplied that times the number of 6th grade girls you just hit the Vegas jackpot. Once this flies in Texas and the door is open other states will soon follow.

Here's another interesting tie-in to this whole deal.

At least two legislators have asked Attorney General Abbott to rule on the legality of the vaccine order. They contend Perry lacks the power to order the inoculations without legislative approval.

...one would think that Abbott would welcome the opportunity to weigh in on the controversy. ...Such a ruling, however, could open the door to an attack on Perry's coal regulation order, and Abbott may prefer to avoid setting a precedent.
Why?
TXU executives gave the attorney general's campaign about $12,000 during the last election cycle.


You can read more about Perry's executive order on new coal plants here. I'm not sold one way or the other on the vaccine but the silence from other political opposition is deafening. You see, all the pigs have their snouts in the trough and are afraid to squeal about others eating for fear of their own food being taken away. It looks as if those with deep pockets are pulling strings in Texas to get their way.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Church of HIV: Inventing the AIDS Virus
  Posted 5 days ago with 64 member flags
5 Mainstream Diseases Respond to this drug ! - Breakthrough!
  Posted 17 days ago with 14 member flags
Why are dead people waking up around the world?
  Posted 4 days ago with 12 member flags
Dying For A Smile
  Posted 12 days ago with 11 member flags
Harvard To Be Tried for Alzheimer\'s Research Fraud
  Posted 4 days ago with 10 member flags
Man loses penis to flesh eating bacteria
  Posted 3 days ago with 9 member flags