It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dreamstone
So much anger...but some valid points as well. The points about his speech are not valid points, he freezes in front of the camera. He has neither the tongue of Clinton, or the looks of JFK, and yet he is still president. How can that be if he supposedly had no brains? Perhaps bush isn't so stupid after all...
So much anger...but some valid points as well. The points about his speech are not valid points, he freezes in front of the camera. He has neither the tongue of Clinton, or the looks of JFK, and yet he is still president. How can that be if he supposedly had no brains? Perhaps bush isn't so stupid after all...
Originally posted by JeanLucPicard
I like Bush and I support him in any direction he goes. He said that he would find Saddam and he did. He is going to come through for us and get himself re-elected.
Originally posted by RANT
I don't 'hate Bush' either. But I am upset with his Dad over two things...
Pulling out of Iraq early, and not pulling out of Babs soon enough.
Originally posted by REASON
Whats the point of having an intelegent bull#ter like clinton.
Bush is too religous but clinton was better for disgracing his office by getting b-jobs there? yea right.
Bush relates to the common man and his greatest advantage as president is being underestimated.
Originally posted by Dreamstone
A peanut farmer democrat was the most down to earth man we had? I don't think so. JC was good(he did appear in a King of the Hill episode) but teddy roosevelt and andrew jackson were far more of the "action" president we have in Bush. Like it or not, Bush acts, which is something that cannot be said of many politicians. Calling him stupid just seems like a way to justify a democrat's lack of action.
Originally posted by Dreamstone
.....andrew jackson were far more of the "action" president we have in Bush.
Originally posted by Bangin
Originally posted by Dreamstone
.....andrew jackson were far more of the "action" president we have in Bush.
Ah, Andrew Jackson and his Indian Removal policy. You know, I think you may be on to something.