Originally posted by kenochi
Some facts...
no original Nazi gas chambers were ever found. The gas chambers shown to tourists at Auschwitz and other camps are reconstructions built after the war
by the Russians and Poles.
You do realize that this has already come up in this thread, right?
The use of homocidal gas chambers at nazi death camps has been
confirmed. There were nazis who admited to it after capture. There were nazis
who wrote about it in their diaries prior to capture. THere were prisoners who witnessed it (but I guess they don't count because they're 'eviiil
jooos' ), there is also documentary and
forensic evidence that the chambers were used to
kill people.
So please don't come here with that worn out nazi-trump of 'there were no gas chambers'.
Unfortunately they are of crematoria, not gas chambers. Simply taking a blueprint of a different kind of room and labelling it with the words
'gas chamber' doesn't mean that it was one
So even though the nazis had blueprints of chambers that were for the holding of human beings and the venting of toxic gas, AND they were directly
connected to the camp morques and associated with mass cremation ovens, thats not a 'blueprint'.
kenochi
They weren't 'death camps' - that's a silly, melodramatic name for them
They were specifically set up to exterminate
human beings, they most certainly were death camps. There were some concentration camps that
weren't necessarily death camps, rather they had death camps associated with them. Not all concentration camps are death camps. The British put the
Boers into Concentration Camps during the Boer war, 6 million Boers didn't die because of it.
The Nazis created those camps to put
jews and other undesirables into them in the first place. Not criminals, not POWs, not resistors, but
jews and 'sub-humans'. Then they started the attempt to
exterminate them. The destruction of the semitic people and culture from
germany to make it more Aryan and less restricted and more powerful was the core of Nazi ideology and the ariosophy on which it was based.
tom goose
was it really because Hitler was a madman?
A person who systematically tried to exterminate another race is by definition a madman. Hitler wasn't a raving lunatic, clearly. He was rather
brilliant. He went from a lowly common man to become the leader of all of germany. Germany went from a defeated and humiliated and disarmed and ruined
country in the midst of perhaps its greatest economic catastrophe, and become one of the supreme powers of europe and the world under him.
He also hated jews and non-germans to the point that he tried to exterminate them as a people.
So he wasn't a jibbering lunatic, but he was definitely a madman
the holocaust did happen, but like 9-11, was it an inside job?
Its utterly preposterous to suggest that the jews carried out the holocaust under the noses of the nazis. Its absurd to even suggest that the jews
went along with it, to 'get israel'. If the germans hadn't been defeated, and they were barely defeated, then the jews in germany would be
extinct.
Yes, I'd have to agree. They're the kind of people who leap on tiny apparent inconsistencies in the historical record, who assume that their
(rather dubious) experts on the Holocaust are telling the truth, but that the rest of the world is somehow blinkered and who will not believe you when
you lay out all the mountains of evidence that it happened. 
if you said "our site", i would probably have listened, this place is starting
to seem like the mob. 
