posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 07:04 PM
After wading through most of this garbage, I can only be dismayed at how some people's brains work, if that term can be applied to this.
I've noticed that virtually every obsfuscatory technique available to debating has been used. Everyone here on ATS, or should be, familiar enough
with them that I don't have to, and won't, enumerate them individually.
I personally know several survivors, their testimony is rock solid as far as I am concerned, because in the course of my reading (I read lots of
books, on many subjects; WWII is an era I've mined deeply and broadly), virtually every detail they've told me I've been able to corraborate
through official reports, photos, eyewitness testimony, etc, in such overwhelming amounts and details from widely diverse sources as to preclude any
notion whatsoever that the Holocaust didn't occur.
It occurred horrendously: any quibbles over whether it was this number or that number are morbidly idiotic. Millions were murdered: they didn't
And all those horribly different ways to kill people, while they may not have been official SOP, occurred individually here and there, accepted as
sort of a "boys willl be boys" mentality.
Truth4hire, kenochi, what's your point, really?
Statements like the Holocaust was insufficient reason for the Jews to be given Israel leads me to believe that you are both basically anti-semitic,
grasping at whatever straws you can to justify your racism which leaks through your writings no matter how hard to try to be "scientific".
Let's look at your premise:
The Nazis didn't gas Jews.
Ok, let's say for the sake of argument I agreed with you. Where does that leave us? They still murdered millions of people.
So what's your point?
That the Nazis were better than we give them credit for? Hardly, even if the premise were true.
If there were only three million Jews killed by the Nazis, would that make you feel better? How would that change the fact that the Nazis
deliberately, with conscious thought and very considerable effort, murdered millions of other people based on their racist idealogy. What difference
does how they went about it make?
What exactly is the point you're trying to make?
Sometimes I get the feeling through your writings that you're actually disappointed that they didn't complete the job.
So again, what's your point?