Sleeper is definitely genuine. A genuine opportunist. A genuine story-spinner. A genuine so-so writer. It is remotely possible that he may even be a genuine contactee (though, IMHO, he probably is not). The fact that he claims to be one and has a compelling tale to relate is enough to gain him entry – even if some details are sketchy and he has both detractors and devotees aplenty – perhaps especially so.
Nevertheless I do have one trouble spot to share – and it was just brought up again – so here goes: I respect Hal completely - his posts have been lucid and usually right-on-the-money. But I am compelled to slightly differ Hal, where you state:
I think there is some entertainment value for some members (not for me) and he is not making money off of it and no one is getting hurt. If the Admins want to let him keep posting that is there business and you should just ignore the threads.
The fact that the story is indeed "entertainment value" (i.e., has a potential and declared profit motive in the form of manuscripts/screenplays etc) and that he is indeed making money (or at least trying to), in my opinion crosses a line. My understanding was that the admins were not to condone or support the self-promotion of for-profit works.
I was under the impression that there is no ambiguity and is to be no 'exclusions' to this policy. Elsewhere it has been claimed by some posters that certain members are given, in rough summary, 'preferential treatment'. You may disagree, and some might chide such an observation, but hints of nepotism are unavoidable to the discerning eye (and sleeper is not unique in this regard).
With great admiration and reverence I commend you, and especially all of the admins and their moderator assistants for maintaining what is arguably the finest forum on the 'net that deals with these important issues. It's a tough job, time consuming and I certainly don't envy all of the petty mud-slinging and babysitting they need to do all day, every day, just to maintain decorum.
Yet, since the OP asked about a member as being genuine – the correlation of authenticity and member value motives is inescapable. Clearly, since the admins felt it was necessary to expose the member’s identity along with pen names and book titles, an operational fallacy is manifested and, somewhere along the line, probably in the ATS Board Room, will have to be dealt with. I hope it did not open a can of worms for these good folks…
Meanwhile, it will only be a matter of time before the next budding sci-fi author starts a fascinating thread, playing to the curiosity and emotions of devoted ATS members, and then perhaps finds a way to weave into the discussion (or debate) his for-sale works.
Maybe the admins would consider a separate for-profit area that authors/playwrights/artists could promote their works. I for one would visit such an area frequently and probably buy or at least peruse the offerings of our many talented members. It may even be an ultimate source of residual revenue for ATS…
In any case – thanks to all for contributing their thoughts and opinions – they ALL have immense value…





