Originally posted by Annee
OK - let's try this again.
Ball of Pop - - if you were Sleeper how would you provide proof for your experience?
And it is Not so much that I believe Sleeper - - I believe Me.
Other people have had experiences - - and they usually can tell what is and isn't.
The problem is that there are several pardoxes and conundrums within the story, part of which is that it is "proved" to be true by its inability to
be proven true.
For example, "Sleeper" says that "ET" will not allow actual proof, and that "ET" is in complete control of everything. If "Sleeper" were to
now produce some sort of actual "proof" that "ET" didn't want to come to light, it might "prove" a part of his story; however, it would
disprove that "ET" is in complete control. In essence, it would prove and disprove his story at the same time.
How many people have claimed to have a close encounter of the 4th kind? Many. How many have produced actual proof? Is hypnotic progression actual
proof? I wouldn't say so, but perhaps it shows that "something" is happening. Are strange markings on the body proof? Are unknown biological
"chips" removed from "abductees" actual proof? These things may lend some credibility to an "experiencer" but is not definitive proof.
What further clouds "Sleeper's" story is his admission that "ET" can implant false memories that are as real as actual ones. False memories are
just that - FALSE. LIES. DECEPTION. In other words, his "source" is an admitted pathological liar, yet, "Sleeper" would have you believe that
"ET" hasn't lied to him. To those that believe that, I would simply ask them to explain why "ET" is lying to their other "abductees" and what
makes their stories any less credible than the one in question here.
Again, many have claimed continued abductions with "aliens", yet the more in-depth information an "experiencer" has, the less it seems to match up
with other "abductees" in-depth stories. By that, I mean those that simply a basic abduction usually have very similar stores - detestable creatures
doing detestable things to them; however, those that have extended contact with "ET" and delve into motives and agenda rarely agree. One person
might say "ET"'s message to humanity is "X", another will say "Y", and yet another "Z".
Sleeper's "ET" "revelations" are a bit unusual due to the lack of any "imending doom" about to overtake humankind if we don't "change our
ways" (whatever that means).
The point is, the messages are rarely the same and often contradictory. "Sleeper's" tale is also fairly unique. Assuming that "Sleeper" and the
others are truthfully relating their experience to the best of their ability, I think there's one logical conclusion to drawn - NONE of them can be
trusted. Not because they are liars, but because their "source" is.
If the police were looking for witnesses to come forward to report what they saw at the scene of a crime, they initially would take their statements
and see what the balance of the evidence points to. If the witnesses independently agree with each other, the police likely have reliable witnesses
and a good case. Now, what happens if all the witnesses contradict each other on various important points? It won't make much of a case and the
police will have little idea of what actually happened.
If that weren't bad enough, what if all the witnesses said "we were on drugs that makes it impossible for us to tell the difference between reality
and fantasy?"
There will be no "proof" forthcoming from "Sleeper". He would be the first one to say it and probably already has.