The Coming Demise of American Militias, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 13 times


reply posted on 21-4-2007 @ 07:20 PM by Melbourne_Militia
G'day Justin,

Good Post.....Im glad to have come across and you have hit the nail on the head.

Here in Australia, we have never had a "militia" culture or need in our past, thou we have had the opportunity to legally own firearms and there is a large (in relation to our populace) number of hunters/shooters who do follow what the governments are doing and who are getting pee'd off about how things are starting to turn.

Even thou we do not have any organised militia's I am pretty sure that if the fecal substances hit the fan, they could and would be organised pretty quickly through like minded individuals via clubs and the like.

I agree that militia's have to raise their "public" profile within their communities, like a previous poster mentioned how Hezbollah, even thou labelled a terrorist organisation, has raised money and funded schools, hospitals and the like. American Militia's have to do the same thing. Raise their reputation, organise community events/shows/ have free charity activities like helping the elderly in their local communities, mow their lawns, help with disaster rebuilding programs after a tornado, the more public good they do the better the profile they will get, and the more members they will recruit/attract. Im sure there's a role for everybody within the militia's and it doesn't have to mean that because you are a member that you will be doing paramilitary training.....you might get women joining who might help organised and stockpile supplies and rations, clothing, etc.

BUT.....they must not forget their purpose whilst all the goods deeds in the community are being done. They must continue their training, both military aswell as concealment, how to fight and blend into the public almost instantaneously. How to fight and hide your weapons, then when the time is opportune return to the fight and disappear again. You cannot fight an enemy who constantly disappears and reappears.....as mentioned earlier like the IRA and some others.

Im sure the militias will see within their own ranks who they can trust more than others to undertake certain training, but then there is always the fear of being labelled a terrorist......and this is a problem the militias must overcome and educate the public that they are Patriots not terrorists, and they must adhere to the law at all times, even when at home, for anything that you do will be tied back to the militia and tarnish their reputation.

It takes a long time to be recognised for the good that you do, but only a moment of weakness to undo it all again.

Surveillance is a problem for the future.......so is technology.......the government can listen and watch what the militias are doing which is why they need to come up with electronics experts within their ranks, to jam government surveillance systems, what are those electro-magnetic pulse bombs called that fries the electronics within an area?

bring the fighting, if needed back to a basic level.....the feds have satellites, how are you going to evade being seen by that?

Justin you are absolutely correct that militia's need to adapt and modernise but this is only possible to a certain level, for if you get "TOO GOOD" you become a threat, and we know how governments dislike threats.

The other option is like Justin mentioned is to go underground and become a secret society within a community, that is willing and prepared to fight a corrupted government attack.

Then again as good a discussion this is we are in the end speculating. for unless we take part and contribute to a militia organisation we aint really doing too much for them talking here.

They have always had a "redneck" and reckless reputation and they clearly need to smarten up their profile for they look like they will be needed in the near future and they must be prepared.

Gun Law changes will put the heat on them and will be interesting to watch how they react.....wether in a professional manner and one enabling discussion and negotiation over the issue with authorities or wether they start ranting "we aint givin up our guns for nobody....."

Thanks for the post, sorry for my long response


reply posted on 26-4-2007 @ 08:53 PM by Justin Oldham
There is a militia-related discussion going on in another forum that you should be aware of. Please click the link to see it for yourself.



reply posted on 26-4-2007 @ 09:04 PM by Justin Oldham
Some of my predictions have been very quick to come true. Federal law enforcement has recently raided an Alabama militia, and they've uncovered some very unsavory things. The media will be very quick to use this "incident" to villify the honest militias.


reply posted on 27-4-2007 @ 05:26 AM by Ghost01
Here's another example of how Militias are Villified by the American Media:

The Militia Movement- Extreemists

This Entire article is nothing short of a Rant about extreemist. It does Nothing to acknowledge the fact that some groups are Very Patriotic Americans, who would defend our country in a heart beat. If someone who is uninformed reads this, they might think militia are demestic terrorist. Many people forget the American Militias played a Key role in the Revolutionary War.

Now you see what we're up against!

Tim


reply posted on 27-4-2007 @ 04:13 PM by Justin Oldham
Okay, I got a stack of u2's on this, so I thought it might be worth your time to read about it here. It's very important for you to do your own homework. You've got to know that you arrived at your opinion on your own. There are a lot of civic groups that you can strike up a conversation with. I'm only going to provide one example here, to get some of you started. Sending e-mail with links to this thread is fine and well, but you've got to form your own opinions. Kowing what you think is just as important as why you feel that way.


reply posted on 28-4-2007 @ 11:31 PM by NGC2736
In comment on an earlier thread, if you chose to look for it, I spoke for caution where someone else seemed more rash, IMO. I too take these portents seriously, and think our liberties are under attack as never in the history of this nation. and yet, as all patriots, I will stay my hand till there is no other recourse. I am gladdened to hear another voice of reason.

Even so, we must be prepared, and to this end I feel you have made a significant contribution Sir. For image alone cannot withstand the onslaught of war, and make no mistake, it is war of which we speak. A war that we hope to avoid, but prepare for nonetheless. Backbone is required in such matters. Let no one deceive themselves, if it comes, Heaven forbid, to such straights, then men will perish once more for the sake of freedom.

Therefore it is on the shoulders of each who would feel such a call to be worthy of the challenge. This means more than the ability to fight, it also means the purity of motive and the willingness to place those you fight for above your own needs.

In the past men even of low character have had great following by the use of largess, both monetary and otherwise. As a case in point, look at the lengths to which the outlawed James brothers were aided, despite their obvious ways. A recent example is the way 'biker' clubs have improved their image, including the notorious Hell's Angels. These are examples of two sides of the same coin. Namely ingratiating your organization to the community as a whole.

No organization exists in a vacuum. To be a viable force you must have the support of at least a good portion of the population in the area where you expect to operate. This is best done through charity and a strong moral image. And that image cannot be false, as such will be soon be noticed. Strong ties to the community at the lowest levels is the only way to obtain the support that in a crisis would sustain a militia in confrontation with a federal force.

A firm and long standing relationship of community involvement to the point of some forms of social benefits to the needy, especially when those same benefits are denied or curtailed by the federal organizations, will build a bond between the militia and the community to such a point that the militia will become accepted above the 'far away' state.

This requires that those involved in militias be truthfully openhearted and giving people, caring for the welfare of those around them. While there need not be an open book policy as to membership, this would require an office corresponding to a PR branch.

I will in the future follow your thread with interest, and offer my opinions as seldom as possible. I am sorry for the long post, but this is an issue for which I have much feeling.

I feel another flag is due.


reply posted on 17-5-2007 @ 06:29 PM by SpeakerofTruth
Justin, per usual you have brought some insight into a subject that I hold dear. There is not much doubt in my mind that there is an effort by the "powers that be" to disarm the citizenry and especially these group we call militias.

It seems to me that this effort intensified with the botched raid on Mt. Carmel and the Branch Davidians. From that point to the present, there has been an ever increasing move towards the disarmament of the American public.

Here is a typical purpose for a militia

Earlier this month a plainspoken gentleman of Arizona named Chris Simcox announced that a citizens' group he founded—the Tombstone Militia—was about to undertake the function of protecting his state's and the country's borders from invasion.
Militia's purpose

Now, without getting off topic, it's obvious that the federal government has/is and most likely will continue to fail at securing the nation's borders. This is not even an issue of illegal immigration. This is an issue of our nation fighting against terror organizations and continuing to allow its borders to remain open.

Militias, some at least, want to fill the gaps that the federal government has so miserably failed to fill.

Another aspect to this whole issue is this one, which could very well happen within our lifetime and some would argue is already in the beginning stages of occurring. There are an increasing number of people who believe that the U.N is going to wind up being given an overseer position in national affairs. In the mind of many of these individuals, what better way to do such a thing than to first disarm the resistance. I couldn't agree more.

While others would argue that such an event is not likely to occur, I am awfully suspicious of any government, particularly my own, that would disarm or attempt to disarm its populace.

[edit on 17-5-2007 by SpeakerofTruth]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 16 days ago with 122 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 18 days ago with 86 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 18 days ago with 83 member flags
10 People Whose Warnings Went Unheeded
  Posted 4 days ago with 77 member flags
Superbowl Halftime Conspiracy!
  Posted 8 days ago with 75 member flags