SCANDAL: BKK's New Airport Loses Safety Certificate and Diverts Traffic back to Old One, page 1

Build on reclaimed land on what is known as Nong Ngu Hao, "The Swamp of Cobras", Suvarnabhumi, the controversial new airport of Bangkok, can now ad to its trackrecord "least functioning" if not "most dangerous". Previous on its record list is "longest delayed", "largest free-standing structure" (the terminal) and "tallest control tower". With a budget estimate of 20 billion baht and finished last September at a pricetag of 150 billion baht it is probably among the gravest exceeds in construction budgets at all. To that they now have to ad another estimated 50 billion baht to repair runways. In use for only four months they are seriously cracking, thereby becoming a safety risc, so serious that last week the Department of Civil Aviation denied to renew its Safety Certificate. The final blow to a project designed to become the aerodrome-hub of SE Asia, came yesterday. Please note, it's not only the runways that have problems, they are the top of the iceberg, but sluggish constructions and inconvenient layouts pester the structure. A nightmare for the users, but no doubts an extremely good deal for the constructors, as it was lucrative for three generations of politicians.

---

First error was the particular site. The choice was done almost 50 years ago and must have involved heavy interests in the Swamps of Cobras. The next was to rely on building non-piled runways on reclaimed land. Some tech experts really must have done some convincing talk on construction to sell non-piled runways (probably at a slightly higher price). The following errors can be called customary to the culture, taking bribes to get people in position for land deals, contracts etc. The most profitable among those would have been taking bribes for doing nothing. China, Malaysia and Singapore will have transfered considerable amounts to the the private accounts of politicians to delay the project. All three countries have opened their own new airports in the region.

Expert warned 15 years ago building on a swamp was trouble, but already the landowners then was politicians and their strawmen. You think they would listen?

Even before the airport was operational, reporters pointed out that cracks were forming in the unused runways. They were met with lawsuits of defamation and fired from their jobs. Now they're proven right and thePress Council of Thailand are seeking justice on behalf of sacked reporters.

But justice will never befall the millions of travellers who are forced to use the facillity - unless they choose to go somewhere else of course. I bet quite a few will do so rating the safety risc using Suvarnabhumi. Measures are taken to correct things, someone has to pay, to be held responsible. But the real perpetrators are to be found among the decision makers decades ago. They're long gone with their bribes safe.

So they hold these two men responsible. Nice characters, eh!?

Top airport managers face the chop

. . . . . . . . .
Chotisak Asapaviriya, president . .Somchai Sawasdeepol, director
of Airports of Thailand . . . . . . . . . .of Suvarnabhumi airport

The last year's events in Thailand is an object lesson in how not to do things. All they seem to do is shot themselves in the foot. Some say they are like children without responsibility acting spontaneous, thinking about making money NOW. Yes they are and if needed, others can pay later.

Hopefully not by disaster.

Here's some further reading on Suvarnabhumi, the Swamp of Cobras.

Airport has safety pass held back
Some airlines afraid to use new airport
Airport debacle 'caused by graft'
New Airport cursed by corruption scandals


Related News Links:
www.nationmultimedia.com
news.bbc.co.uk


[edit on 30-1-2007 by khunmoon]

[edit on 30-1-2007 by UM_Gazz]

[edit on 30-1-2007 by DontTreadOnMe]

Savarnabhumi, the mother of all sloppy and corrupt projects

I included a link to a thread about the new airport, but somehow it didn't make it in the OP. Here it is.

Suvarnabhumi, Bangkoks Corruption Ridden New State-of-Art Airport

An exelent OP from today's The Nation must be included as well.

Old Thai proverbs shed light on airport fiasco



An independent investigation is underway, but as the one they had on the scanner hoax, they usually don't find out anything. Really, nothing truely independent exists, least of all in Thailand.

Besides from being a money machine, and just as important for their national vanity, it was a prestige project.

Which makes it kinda sad for the Thai people - but it was a all too predictable outcome for any skeptic on the project.

That it was pushed harder than the swamp could stand by the now ousted meglomanic is evident.



I know valid comments on this case might be sparse. My own involvement in the country makes it a pretty a hot topic for me, being dependent on the BKK airport. I haven't yet had the delight to experience the new one live and I'm inclined to expect the worst the day I have to.

But what do you think about corruption, when it is so far that it is open and obvious, an integrated part in the life of a society, the carrot that makes an administration turn and the only mean by which things can be done.

What do you think about this "the mother of all sloppy and corrupt projects"?

The National Legislative Assembly (NLA) has set up a committee to look into the corruption allegations of Suvarnabhumi. An admiral, Bannawit Kengrien is its chairman.

Corruption 'could stem back to Thaksin', he says.


No matter the approach, of course it must stem back to Thaksin. He was the only PM who could get things done, the only one this country ever had with an ability like that. Most politicians just take what's on the shelf, but he actually put up new shelves. More to pick from.

And Suvarnabhumi is probably the largest shelf the kingdom has ever had.

Seventeen administrations has handled it before it actually was fastned to the wall. But the quality and the means by which it is plugged, leaves a lot behind it now shows.

The actual construction has only been undertaken by the last three administration. And the last one, the only one ever, not only to stay a full term, but reelected for a second term, had time enough to fulfil the job. That it wasn't time enough to fulfil it properly shows.

Errors and faults now show up, and hadn't it been for the vital part, the runway, we might never had heard about them.

The rain through the roof, the missing or non-functioning toilet facillities, the grave misuse of commuter space for commercial purposes, the bad lightning or the firesprinklers not connected and the misfunctioning emergency exits would hardly had been mentioned by the press if it wasn't for the runways.

The accessibility issue would have been brought up now and then, most likely without changing anything. That's how things often are in Thailand, they don't work the way supposed to, but can somehow be used anyway, because you learn to live with it. That's what they do in Thailand.


Now you have an issue a part of the world has to live with, the part of it going to Thailand, and it becomes an issue of national prestige. Therefor someone has to at least give a mock to clean up. If there's no prospect of not just holding someone responsible, but actually to pay, it ain't worth the hassle. They might have a good suspect of shady ways in the ousted PM, but I doubt they ever get him to pay.


It's not just the airport issue -being partly an international one- it's all the domestic issues, the constitutional drafting, the corruption and graft issues, the urgent need for reforms in society and a poor legislation on enviromental issues threatning the health of people, that all comes together and creates major crises. It's a moral crise, caused by a desecration and decline of traditional values, giving way for corruption. It's about unadressed social issues.

The old king is about the only person to have a sound moral habitus left in the country. He's highly revered and looked up to as an example. But next time he turns eighty, and local etiquette and taboo prevents me from discussing the family as such and his son in particular.

Today's tidbit from The Nation.

IATA WARNING:
Using 2 airports 'a huge hassle'

The International Air Transport Association says using two airports in Bangkok will hit Thailand's potential to be an aviation hub, and flight connections between the two airports will be a major inconvenience for travellers.

"To grow Bangkok as an aviation hub, the long-term vision should be to have all commercial flights operating out of one airport. A two-airport operation will dampen Bangkok's potential for becoming an aviation hub. Making flight connections between the two airports will be a huge inconvenience for passengers," said Albert Tjoeng, Asia-Pacific manager for corporate communications.

In addition to fixing the problems at Suvarnabhumi, Airports of Thailand should also quickly start work on building the much-needed additional capacity at the new airport, he said.

Next week leading architects of Thailand will meet with Savarnabhumi authorities to urge them to take an overall concept in the action that has to be taken on the disaster.

"Treat the disease, not the symptoms", Sinn Phonghanyudh, president of the Association of Siamese Architects says.


Don't say they didn't say.

In the ongoing saga of greed and curruption and its pawn, the $50 billion airport Savarnabhumi, a preliminary commission into the calamity hos spoken.

SUVARNABHUMI CRISIS -- problems clearer, but no answers
'No need to close airport'; firms blamed but not named; 'foreign experts needed'

Water seepage into layers of sand beneath Suvarnabhumi Airport is partly responsible for cracks and ruts in areas where heavily-laden planes manoeuvre, according to an investigation.

The Tortrakul Yomnak fact-finding committee said yesterday seepage was responsible for at least 80 per cent of taxiway damage.

Oh my gewd... 80% and sooner or later I have to go in and out of there.

Committee soil expert Prof Dr Surachat Samphantarak said airfield settlement will not cease after draining because it is built on a layer of soft clay. He said although clay immediately below the airport structure had been strengthened a decade ago by prefabricated vertical drainage (PVD) - draining water from the layer - untreated, deeper clay would continue to settle.

Sure ain't good, when you build on a swamp ...remember the name, Nong Ngu Hao, "The Swamp of Cobras", as the locals called the place before it became Suvarnabhumi. Something ghastly can easily follow over to any structure build on a location with sucha whitchy name of origine.

But don't worry folks experts are here to calm us.

"Slowly but surely the clay is settling," Surachat said. "If the pavement is not strong enough we may have differential settlement in different areas. Swampy soil subsides at different rates," he said. That can result in more ruts and cracks.

"I also doubt if the PVD technique was done right. How do we know the contractors completed the drainage process. There is no data supporting the [contractors'] claim settlement in the treated soil layer was stopped [before paving commenced].

How very, very convinient.

Hrmm.. :? maybe they should get more traffic so it can settle quicker? :sacsm:

The affected taxi areas appear to share a common trait, Suebsak said. Water from heavy rain during construction and additional flooding after completion entered the drainage system and seeped into the 1.5-metre-deep sand layer below the pavement. Trapped water mixed with sand destabilises the sand layer, causing cracks on the surface.

While it appears ruts and cracks are confined to about 80,000 square metres of airfield now, experts said it was likely damage could spread to most of its two million square metres. That is owing to increasing traffic and because the layer is already saturated.

Whau, 2 million square metres... that's a square about a mile on each side. Just crumbling as traffic increases.

A drainage solution is needed before the next wet season. "I say most of the taxi lanes and taxiways have been trashed," Suebsak said.

Experts said the key issue was that water should never have seeped into the sand layer and suggested drainage systems were "clearly not designed properly".

Only goes to show, that's how it goes, when it's about money and not security .. ...but one should have thought it was about national pride, leavig at least some cautiousness to the quality issue not having it all on the profit alone.

But no! ...you seldom can say so. That's about a norm in this country, but you would had thought security overrides profit.

Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 4 days ago with 83 member flags

Google announces privacy settings change across products; users can\'t opt out
  Posted 17 days ago with 78 member flags

Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 6 days ago with 72 member flags

BREAKING: Israel teams with terror group to kill Iran\'s nuclear scientists, U.S. officials tell NBC
  Posted 2 days ago with 72 member flags

Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 17 days ago with 67 member flags

FDA\'s New Claim: "Your Body Is a Drug—and We Have the Authority to Regulate It"
  Posted 9 days ago with 53 member flags

Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags

Bill Gates Backs Climate Scientists Lobbying For Large-Scale Geoengineering
  Posted 4 days ago with 41 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: