It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If 9/11 is a conspired misdirection to unite the US for a war effort against Iraq, why?
Is it oil?
Is history connected in some master plan for US complete control?
Is Bush secretly insane, like adolf hitler?
Is it the Military industrial complex, creating a market for death?
And most of all, who is good and who is evil?
Media: "Bush good, *terrorists* bad"
Conpirators: "Bush evil, *terrorists* innocent"
Reality: "Good and evil are subjective, and as long as the end justifies the means, perhaps it is no ones place to put either of these labels on anyone until everything is said and done."
They want to call Bush an idiot in one breath, yet credit him with planning and carrying out the attacks of 9/11 with the next breath
They want to claim that he manipulated WMD intelligence, yet didn't have the foresight, or "intelligence", to realize that the crap would hit the fan when these weapons that he knew weren't there weren't found.
Bush IS an idiot. And I DO NOT credit him with anything other than being just that, an idiot. He is a puppet and is being used as such.
I believe Bush was told to occupy Iraq by the Puppetmasters in an effort to secure artifacts from ancient Babylon. I also believe the same tactic was used in Afganistan. What better way to keep other governments prying eyes away then to limit their access to the entire country.
But if you want to argue that it wasn't about money at all, then why are American companies being hired to make huge pipelines through Afganistan? And why are American companies being given complete control over the Iraqi oil fields? Either way I believe that both these situations are being used to distract the publics attention from what is really taking place. What better way to do that then to have everybody arguing about money and oil profits that are being gained in plain sight. Everything important can then be done in secret.
Everyone who knows Bush on a personal level knows that he's not an idiot. Regardless of your beliefs, an idiot could not become president of the United States. No matter how much pull you think his father has, an idiot could not graduate with degrees from Harvard and Yale.
You're kidding, right? Our government spent hundreds of billions of dollars, damaged their international credibility, and gave the lives of thousands of soldiers and even more civilians, just so they could get their hands onARTIFACTS??? I'm guessing they were really after that stargate in Babylon, right??
To the victor go the spoils!
The fact is, any business which we do in Iraq and Afghanistan also benefits its citizens through added jobs, tax revenue, better infrastructure, etc. Plus, its not like we invaded these countries so that we could take over all their business contracts.
I can't tell you how many days in a row we packed my Hulk Hogan bong,
But now I have since matured and am seeing things more clearly.
Originally posted by Rasputin13
But I'm sure someone will respond with a post about the military industrial complex and how we're losing the war in Iraq on purpose and promoting a civil war on purpose so that we can make more money off of it!
Originally posted by Inannamute
I'm sorry, if it wasn't clear I was asking for NON-US humanitarian invasions..
Originally posted by Inannamute
I'm sorry, yes, I said that one of the three could be any US invasion, (with humanitarian reasoning behind it), but my phrasing didn't make it clear enough.
I'm just curious as to history.. Any example where the invading force stated that they did so for the good of the people they were invading..