It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Crakeur
speaker, the NY Times Book Review wrote about this book in yesterday's paper. It might be of interest to you.
Originally posted by super70
32,000- to 80,000-year-old bones
Originally posted by 11Bravo
Number one-we really dont know how old these bones are at all. They could be 500 or 5,000,000 and any number given by anybody is little more than a guess.
Number two-we really dont know if these bones had any offspring.
To assume that they were an evolutionary link we would have to assume that they had offspring, and further more we would have to ASSUME that the offspring they had were a different species, which has never happened in the history of recorded science.
One species giving birth to another entirely different species is impossible.
Originally posted by 11Bravo
even though there is a 50,000 year window for their 'fact'.
Where are you getting that from? There is not even a mention of an error bar in that FOX article. What other article are you citing?
Number one-we really dont know how old these bones are at all. They could be 500 or 5,000,000 and any number given by anybody is little more than a guess.
Thats false. Scientific dating techniques are not 'mere' guesses, anymore than the calculations used to send rockets to the moon are 'mere guesses'.
To assume that they were an evolutionary link we would have to assume that they had offspring/quote]
No one is claiming that they are a species that lead to man.
One species giving birth to another entirely different species is impossible.
Since no one is claming this, its irrelevant.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Where are you getting that from? There is not even a mention of an error bar in that FOX article. What other article are you citing?
Monday, 29 January 2007, 22:30 GMT
'Hobbit' human 'is a new species'
The tiny skeletal remains of human "Hobbits" found on an Indonesian island belong to a completely new branch of our family tree, a study has found. The finds caused a sensation when they were announced to the world in 2004.
But some researchers argued the bones belonged to a modern human with a combination of small stature and a brain disorder called microcephaly.
That claim is rejected by the latest study, which compares the tiny people with modern microcephalics.
Microcephaly is a rare pathological condition in humans characterised by a small brain and cognitive impairment.
In the new study, Dean Falk, of Florida State University, and her colleagues say the remains are those of a completely separate human species: Homo floresiensis.
They have published their findings in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
...
"LB1 has a highly evolved brain," Said professor Falk. "It didn't get bigger, it got rewired and reorganised, and that's very interesting"