It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by groingrinder
Originally posted by spacedoubt
Terrorists and Islamofacists love pacifism.
Makes things easier for them.
My best to the families of those who were shot in the back of the head, instead of being taken prisoner, like Americans would do a captured insurgent, under similar circumstances.
Not unexpected though, when fighting a culture of death.
They risked their lives, and they knew the consquences. There will be more to fill their shoes.
Is it only me? Can I possibly be the only one who believes that you should not under any circumstances take prisoners? It makes more sense to leave your enemies dead on the battlefield. Close down Gitmo and just kill em all where they stand on the field of battle.
Originally posted by brill
That's the spirit, eye for an eye who cares if they're innocent. Its comments like yours that give birth control merit.
brill
Originally posted by whaaa
Originally posted by pugachev
Originally posted by whaaa
Originally posted by VoXiSo
More barbaric acts, when will it stop..
So if a foreign force invaded your country to steal your oil; how barbaric would you be?
Prove that someone is stealing the oil...
Here ya go pugachev.......
I don't expect you to believe it though....
I don't even think you will read it.
news.independent.co.uk...
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
Originally posted by brill
That's the spirit, eye for an eye who cares if they're innocent. Its comments like yours that give birth control merit.
brill
Oh please, dont try to come off with some sort of arrogant superior morality. If these Iraqi civilians who had been shot in this matter than their would be calls for crucifixion.
there will just be several Iraqi civilians that turn up shot. You dont think these types of things go on without retailiation do you? several Iraqis will die for this and hopefully the ones that did this.
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
Originally posted by brill
That's the spirit, eye for an eye who cares if they're innocent. Its comments like yours that give birth control merit.
brill
Oh please, dont try to come off with some sort of arrogant superior morality. If these Iraqi civilians who had been shot in this matter than their would be calls for crucifixion.
Originally posted by VoXiSo
BAGHDAD — Four of the five Americans killed when a U.S. security company's helicopter crashed in a dangerous Sunni neighborhood in central Baghdad were shot execution-style in the back the head, Iraqi and U.S. officials said Wednesday. Read More
More barbaric acts, when will it stop..
Originally posted by Vekar
Dying from one shot to the back of the head is in no way barbaric, why? Just look at what bushes army is doing to the people of Iraq, they aer dying slowly, painfully, and indiscriminately. These people WERE (now because they are dead, thank goodness) mecenaries, as someone said: hired guns. After what they have done, I have no quams about the Iraqis shooting them on sight, they have every right to do so.
I will say it again: one bullet to the back of the head is not barbaric, it is a QUICK, and PAINLESS death vs. the USAF bombing civilians and tearing off their limbs and letting them live. I say the USAF and Marines, as well as their mercenary army is beyond barbaric in how they act and fight. The Iraqis are not, they shot them once in the head, they did NOT torture them, they just shot them. Besides, why would any sane fighter allow the enemy to get their people back when they are fighters as well? Just add to enemy numbers, when you could just shoot the four and know that is four less to deal with on a later date.
The Iraqis did the LOGICAL thing, because the USAF is going to bomb that area to the ground ANYWAY now, that or the Marines are going to go in and shoot civilians for the next two weeks, which is extreme barbarism.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
Originally posted by marcopolo
First off I want to say the posts at the beginning by Dock6 and Johnlear are bang on.
The Iraqi people suffer this kind of treatment everyday, fact is the media aint gonna educate you on it because that wouldnt be "Patriotic".
Anyone seen Fahrenheit 9/11? remember the part where they film in Iraq, interviewing some marines and Iraqi civilians, do you remember the dead child being put in the back of a truck, remember the anger and sadness in the mans eyes as he shouted, the marines talked about how they "napalmed" a suburban area (I was genuinely surprised as I didnt know weapons like this were still being used). The injuries that napalm causes is without a doubt one of the most inhumane weapons you could possibly use in a war, the storm kicked up about how Saddam used chemicals against his victims was as I remember one which caused universal disgust, so what exempts the US military forces from this, in certain cases you could say it was necessary force...but the fact that this was targeted at a suburban area, an area which is likely to be containing the homes of many innocents families, would it be unreasonable to suggest that the Generals in charge might have thought,
"hmm? wait wont napalming that are that do alot more harm than good", would it be unreasonable to suggest that he might have said, "Men tell you what, due to the fact that this area is densely populated with civilians a sheet of napalm approach wont be a good idea so we'll go in on the ground instead."
heres a link to the full fahrenheit 9/11 video if anyones interested,
Fahrenheit 9/11
Have you ever seen Fahrenhype 9/11? have you ever seen the interviews with folks who Michael Moore mischaracterized/misquoted, or used things out of context and are pissed off at him? Fahrenheit 9/11 is nothing but BS.
Have you ever seen Fahrenhype 9/11?
have you ever seen the interviews with folks who Michael Moore mischaracterized/misquoted, or used things out of context and are pissed off at him
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
Mercineries are not protected under the geneva conventions.
The resistance showed the documents they took from their bodies. They where mercs pure and simple, unlike enemy soldiers they deserved not one ounce of sympathy.
How come they execute Iraqi and US soldiers?
Now you say US soldiers deserve sympathy, little contradictory to some of your past statements, don't ya think?
Also, since we're talking about the "Geneva conventions", according to your logic, we can execute "resistance fighters" freely since they are not covered under the Geneva accords.
As to Iraq, the U.S. government has recognized from the outset that the Geneva Conventions apply by law and all Iraqi detainees are covered by them. All Iraqi military detainees have had POW status
usinfo.state.gov...
The provision regarding lack of uniforms is one of the more important exceptions. The basic idea of requiring formal insignia for combatants is to make it so that the soldiers of each side can differentiate enemy combatants from enemy non-combatants. If the soldiers of one side cannot easily determine whether someone on the other side is soldier or civilian, then there's a much greater likelihood that civilians will be killed. One of the things that those who composed the treaty wanted to try to do was to reduce the slaughter of civilians in war.
Therefore, if an enemy combatant is captured and is not wearing any recognizable insignia or uniform, he is not entitled to any protection at all under the Geneva Convention. He can be executed on the spot without trial, for instance. He is considered to be committing a war crime by fighting without any such insignia, but if he's executed then those who order the execution and those who carry it out are not committing a war crime.
That provision regarding combatants without insignia applies to three major cases: to insurgents (such as to guerrilla action in occupied areas), to soldiers trying to hide among civilians during formal combat, and to spies. The argument for not rewarding each of these cases is the same and is valid; if you grant them protection anyway, you will encourage more of all three with tragic consequences.