It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Spawwwn
Yeah but you know what the problem is, this video plainly shows how these people producing these 9-11 denying videos are proven liars.
examples shown in the film such as the careful editing of one of the basement eye witnesses reports. The edit out any information that they think might not fit their agenda, and butcher his words and make it appear like he said he heard bombs going off in the building.
I honestly don't know how anyone with a truley objective and openminded opinion can watch screw 911 mysteries and screw loose change and STILL think these conspirocy theories are true.
i honestly believe that anyone who buys into the 911 conspirocy thing, is either dillusional, gullible, or has a low intelligence level and can't comprehend that a lot of these theories aren't even based on real science.
professional controlled demolition workers don't belive you. people who demolish buildings for a living, don't belive this whacky story?
did you all ever stop to think why the 911 truth movement is DYING? it's not beacuse people are being silence, information is being supressed, or people simply "just won't listen". it's because the people who make these truth tapes and spout this nonsense are PROVEN LIARS. it's been proven time and again that they can't be trusted. it's been proven they will twist and distort others words and actions and second guess everyone in the world, so long as their agenda is met.
remeber...911 conspirists and CTers aren't people who are actually smart, just people who THINK their smart.
Originally posted by Spawwwn
remeber...911 conspirists and CTers aren't people who are actually smart, just people who THINK their smart.
Originally posted by 1150111
I'm supprized this guy is not banned yet. He calls our points of view idiotic, and he calls us stupid. What on earth has ATS turned too.
snip
Sheeple these days...
Originally posted by Skibum
I want to see your mathematical equations proving it
Originally posted by Skibum
I don't mean grainy pictures and videos, I don't want to hear "it defies the laws of physics". I want to see your mathematical equations proving it defies the laws of physics. You say "there wasn't enough energy", show me the proof. You say "it fell too fast", you ought to be able to show that as well. It shouldn't be that difficult, there's a lot of posters here that say physics proves their case. So prove it. Everything in physics can be expressed in numbers, prove your case to me.
Originally posted by Skibum
I see you don't believe in practicing what you preach. "what on earth has ATS turned too"
Originally posted by 1150111
You don't need mathematics to know this, just common sense.
Originally posted by stingray
PROOF IN UNDER 60 SECONDS:
Originally posted by Skibum
Here's the wiki on the Second law of thermodynamics, there are numerous equations there that can be used when dealing with the second law of thermodynamics there. Please show me which ones apply or if the ones that do apply aren't there where might we find them. Also read the description of the SLOT and explain how it even fits in with what you are saying.
Originally posted by Skibum
I don't want to hear "it defies the laws of physics"...
Originally posted by Skibum
I don't mean grainy pictures and videos, I don't want to hear "it defies the laws of physics". I want to see your mathematical equations proving it defies the laws of physics. You say "there wasn't enough energy", show me the proof. You say "it fell too fast", you ought to be able to show that as well. It shouldn't be that difficult, there's a lot of posters here that say physics proves their case. So prove it. Everything in physics can be expressed in numbers, prove your case to me.
I am standing on a ten meter platform; on top of this platform I have two 5 kilogram bowling balls. Now to my left and right there are two separate pools of water. However, on my right side there are 5 plaster boards mounted in a tower one meter apart (vertically) starting from 1 meter above the surface water.
Now if I told you that I dropped the bowling ball in exactly the same manner on both sides (the bowling ball on the right going through the path of the plaster boards mounted in the tower) and that I managed to measure the speed of the bowling ball as it struck the water to be exactly the same on both sides, would you not be able to see the logical impossibilities of this experiment without being presented mathematical equations?